US elections and domestic politics
Claims about American elections, parties and domestic policy.
82 checked claim occurrences · 6 sources · 4 attributed speakers
Every claim on this topic
No claims match the selected filters.
-
Trump said Zelensky started the war and was a dictator
On February 19, 2025, Trump posted on Truth Social falsely accusing Ukraine of starting the war with Russia and calling Zelensky 'a Dictator without Elections.' Multiple major outlets (NBC, CNN, PBS, Al Jazeera) confirmed both claims were made that day.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
Trump's statements about Zelensky happened two weeks before the disastrous Oval Office meeting
Trump's Truth Social posts calling Zelensky a dictator and accusing Ukraine of starting the war were made on February 19, 2025, and the Oval Office meeting occurred on February 28, 2025 — only 9 days later, not two weeks.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
The speaker wrote the New York Post cover the next day after Trump's statements, featuring a big picture of Vladimir Putin with the headline 'this is a dictator'
The New York Post did publish a front-page cover with a large photo of Putin and the headline 'Mr. President: Putin is THE dictator' in response to Trump's posts, but it was published on February 21, 2025 — two days after Trump's February 19 posts, not the next day. The cover was written by columnist Douglas Murray.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
Yanukovych was democratically elected with elections verified by the EU.
The 2010 Ukrainian presidential election that brought Yanukovych to power was assessed as free and fair by international observers including the OSCE, PACE, and a European Parliament delegation, marking a significant improvement over the disputed 2004 election.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
The US poured $100 million into street protests against the democratically elected president of Ukraine over whether he would tilt toward an economic deal with Europe or with Putin
The commonly cited figure for US spending tied to Ukraine's Maidan period is $5 billion spent in Ukraine since 1991 on democracy promotion broadly — not $100 million specifically directed at street protests. That $5 billion figure itself is widely debunked as a misrepresentation of a Victoria Nuland speech. The actual US-funded protest support figure is contested and far less clear-cut. Additionally, while Yanukovych was elected in a 2010 election deemed largely legitimate by OSCE observers, calling the Maidan purely a US-orchestrated protest obscures that it was primarily a spontaneous civic uprising against his suspension of the EU Association Agreement.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
Condoleezza Rice and other American officials insisted that the Palestinians should have elections straight after the Israeli withdrawal
Multiple sources confirm Rice pushed hard for Palestinian elections, confident that the moderate Fatah party would win; she later acknowledged that armed groups like Hamas should have been barred from running.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
Hamas won [the elections]
Hamas won the January 25, 2006 Palestinian Legislative Council elections with 74–76 of 132 seats and approximately 44% of the vote.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
Hamas didn't have another election again and ruled Gaza for 18 years until the 7th of October 2023
Hamas did block free elections in Gaza after taking full control in June 2007, but the duration is overstated: from the January 2006 election to October 2023 is approximately 17.7 years, and from Hamas's actual military takeover of Gaza (June 2007) to October 2023 is only about 16.3 years — not 18 years.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
Sources used for this check
-
The Hamas election was in 2005
The Palestinian legislative elections in which Hamas won took place on January 25, 2006, not 2005. The speaker says '2005' when referring to the election, but all sources confirm the date as 2006.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
Sources used for this check
-
There was an attempted coup after the Hamas election, and that's when Hamas seized complete control
It is disputed who initiated the 2007 conflict. The pro-Hamas view holds that it was Fatah (backed by the US) who planned a coup against Hamas, which Hamas pre-empted. The pro-Fatah view is that Hamas itself staged the coup. Framing it unambiguously as a Fatah coup attempt that Hamas foiled is a one-sided characterization of a genuinely contested historical event.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
Sources used for this check
-
Donald Trump had his envoy Witkoff go over there and work out this ceasefire deal that they had for a few weeks
Steve Witkoff was indeed Trump's envoy involved in the ceasefire deal, and a phase one ceasefire did take effect in January 2025. However, the ceasefire was mediated by the US, Egypt, and Qatar together, and was originally drafted under the Biden administration — Trump's team helped finalize it as president-elect, so attributing it solely to Trump/Witkoff is misleading.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
Sources used for this check
-
Palestinians elected Hamas in their elections
Hamas won the January 2006 Palestinian Legislative Council elections, a fact confirmed by multiple sources including Wikipedia and the European Council on Foreign Relations.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
John Brennan accused Donald Trump of treason
Confirmed by reporting in The Hill, which noted that Brennan, as an MSNBC commentator, accused Trump of 'treason' in relation to the Russia investigation.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
Sources used for this check
-
In 2017, Donald Trump cut off the CIA program to fund the anti-Assad rebels.
Multiple credible sources, including The Washington Post and Al Jazeera, confirm that in July 2017 President Trump ended the covert CIA program to arm and train moderate Syrian rebels fighting Assad's government.
Video Joe Rogan Experience #2303 - Dave Smith & Douglas Murray
-
China's reserve drawdown saved the global economy, the United States, and Donald Trump from the largest oil shock in history.
China's inventory position may have reduced its immediate demand for imported crude and thereby eased pressure on oil markets, but the sweeping causal claim that it saved the world or prevented the largest oil shock in history cannot be established from the available evidence.
-
Trump and Xi held a one-on-one summit in May.
Donald Trump and Xi Jinping held a two-day summit in Beijing on May 14–15, 2026, including bilateral meetings.
-
The next Saxony-Anhalt state election is in September 2026.
The state parliament of Saxony-Anhalt was last elected in June 2021. Since the legislative term in Saxony-Anhalt is five years, the next election is scheduled for 2026.
Video Is the AfD a threat to Germany? Mehdi Hasan & Maximilian Krah | Head to Head
Sources used for this check
-
AccurateSpeaker not confirmed
“But three weeks after it was signed, Trump declared the ceasefire "over" after Iranian attacks on ships in Hormuz, and US strikes in response.”
Trump later declared the ceasefire over after attacks involving ships in the Strait of Hormuz and U.S. strikes in response.
Contemporaneous reporting describes the June ceasefire arrangement collapsing after attacks on shipping in Hormuz and renewed U.S. strikes; reports also state that Trump declared the arrangement no longer in effect in July.
-
AccurateSpeaker not confirmed
“he would use Iranian assets held by the US to pay for "any damages to Ships, Cargo, or anything related thereto".”
Donald Trump said Iranian assets held by the United States would pay for damage to ships and cargo.
Trump publicly stated that damages to ships, cargo, or related items would be paid from Iranian money in U.S. possession and control.
Article US to use frozen Iranian assets to fund war damages
Sources used for this check
-
New polling shows Trump's 'forever wars' dragging down Republicans and boosting Democrats.
The transcript does not identify the poll, pollster, sample, dates, or specific results, so this broad polling claim cannot be independently verified from the information provided.
-
The Trump administration is launching a nuclear program in Saudi Arabia.
The United States and Saudi Arabia did sign a nuclear-cooperation agreement for a civilian nuclear-energy program. Calling it simply a 'nuclear program' omits the agreement's civilian framing and the continuing dispute over whether it permits uranium enrichment.
-
Trump started two forever wars: a war with Iran and a trade war with everyone, and they are bankrupting the country.
The United States was engaged in an ongoing war with Iran in the reported period, and Trump's tariff policies have been described as a trade war. However, 'forever wars' and 'bankrupting the country' are political characterizations rather than established factual descriptions, and the transcript provides no evidence that either policy was literally bankrupting the United States.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Trump told Axios that he was considering a massive attack on Iran, bigger than ever before, because Iran had not received enough pain.
Axios reported on July 23, 2026 that Trump said he was considering a 'massive attack' on Iran that would be 'bigger than ever before' and said the Iranian regime had not received enough pain.
-
Trump went to Dover Air Force Base to witness the dignified transfer of four Americans killed in the war.
The Army, Associated Press, and Reuters reported that Trump attended a July 22, 2026 dignified-transfer ceremony at Dover for four U.S. service members killed in the Middle East during the Iran war.
-
Trump referred to Jon Ossoff as “Pinky Herman” or otherwise confused the name of Pee-wee Herman in a Truth Social post, and later used “Pee-wee Herman.”
Trump’s Truth Social posts compared Ossoff to Pee-wee Herman, while reports documented the apparent “Pinky Herman” misstatement or gaffe in subsequent remarks.
-
In a May Politico poll, about half of MAGA voters said the Iran war was worth its economic costs, while in the latest poll only about one-third said so.
The Politico/Public First polling project reported that 50% of MAGA voters viewed the war as worth its economic costs in May, compared with just over one-third in the July poll.
-
A person close to the White House told Politico that Trump was fully aware that the victory he wanted was politically impossible.
Politico was reported to have published this statement from an anonymous source close to the White House, but the underlying claim about Trump’s private awareness cannot be independently verified.
-
Trump has repeatedly threatened to bomb Iranian bridges and power plants but has not carried out those threats.
Trump did repeatedly threaten Iranian infrastructure, but reporting indicates that the United States subsequently struck at least some Iranian bridges and infrastructure, so the blanket claim that he did not do so is inaccurate.
-
Trump has made these kinds of threats 100 times.
The transcript gives “100 times” as an emphatic estimate, but no precise definition or documented count establishes that Trump made this exact type of threat 100 times.
-
The Trump administration was considering occupying or blockading Kharg Island, along with possible action involving Iranian islands, to pressure Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.
Axios reported that the administration was considering plans to occupy or blockade Kharg Island to pressure Iran to reopen the strait. This supports the claim that such an island-seizure option was under consideration, though it does not establish that seizing the islands would actually succeed in opening the strait.
-
Trump reached a deal allowing Saudi Arabia to pursue a civilian nuclear program, potentially including uranium enrichment, and said it would be conditional on Saudi Arabia normalizing relations with Israel.
A U.S.-Saudi civilian nuclear agreement was signed, and reporting indicated it could permit a future Saudi enrichment facility after further study. However, Trump appeared to add the Israeli-normalization condition after the agreement was signed, while publicly denying that the deal itself included uranium enrichment.
-
Trump added a requirement that Saudi Arabia normalize relations with Israel, even though that condition was not in the agreement as originally announced.
Reports described Trump’s normalization demand as a new condition announced one day after the agreement was signed, creating uncertainty about the pact’s status.
-
Saudi Arabia is an extremely repressive, non-democratic regime.
Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy that restricts political rights and civil liberties, and major human-rights organizations document continuing arbitrary detention and repression.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Susan Collins, Jon Husted, and Dan Sullivan are Republican senators facing elections in November 2026.
All three are Republican senators associated with Senate races scheduled for November 3, 2026: Maine, Ohio, and Alaska, respectively.
-
Attaching government funding to a reconciliation package could allow it to pass the Senate with 51 votes.
Budget reconciliation measures are generally subject to a simple-majority threshold in the Senate, allowing passage without the 60 votes ordinarily needed to overcome a filibuster, assuming the provisions satisfy reconciliation rules.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
The Senate was divided 53–47, and adding Senator John Fetterman's vote would give Republicans 54 votes; therefore they could lose three votes and still reach 50, with the vice president breaking a tie.
The arithmetic is correct for a 53-member Republican caucus and a 47-member Democratic/independent opposition, with Fetterman providing a possible 54th vote. A simple-majority vote requires 50 votes when the vice president can cast the deciding tie-breaker in a 100-member Senate.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Trump announced a new 50% tariff on most imports from Canada, including wine, hockey sticks, and cement.
Trump did impose additional 50% tariffs on selected categories of Canadian imports, including wine, hockey sticks, and cement, but the measures did not cover most Canadian imports generally.
-
Trump announced tariffs as high as 200% on imported generic drugs within a few years, with the policy intended to push drug manufacturers to produce in the United States by 2028.
Trump announced a plan for a 100% tariff on imported generic drugs beginning in August 2028, rising to 200% after one year, and described the purpose as encouraging manufacturers to relocate production to the United States.
-
TrumpRx is presented as a major discount on prescription drugs, but it is not actually a significant discount being offered to Americans.
TrumpRx does offer discounts on some prescription medicines, including manufacturer-backed reductions. However, independent analyses found that many listed prices were comparable to or already available through services such as GoodRx, so portraying the program as wholly not a discount is misleading.
-
Trump imposed tariffs on Canada because of smoke from Canadian wildfires.
Trump later threatened additional tariffs over wildfire smoke, but the major tariffs discussed in the passage were imposed for stated trade and national-security reasons, including alleged discriminatory treatment of U.S. products. Smoke was a subsequent justification or threat, not the sole explanation for the earlier tariff measures.
-
Trump refuses to sign a bipartisan housing bill in order to prevent people from voting.
Trump did refuse to sign the bipartisan housing bill as a protest over Congress's failure to pass the SAVE America Act, a restrictive voting bill. The claim that this was to prevent people from voting is a characterization of the voting bill's alleged effects rather than the stated immediate reason for withholding his signature.
-
Trump started a war, and the war is unpopular and bankrupting the country.
The United States did launch major military operations against Iran in March 2026, so the reference to a war is grounded in a real event. However, calling it definitively 'unpopular' and 'bankrupting the country' is either dependent on contested polling or an unsupported exaggeration; the sources establish substantial costs and opposition but not national bankruptcy.
-
Trump has made $2 billion since he has been in office.
Available reporting shows that Trump's reported assets increased substantially, but it does not establish that he personally made $2 billion in income since taking office. Confusing an increase in estimated wealth or asset values with earnings makes the claim unsupported and materially misleading.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
A Gallup poll showed that 70% of Americans would not want a data center built in their local community, and more than two-thirds of voters oppose data centers in their communities.
Gallup reported in May 2026 that about seven in ten Americans would oppose having a data center built where they live. The poll also found majority opposition across major party groups, supporting the broader statement that more than two-thirds oppose such construction.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Majorities of voters think the pace at which data centers are being built nationally is happening too fast.
Available polling confirms substantial public opposition to data centers and concern about rapid expansion, but I could not verify this exact national polling result about the pace of construction.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Large majorities of voters, in some cases two-thirds, believe data centers are leading to higher electricity and utility costs.
Multiple recent surveys report that roughly two-thirds of respondents believe data centers would raise local electricity prices or otherwise increase utility costs.
-
Voters think data centers are poisoning their water and are bad for their communities.
Polling and research document concerns about water consumption, water capacity, environmental effects and quality of life, but the evidence does not establish that data centers generally poison water. The statement conflates perceived risks and localized concerns with demonstrated widespread contamination.
-
Most voters do not buy the arguments about data-center job creation and economic growth.
Recent polling finds significant skepticism and concern, but it also finds that nearly two-thirds of respondents believe data centers create long-term jobs and boost economic growth. The claim overstates voter rejection of those arguments.
-
Opposition to data centers is a bipartisan issue that unites Democrats and Republicans.
National Gallup polling shows majorities of Democrats, Republicans and independents oppose constructing AI data centers in their local areas, although opposition is stronger among Democrats.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
The Trump administration's policy is to build a data center on every corner.
The administration has issued orders to accelerate permitting, financing and development of large AI data-center infrastructure, but there is no literal policy to build one on every corner. That wording is political hyperbole.
-
Billionaire AI-company owners have told the Trump administration that this data-center expansion is what they want, and the administration is acting for that reason.
AI companies and technology executives have publicly supported expanded infrastructure, but the specific claim about billionaire owners directing administration policy and the asserted motive is not directly verifiable from reliable evidence.
-
Democrats have generally been overly cautious about data centers because they fear AI super PACs spending hundreds of millions of dollars against them.
This is a claim about politicians' motivations and the effect of anticipated political spending. I found no reliable evidence establishing that this is the principal reason Democrats have been cautious or confirming the stated spending threat.
-
Arguments about increasing the local tax base and economic growth have some purchase with voters.
Recent polling finds that many voters associate data centers with long-term jobs, economic growth and local tax benefits, even while expressing concerns about costs and environmental effects.
-
Voters have conflicted views of AI: they are deeply concerned, but some are optimistic it could benefit the country if properly regulated and therefore hesitate to stop development immediately.
This accurately summarizes the mixed pattern found in public-opinion research: substantial concern about AI and its effects coexists with expectations of possible economic or societal benefits and support for regulation rather than an absolute halt.
-
Latino voters are more positive toward AI and data centers than the population as a whole, or at least more open to their potential for economic growth and job opportunities.
Available polling confirms that Latinos have mixed views about AI, but the transcript does not identify the specific poll or provide figures demonstrating that Latino voters are more positive than the overall population specifically on AI and data centers.
-
Emerson found Democrats 11 points ahead on the generic congressional ballot, Pew found them 6 points ahead, and Fox News found them 7 points ahead; Fox's poll showed Democrats at 53%, the highest share either party had received in its generic-ballot polling since 1996.
The July 2026 Emerson poll reported an 11-point Democratic advantage, and the contemporaneous Fox News poll reported a 7-point advantage with Democrats at 53%. Reporting on the Fox poll states that 53% was the highest share either party had reached in Fox generic-ballot polling since 1996; the transcript's Pew figure is also consistent with contemporaneous poll reporting.
-
In the Fox News poll, Democrats were more trusted on income inequality by 22 points, health care by 21, inflation by 10, the economy by 9, foreign policy by 7, and immigration shifted from an 8-point Republican advantage in April to a 1-point Democratic advantage.
The reported Fox News poll results match these issue-by-issue margins, including the change from an 8-point Republican advantage on immigration in April to a 1-point Democratic advantage in the newer poll.
-
In 1996, Democrats picked up about three House seats, while in 2018 Trump had an advantage on the economy and Democrats picked up 40 House seats.
The 2018 portions are broadly correct: Democrats gained 40 House seats and contemporary polling showed Republicans with an advantage on handling the economy. But Democrats' net House gain in the 1996 election was about two seats, not three; three seats were lost by Republicans in some tallies, with complications from an independent who caucused with Republicans.
-
In a Fox News poll, Republicans had only a seven-point advantage among white voters without a college degree on the economy.
The June 2026 Fox News poll confirms widespread dissatisfaction with the economy and provides several demographic results, but the available published results do not show this specific seven-point Republican advantage among white non-college voters on the economy.
-
Donald Trump won white voters without a college degree by 34 points in the 2024 presidential election.
Multiple analyses of 2024 exit-poll data report that Trump carried white voters without a college degree by 34 percentage points.
-
The DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee met to determine the early-state primary calendar for 2028, with South Carolina, Nevada, New Hampshire and Michigan among the likely states before Super Tuesday, and New Mexico or Virginia possibly being added.
The committee did meet, but its July 2026 proposal selected six states for the early window: South Carolina, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Michigan and Virginia. Thus, presenting four states as the likely set and the other two as merely possible became outdated or incomplete by the time of the committee’s decision.
-
South Carolina and Nevada were competing to become the first state in the 2028 Democratic presidential nominating calendar, amid a long-running conflict between Black and Latino Democratic leaders.
Contemporary reporting described South Carolina and Nevada as the leading contenders for the first 2028 Democratic contest and characterized the dispute as a racially fraught conflict involving Black and Latino Democratic leaders.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Forty-nine people are on the committee that decides the early Democratic primary calendar.
Reporting on the 2028 calendar process identifies the Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws Committee as a 49-member body responsible for recommending the early-state lineup.
-
In the 2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses, there was still no winner declared when people left Iowa the day after the caucuses.
The caucuses occurred on February 3, 2020, but technical problems and reporting inconsistencies delayed results; contemporary reporting noted that no official winner had been declared by the following morning.
-
The primary calendar cannot simply be changed in some states because the election date has already been set by the state legislature.
State law or legislative control can constrain when a primary is held, but the statement is too broad: primary scheduling authority varies by state, and in New Hampshire the secretary of state has statutory authority to set the presidential primary date.
-
New Hampshire law requires its presidential primary to be held at least seven days before any similar election in another state, effectively requiring it to go first.
New Hampshire Revised Statutes §653:9 requires the secretary of state to schedule the presidential primary seven or more days before any other state's similar election, or on the second Tuesday in March, whichever is earlier.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
New Hampshire held its Democratic primary first in 2024 and initially received no delegates under the DNC rules.
The January 23, 2024 primary was held in violation of the DNC-approved calendar and did not initially award delegates, but the DNC later seated New Hampshire's full delegation after a separate party-run delegate-selection process. Thus, saying New Hampshire ultimately got no delegates is incorrect.
-
Nevada is a vote-by-mail state where ballots postmarked by Election Day can still be counted after Election Day.
Nevada generally mails ballots to active registered voters, and official election guidance states that mailed ballots postmarked on or before Election Day may be counted if received by the statutory deadline afterward. The statement omits the receipt deadline but is accurate in substance.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Florida and Michigan moved their 2008 Democratic primaries earlier than permitted by DNC rules, and their primaries initially had no recognized delegates.
Both states moved their primaries earlier in violation of DNC rules, and the DNC initially stripped their delegations. However, the Rules and Bylaws Committee later seated both delegations with each delegate receiving a half vote, so the blanket statement that the primaries simply did not count or resulted in no delegates is incomplete.
-
The chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party said in The New York Times that putting Nevada first would say something about how the Democratic Party views Black voters.
CNN’s transcript reports that South Carolina Democratic chair Christale Spain told The New York Times that elevating Nevada over South Carolina would be interpreted through the lens of the party’s relationship with Black voters. The transcript paraphrases rather than quotes her exact wording.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Black voters make up 15% of Nevada’s electorate.
A Reuters report cited Black voters as about 15% of Nevada’s 2008 caucus electorate, but that figure is not a general, current measure of Nevada’s electorate. Broader demographic estimates have placed Nevada’s Black population closer to 10%, so presenting 15% without specifying the election or electorate is misleading.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Black political power in the United States has been decimated in significant ways by the Supreme Court, particularly regarding congressional representation.
The Supreme Court has issued decisions affecting voting-rights enforcement and redistricting, but the most directly relevant recent decision, Allen v. Milligan (2023), required Alabama to add a second majority-Black congressional opportunity district rather than reducing Black representation. The broad claim that the Court itself has decimated Black congressional power is therefore an overgeneralization.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Majority-minority congressional districts, mostly Black districts across the South, have been written out of existence, and there will be almost no such districts left across the South.
Recent redistricting litigation has eliminated or threatened some majority-Black districts, but it has not nearly eliminated them across the South. Federal courts have also required additional Black-opportunity districts, including in Alabama, and multiple Southern states still have majority-Black congressional districts.
-
Democratic presidential candidates receive a bonus delegate when they perform above a certain level in a congressional district, and Obama and Clinton could claim all five delegates in heavily Black Southern districts.
Democratic delegate allocation has used viability thresholds and congressional-district-based allocations, and some states had five pledged delegates per district. However, the transcript conflates district delegate allocation with a general 'bonus delegate' rule and does not establish that heavily Black districts uniformly awarded five additional or bonus delegates to a candidate.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
South Carolina plays no role whatsoever in the presidential general election.
South Carolina has generally been safely Republican in recent presidential elections and is not usually treated as a competitive presidential battleground. But 'no role whatsoever' is too absolute: the state still contributes electoral votes, affects campaign strategy and turnout, and has competitive down-ballot races.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
About one in five Democratic primary voters in Michigan is Black.
Recent reporting describes Black voters as making up approximately one-fifth of Michigan's Democratic primary electorate. The precise share varies by election and measurement method, so 'about one in five' is an appropriate approximation.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
On Tuesday evening, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino posted a roughly one-minute video on his official Twitter account showing the Oval Office and admiring Donald Trump's interior decorating.
Scavino did post a video showcasing the Oval Office's gold additions and model airplanes, but reporting identifies the platform as Instagram and the posting date as Wednesday, July 22, 2026, not Tuesday evening on Twitter.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
A new Washington Post poll found that about two-thirds of Americans were unhappy about Trump's renovations and other projects in Washington, D.C., with opposition led mostly by Democrats and independents.
A July 2026 Washington Post-Ipsos poll found that 65% of Americans were dissatisfied or upset about Trump's ballroom, Reflecting Pool, and triumphal-arch projects. Negative views were especially prevalent among Democrats and independents: about 90% of Democrats and 73% of independents viewed the projects negatively.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
A Washington Post-Ipsos poll found that 67% of Democrats chose “upset” as their descriptor for Trump's Washington projects, while 31% of Republicans chose “enthusiastic.”
The poll asked about Trump's White House ballroom, triumphal arch and Reflecting Pool projects and reported exactly these figures for Democrats and Republicans.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Hillary Clinton lost Georgia by about five percentage points in 2016, while Joe Biden won Georgia in 2020.
Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton in Georgia by roughly 5.1 points in 2016, and Biden defeated Trump there by 11,779 votes, or about 0.23 points, in 2020.
Podcast Trump's Wars Are Bankrupting America
Sources used for this check
-
Hillary Clinton lost North Carolina by about one percentage point in 2016, and Donald Trump won North Carolina in both 2020 and 2024.
Trump did win North Carolina in both 2020 and 2024, but Clinton's 2016 loss was about 3.7 percentage points, not approximately one point. Trump's 2020 margin was about 1.3 points.
-
Xi concluded that civil society, press freedom, legal independence and democratic-governance discussion threatened the Communist Party's Leninist control, prompting crackdowns including on religion.
The 2013 ideological directive explicitly characterized civil society, Western press values, constitutional democracy and judicial independence as threats to one-party rule. However, attributing this entire analysis personally to Xi and presenting it as the direct cause of every religious crackdown goes beyond publicly established evidence.
Podcast What Xi Jinping Wants
