claimpit
← All receipts
Fact-Checker/Videos
Video fact-check

Top Jewish Voices in HEATED Debate On Dwindling Israel Support

88 claims checked · Published September 2026 · Checked September 2026

Checked by an AI model against live web sources — how this works · report an error

Watch on YouTube Jump to claims ↓
The map

Who said what, and about what

A bounded sample, most disputed claims first — the full list is belowEvery row is reachable by scrolling its column · search matches claim text, verdicts, people, topics and sources · hover a row to trace its chain, click one to pin its detail

The receipts

Every claim, checked

  1. Claim 1
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 0:26

    Israel is an American ally.

    The U.S. State Department describes Israel as a longtime ally of the United States.

    Sources

  2. Claim 2
    Accurate90% confidence▶ 0:31
    “We know from the poll American Jews are very divided.”

    American Jews are very divided on Israel-related questions.

    Polling and reporting have found substantial divisions among U.S. Jews over how the United States should engage with the Israeli government.

    Sources

  3. Claim 3
    Accurate94% confidence▶ 1:06
    “American support for Israel has hit historic lows, especially among Democrats, of whom 66% think the US is too supportive of Israel, according to a recent poll.”

    American support for Israel has reached historic lows, particularly among Democrats.

    Recent polling found that Israel’s favorability among Americans was at its lowest level since 2000, while Democrats recorded historically negative views in Gallup polling. A separate ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll found 66% of Democrats said the United States was too supportive of Israel.

    The claim uses “support” broadly; I judged it against polling measures of favorability, sympathy, and perceived U.S. support for Israel, rather than support for Israel’s existence or the U.S.-Israel alliance.

    Sources

  4. Claim 4
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 1:08
    “of whom 66% think the US is too supportive of Israel, according to a recent poll.”

    Sixty-six percent of Democrats think the United States is too supportive of Israel.

    The ABC News/Washington Post/Ipsos poll reported that 66% of Democrats said U.S. support for Israel was too high.

    Sources

  5. Claim 5
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 1:20
    “Joel Rubin was a State Department official under Barack Obama, was the Bernie Sanders 2020 campaign's Jewish outreach director, and is the author of the new book Saving Democratic Foreign Policy.”

    Joel Rubin was a State Department official under Barack Obama, directed Jewish outreach for Bernie Sanders’s 2020 campaign, and authored Saving Democratic Foreign Policy.

    The State Department identifies Rubin as an Obama-era deputy assistant secretary, while The Free Press identifies him as Sanders’s 2020 Jewish outreach director and the author of Saving Democratic Foreign Policy.

    Sources

  6. Claim 6
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 1:30
    “He's also the author of a recent piece in Barry Weiss's The Free Press, headlined I Worked for Bernie Sanders. The Democratic Party is turning against the Jews.”

    Joel Rubin wrote a recent Free Press article headlined “I Worked for Bernie Sanders. The Democratic Party Is Turning Against the Jews.”

    The Free Press published an article by Joel Rubin with that headline on August 21, 2026.

    Sources

  7. Claim 7
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 1:42
    “Peter Binart, author of the Binart notebook on Substack and the book Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza.”

    Peter Beinart authored the book Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza.

    Peter Beinart is identified as the author of Being Jewish After the Destruction of Gaza: A Reckoning.

    Sources

  8. Claim 8
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 2:52
    “there are elections coming up.”

    Israeli elections were upcoming at the time of the statement.

    Israel’s next national election was scheduled for October 27, 2026, so elections were indeed upcoming when the statement was made.

    Sources

  9. Claim 9
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 3:38
    “I'm of the view that anti-ionists are clearly hostile to the idea that the state of Israel should exist”

    Anti-Zionists are clearly hostile to the idea that the State of Israel should exist.

    The claim depends on undefined and disputed meanings of both “anti-Zionist” and “the state of Israel should exist.” Anti-Zionist groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace describe opposition to Zionism in terms of rejecting Jewish ethno-nationalism while declining to prescribe a single political outcome, so the statement cannot be applied uniformly to all anti-Zionists.

    Sources

    • 1Our Approach to Zionism

      RefutesJewish anti-Zionists span a political and religious spectrum, from religious and secular progressives who view opposition to Zionism as an anti-racist praxis, to ultra-Orthodox Jews who oppose Jewish dominion until the time of the Messiah, to anarchist Jews who oppose the very concept of nation-states, Jewish or otherwise.

    • 2FAQ

      RefutesWe really don’t believe it is our place to tell Palestinians and Israelis what the best political outcome is toward a just, equitable, and sustainable peace.

  10. Claim 10
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 4:15
    “A system of which I believe gives Jews rights that are superior to the rights that Palestinians have.”

    Israel’s political and legal system gives Jews rights superior to those Palestinians have.

    There is authoritative evidence that Israel’s Basic Law grants Jewish people a unique national right of self-determination and that Palestinians in the occupied territory face systemic discriminatory restrictions. However, the claim presents a broad comparison of “rights” across an undefined population without distinguishing Israeli citizens from Palestinians living under occupation, which creates a potentially misleading impression about one single uniform legal system.

    Omits: The statement does not specify whether it refers to Palestinian citizens of Israel or Palestinians in the occupied Palestinian territory, who are subject to different legal and political statuses; it also does not identify which rights are being compared.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1Full text of Basic Law: Israel as the Nation State of the Jewish People

      SupportsThe actualization of the right of national self-determination in the state of Israel is unique to the Jewish people.

    • 2Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024

      SupportsAccordingly, the Court is of the view that the régime of comprehensive restrictions imposed by Israel on Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory constitutes systemic discrimination based on, inter alia, race, religion or ethnic origin

    • 3Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024

      BackgroundSince the start of the occupation, Israel has extended its legal domain in the West Bank, which has resulted in far-reaching changes to the applicable law and, in practice, two sets of applicable law: military law and Israeli domestic law, which has been

  11. Claim 11
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 4:47
    “It's a UN member state”

    Israel is a member state of the United Nations.

    The United Nations lists Israel as a member state, admitted on May 11, 1949.

    Sources

  12. Claim 12
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 4:51
    “has 10 million plus”

    Israel has more than 10 million people.

    Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics reported that the country’s population exceeded 10 million at the end of 2024.

    Sources

  13. Claim 13
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 4:51
    “of which about 20 25% aren't Jewish”

    Approximately 20% to 25% of Israel’s population is not Jewish.

    Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics reported that Arabs made up approximately 21.4% of the country’s population at the end of 2024. The agency separately grouped Jews with “Others,” so the exact non-Jewish share depends on how that category is counted, but the stated 20–25% range is broadly supported.

    Sources

  14. Claim 14
    Misleading93% confidence▶ 6:05
    “Just look at ICE roaming our streets picking people up. Often times we're American citizens.”

    ICE frequently picks up people who are American citizens.

    ICE has mistakenly arrested or detained some people who were or appeared to be U.S. citizens. However, the available GAO data establish that such cases occurred, not that American citizens were frequently among the people ICE picked up.

    Omits: The statement omits the frequency and denominator: GAO documented 674 ICE arrests and 121 detentions of potential U.S. citizens from fiscal year 2015 through March 2020, but did not find that American citizens were a frequent share of ICE arrests.

    The intensifier “Often times” was judged as a frequency claim, not merely as an assertion that such incidents have occurred.

    Sources

  15. Claim 15
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 6:44
    “when you have you have about 15 members of the Knesset who are are Arab citizens of Israel”

    About 15 members of the Knesset are Arab citizens of Israel.

    The number of Arab-citizen Knesset members changes after elections and through replacements. A source records 15 Israeli Arabs elected to the 24th Knesset in March 2021, while the transcript’s reference to an upcoming election does not establish that this was the intended time frame.

    The relevant time frame is unspecified. The figure was true in some past Knesset compositions, but the transcript does not identify which Knesset or election it refers to.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  16. Claim 16
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 7:06
    “most of the Palestinians who live under Israeli control today don't have citizenship and can't become citizens, right? Those are the communities in the West Bank.”

    Most Palestinians living under Israeli control today do not have Israeli citizenship and cannot become Israeli citizens, particularly Palestinians in the West Bank.

    Most Palestinian residents of the occupied West Bank are not Israeli citizens, and their identity documents do not confer Israeli citizenship. But “can't become citizens” is too absolute because citizenship and residency rules differ by status and exceptional legal pathways exist.

    Omits: The statement presents inability to become citizens as categorical, while the legal status varies by location and individual circumstances; it also does not distinguish Israeli citizens, permanent residents, and Palestinians subject to Palestinian Authority jurisdiction.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  17. Claim 17
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 7:15
    “The West Bank in Gaza and Israel Israel was founded in 1948. It's controlled those areas since 1967.”

    Israel was founded in 1948 and has controlled the West Bank and Gaza since 1967.

    Israel declared independence in 1948 and occupied the West Bank and Gaza during the 1967 war. However, saying it has controlled both areas continuously in the same way since 1967 is misleading because Gaza's status and the form of Israeli control changed substantially after the 2005 disengagement.

    Omits: The statement omits that Israel withdrew its permanent ground forces and settlements from Gaza in 2005; its continuing control over Gaza is described by international bodies as indirect or de facto control, while the West Bank remains under Israeli occupation and control.

    The intensifier "controlled ... since 1967" is judged as a continuous-control claim covering both the West Bank and Gaza, not merely the historical fact that Israel captured both territories in 1967.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  18. Claim 18
    Accurate95% confidence▶ 7:22
    “the vast majority of the time that Israel has been a state, most of the Palestinians is controlled legally cannot be citizens of the state in which they live in the West Bank. They live under a completely different legal system.”

    Most Palestinians in the West Bank are legally unable to be citizens of Israel and live under a different legal system from Israeli settlers.

    Palestinian residents of the West Bank generally are not Israeli citizens, while Israeli settlers there are Israeli citizens. The U.S. State Department and Human Rights Watch describe Palestinians and settlers as subject in practice to different legal regimes, including military law for Palestinians and Israeli civil law for settlers.

    Sources

  19. Claim 19
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 7:40
    “most of the land in Israel proper, I'm not talking about the West Bank, Gaza, now is controlled by the Israel Land Authority, which gives almost half its seats to the Jewish National Fund, which is why Palestinian municipal majority municipalities in Israel basically can never get land to expand.”

    The Israel Land Authority controls most land in Israel, about half of its governing body is connected to the Jewish National Fund, and this prevents Palestinian-majority municipalities from expanding.

    Human Rights Watch reports that the Israeli state controls 93 percent of the land, that the Israel Land Authority manages it, and that almost half of the governing body belongs to the JNF. It also reports severe restrictions on Palestinian municipal expansion, but the transcript overstates the evidence by turning those restrictions into an exceptionless causal claim.

    Omits: The statement omits that the evidence supports the land-control and JNF-composition figures but does not establish the absolute causal claim that Palestinian-majority municipalities can “basically never” obtain land to expand.

    The intensifier “basically can never” was judged as an effectively absolute claim about Palestinian-majority municipalities.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1Israel: Discriminatory Land Policies Hem in Palestinians

      SupportsThe Israeli state directly controls 93 percent of the land in the country, including occupied East Jerusalem. A government agency, the Israel Land Authority (ILA), manages and allocates these state lands. Almost half the members of its governing body belong to the Jewish National Fund (JNF), whose explicit mandate is to develop and lease land for Jews and not any other segment of the population.

    • 2Israel: Discriminatory Land Policies Hem in Palestinians

      SupportsDecades of land confiscations and discriminatory planning policies have confined many Palestinian citizens to densely populated towns and villages that have little room to expand.

  20. Claim 20
    Accurate97% confidence▶ 8:37
    “the leader of an Islamist party take a Zionist is his number two to compete in the upcoming elections.”

    The leader of an Islamist party selected a Zionist as the party’s second candidate for an upcoming Israeli election.

    In September 2026, Ra’am leader Mansour Abbas placed former Yesh Atid lawmaker Yoav Segalovitz, described as a Jewish liberal Zionist, second on Ra’am’s electoral list for the October 2026 election.

    Sources

  21. Claim 21
    Accurate97% confidence▶ 9:25
    “the West Bank uh uh citizens the the Palestinian population there many of them were Jordanian citizens up until 1967.”

    Many Palestinians in the West Bank were Jordanian citizens until 1967.

    Jordan annexed the West Bank after 1948 and Palestinians living there became Jordanian citizens. This citizenship arrangement ended after Israel captured the West Bank in 1967.

    Sources

  22. Claim 22
    False50% confidence▶ 9:31
    “Sam and Gaza Egyptian citizens the”

    Residents of Gaza were Egyptian citizens.

    Egypt administered the Gaza Strip from 1948 to 1967, but administration did not confer Egyptian citizenship on Gaza's Palestinian residents. The transcript's wording is grammatically incomplete, but read as asserting Egyptian citizenship it is false.

    Sources

    • 1Facts About Gaza

      RefutesPre-1967: Gazans were denied Egyptian citizenship - only a few of them were even allowed to enter Egypt.

    • 2Racial Discrimination Convention – Consideration of Jordan's periodic reports

      BackgroundThese displaced persons from Gaza who settled in Jordan in 1967 were treated differently from the displaced persons from the West Bank who held, and still hold, Jordanian nationality since the Gaza Strip, being under Egyptian administration, was excluded from the unification of the two Banks after 1948.

  23. Claim 23
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 9:38
    “the Jordanist King Hussein terminated that citizenship separated his claim in the late 80s”

    King Hussein ended Jordanian citizenship for West Bank residents in the late 1980s.

    Jordan's 1988 disengagement regulations treated West Bank residents as Palestinian rather than Jordanian citizens, and Jordan simultaneously ended its legal and administrative claim to the West Bank.

    Sources

  24. Claim 24
    False50% confidence▶ 9:38
    “the Jordanist King Hussein terminated that citizenship separated his claim in the late 80s uh after Yaser and kicked out Yaser Arafat as as a sort of a an interlocutor as well.”

    King Hussein expelled Yasser Arafat from Jordan in the late 1980s.

    Arafat's expulsion from Jordan occurred during Black September in 1970–1971, not after Hussein's late-1980s decision to disengage from the West Bank. The transcript conflates two separate events.

    Sources

  25. Claim 25
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 10:07
    “actually international law has been very consistent about occupation of the West Bank and Gaza.”

    International law has been very consistent in treating the West Bank and Gaza as occupied territories.

    The West Bank, including East Jerusalem, is broadly treated by international institutions as occupied territory. Gaza's status has been legally disputed since 2005, so describing international law as uniformly consistent about both territories overstates the degree of agreement.

    Omits: The claim omits the continuing legal dispute over Gaza's status after Israel's 2005 withdrawal: Israel has argued that it no longer occupies Gaza, while international bodies have applied differing formulations concerning effective control and occupation.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  26. Claim 26
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 10:12
    “The US government until Donald Trump was very consistent that these were occupied territories.”

    The United States consistently regarded the West Bank and Gaza as occupied territories until Donald Trump's presidency.

    Earlier U.S. administrations consistently used occupation terminology, but the claim implies that Trump's administration changed the underlying U.S. position on the status of the West Bank and Gaza. In 2018, a State Department spokesperson said that the U.S. view of their status had not changed, even as the administration later changed its position on settlement legality and sometimes avoided the word 'occupied.'

    Omits: The Trump administration did alter some terminology and settlement policy, but a 2018 State Department briefing said the U.S. view of the status of the West Bank and Gaza had not changed.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  27. Claim 27
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 10:15
    “So, they are occupied peoples.”

    Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza are occupied peoples.

    The characterization is well established for the West Bank, but applying it without qualification to Gaza elides the continuing legal dispute over whether and how occupation law applies there after Israel's withdrawal of permanent ground forces and settlements in 2005.

    Omits: The statement presents the status of Palestinians in both territories as unqualified, although Gaza's legal status after 2005 is disputed and some international formulations focus on Israel's degree of effective control rather than applying an identical occupation analysis to Gaza and the West Bank.

    Sources

  28. Claim 28
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 11:28
    “I'm from Pittsburgh from Squirrel Hill, the neighborhood that saw the worst terror attack against Jews in the United States committed by white supremacists”

    The Squirrel Hill neighborhood experienced the deadliest attack against Jews in United States history, carried out by a white supremacist.

    The October 27, 2018 Tree of Life synagogue shooting in Squirrel Hill killed 11 people and is widely identified as the deadliest antisemitic attack against the U.S. Jewish community. The perpetrator, Robert Bowers, was identified and convicted as a white supremacist and antisemite.

    Sources

    • 1Antisemitism in American History

      SupportsOn October 27, 2018 — the most deadly day of violence against Jews to take place on American soil — a white supremacist, shouting “all Jews must die,” opened fire on worshippers of the three congregations meeting at the Tree of Life synagogue in the Squirrel Hill neighborhood of Pittsburgh, killing 11 and wounding six.

    • 2United States v. Robert Bowers

      BackgroundThe defendant was sentenced to death on 22 counts contained in the superseding indictment.

  29. Claim 29
    Unverifiable90% confidence▶ 11:32
    “when Donald Trump was fanning the flames of incitement that led to that mass slaughter in in my neighborhood.”

    Donald Trump's incitement led to the Tree of Life massacre.

    The phrase “fanning the flames of incitement” is not an agreed operational definition, and the asserted causal link is not established by the available official case record. Federal prosecutors documented Bowers's antisemitic beliefs and his own statements about Jews and HIAS, but did not establish that Trump's rhetoric caused the attack.

    Sources

    • 1Superseding Indictment of Robert Bowers

      BackgroundWhile inside the Tree of Life Synagogue, the defendant, ROBERT BOWERS, made statements conveying his anti-Semitic beliefs and indicating his desire to “kill Jews.”

    • 2United States v. Bowers

      BackgroundBowers’s hatred of Jewish people fueled his killing spree, as evidenced by his Gab posts, statements to SWAT officers, and statements to Dr. Rogers.

  30. Claim 30
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 12:07
    “that Graham Platiner guy, that Nazi tattoo on his chest, no problem. We're just going to ignore it.”

    The speaker says Bernie Sanders and his team treated Graham Platner's Nazi-linked chest tattoo as unimportant and decided to ignore it.

    Reliable reporting confirms that Graham Platner had a chest tattoo widely described as resembling the Nazi Totenkopf symbol, but I could not verify the more specific attribution that Sarah Sanders and Platner's team said it was "no problem" and should be ignored. The identities and wording in the transcript may also be mistranscribed.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  31. Claim 31
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 12:07
    “that Graham Platiner guy, that Nazi tattoo on his chest”

    Graham Platner had a chest tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol associated with the SS.

    Contemporary reporting described Platner's chest tattoo as resembling a Nazi SS symbol, specifically the Totenkopf or skull-and-crossbones imagery. The reporting also states that the tattoo was later covered.

    Sources

  32. Claim 32
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 12:17
    “candidates like Abdullah sayed and and even Zar Madani to a certain extent saying you can't be progressive and uh be a supporter of Israel.”

    The speaker attributes to Abdul El-Sayed and, to some extent, Zohran Mamdani the view that a person cannot be both progressive and a supporter of Israel.

    The attribution to Abdul El-Sayed is substantially grounded: he said every definition of a Jewish state entails illiberal values. Mamdani is also openly anti-Zionist and sharply critical of Israel, but AP reports that he supports Israel's right to exist, so the categorical formulation that progressives cannot support Israel overstates the documented positions.

    Omits: El-Sayed made statements intimating that Zionism is incompatible with progressivism, but Mamdani has also said he supports Israel's right to exist; the transcript turns their anti-Zionist or anti-Israeli-government positions into a categorical claim about all support for Israel.

    Sources

  33. Claim 33
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 13:23
    “supporting Israel, which has been declared an aparate state even by its own leading human rights organizations. But Selom and Yeshin along with Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International”

    Israel has been characterized as an apartheid state or regime by Israeli human-rights organizations, as well as by Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.

    Israeli organizations B’Tselem and Yesh Din have concluded that the Israeli regime or Israeli authorities' conduct meets the definition of apartheid, while Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have reached related findings. However, Human Rights Watch expressly says its report did not determine whether Israel is an “apartheid state,” so the transcript overstates and conflates the organizations' conclusions.

    Omits: The organizations generally describe Israeli authorities' policies, the Israeli-controlled regime, or the crime of apartheid—often in specific territories or under defined legal criteria—rather than issuing a formal declaration that Israel is an “apartheid state.” In addition, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International are international organizations, not Israeli organizations.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  34. Claim 34
    Contested50% confidence▶ 15:22
    “now for the last three years we've seen Israel carry out a genocide war crimes ethnic cleansing you can choose your phrase”

    Israel has carried out genocide, war crimes, and ethnic cleansing during the previous three years.

    This is an unresolved legal and institutional dispute rather than a settled factual finding. The ICC has issued warrants based on reasonable grounds for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, while UN bodies have advanced genocide and forcible-transfer findings or allegations; Israel rejects those characterizations, and the ICJ genocide case had not reached a final merits judgment in the sources reviewed.

    Concluded by The United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry and UN special-procedures experts have concluded or stated that Israel’s conduct may constitute genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, or forcible transfer; the International Criminal Court found reasonable grounds to believe Israeli leaders were responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity.Rejected or unresolved by The Government of Israel rejects the genocide allegation and maintains that its military actions comply with international law; the International Court of Justice recorded that Israel and South Africa hold opposite views on whether Israel’s conduct violates the Genocide Convention.

    The intensifier 'for the last three years' is relative to an undated recording, so the exact duration cannot be independently anchored; the verdict addresses the underlying legal characterization of Israel’s conduct.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Contested and the second Accurate. Recorded as Contested.

    Sources

  35. Claim 35
    Unverifiable89% confidence▶ 15:38
    “Genocide is what you know a lot of American Jews also say and scholars.”

    Many American Jews and scholars describe Israel’s conduct as genocide.

    The statement uses undefined quantities—'a lot' and 'scholars'—without specifying a population, threshold, survey, or scholarly census. Available polling shows that a substantial minority of American Jews have called Israel’s conduct genocide, and individual scholars have done so, but that evidence cannot establish the broader quantified assertion as phrased.

    Sources

  36. Claim 36
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 17:04
    “Israel is an American ally.”

    Israel is an ally of the United States.

    The United States officially describes Israel as a longtime ally and designates it a major non-NATO ally. That designation does not create an automatic mutual-defense obligation, but it supports the claim that Israel is an American ally in the ordinary and official sense.

    Sources

  37. Claim 37
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 18:24
    “90% of American Jews. Richie Torres is a supporter of Israel and I would happily kick him out of the body.”

    Ritchie Torres is a supporter of Israel.

    Torres's congressional website describes him as a “steadfast supporter and ally of Israel” and quotes him saying that he unequivocally stands with Israel.

    Sources

  38. Claim 38
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 18:40
    “Saudi Arabia is an ally of the US.”

    Saudi Arabia is an ally or strategic partner of the United States.

    The State Department has referred to Saudi Arabia as a close friend and ally and currently describes the bilateral relationship as a strategic partnership.

    Sources

  39. Claim 39
    Accurate100% confidence▶ 19:00

    Israel is an American ally.

    The United States formally designates Israel as a major non-NATO ally, and the State Department also explicitly calls Israel a longtime ally of the United States.

    Sources

  40. Claim 40
    Unverifiable90% confidence▶ 19:34
    “the most American Zionists are not Jews, right?”

    Most American Zionists are not Jews.

    The claim depends on an undefined and unmeasured population: “American Zionists.” Available evidence shows a very large Christian pro-Israel organization, but does not establish that Christians constitute more than half of all American Zionists.

    Sources

  41. Claim 41
    Unverifiable88% confidence▶ 19:37
    “most of America's supporters of in the larger group are Christians.”

    Most American supporters of Israel are Christians.

    The transcript's wording is grammatically incomplete, but the apparent claim that Christians form a majority of American supporters of Israel lacks a defined denominator and a representative national count. Evidence establishes substantial evangelical support, not that Christians are a majority of all American supporters.

    Sources

  42. Claim 42
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 20:16
    “Christians United for Israel is the largest Zionist group in the organ in the United States.”

    Christians United for Israel is the largest pro-Israel organization in the United States.

    Sources support CUFI being the largest Christian Zionist organization, and CUFI itself claims to be the largest pro-Israel organization. But “largest Zionist group” is not a clearly defined or independently measured category encompassing every U.S. Zionist organization.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

    • 1101: Christian Zionism

      BackgroundThe largest Christian Zionist organization in the U.S. by numbers is Christians United for Israel (CUFI), which claims over 10 million members and is headed by one of the most prominent Christian Zionist leaders, John Hagee.

    • 2Our Mission | Christians United for Israel

      BackgroundAs the largest pro-Israel organization in the United States, with over 10 million members, CUFI is the foremost Christian organization educating and empowering millions of Americans to speak and act with one voice in defense of Israel and the Jewish people.

  43. Claim 43
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 20:33
    “Christian Zionists are not the ones being harassed on college campuses. Christian Zionists are not the ones being targeted online for harassment.”

    Christian Zionists are not targeted for harassment on college campuses or online.

    Reports document harassment of Zionist and pro-Israel students and individuals, but the available sources do not establish whether Christian Zionists specifically have never or do not experience such harassment. The claim is therefore not confirmable as stated.

    The categorical wording “are not the ones” was judged as stated. The available evidence documents harassment of Zionists and pro-Israel students generally, but does not reliably identify the religious affiliation of every target.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

    • 1Anti-Israel Activism on U.S. Campuses, 2021-2022

      BackgroundAntisemitism also manifested when Zionists were verbally harassed or denigrated as inherently racist; or when pro-Israel and Zionist students were deemed unfit for participation in the campus community.

    • 2Two Years of Turmoil: The Strategic Evolution of Anti-Israel Activism on U.S. Campuses and 2025–2026 Challenges

      BackgroundThe campus environment surrounding the first and second anniversaries of the Hamas attack were particularly fraught, as anti-Israel protesters – some of whom openly celebrated the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust – routinely disrupted events organized or attended by Jewish and Israeli students to commemorate October 7 victims, and staged walkouts and protests that also featured overt support for the attack itself, Hamas, and other groups.

  44. Claim 44
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 20:45
    “But it's the Jewish Zionists that are being targeted.”

    Jewish Zionists are being targeted for harassment and campus hostility.

    The claim is a general assertion that Jewish Zionists are among those targeted, not that they are the only targets. Reports document harassment and intimidation directed at Jewish, Israeli, and Zionist individuals and organizations on campuses and online.

    Sources

  45. Claim 45
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 20:55
    “It's uh synagogues being targeted uh on a consistent basis for protest.”

    Synagogues were targeted in protest-related incidents and harassment in 2024.

    The claim does not specify a time period, geographic scope, or what qualifies as a "consistent basis." Without those definitions, it cannot be reliably confirmed or refuted as stated.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  46. Claim 46
    Accurate93% confidence▶ 21:43
    “And he's not Jewish.”

    John Fetterman is not Jewish.

    Contemporary biographical reporting identifies Senator John Fetterman as not Jewish. The statement is treated as referring to his religious or Jewish identity, rather than making a claim about distant ancestry.

    Sources

  47. Claim 47
    Unverifiable82% confidence▶ 22:45
    “And 90% of American Jews feel an affinity for the state of Israel or some level of support”

    Ninety percent of American Jews feel an affinity for Israel or have some level of support for it.

    The claim combines two undefined measures—"affinity" and "some level of support"—without identifying a survey or question wording. Pew has found that 82% say caring about Israel is important or essential to Jewish identity and 58% report emotional attachment, but those measures neither confirm nor directly refute the stated 90%.

    Sources

  48. Claim 48
    Accurate96% confidence▶ 23:25
    “there are a majority of American Jews do see uh a connection to the state of Israel as being as playing part of their Jewish identity.”

    A majority of American Jews see a connection to Israel as part of their Jewish identity.

    Pew Research Center found that 82% of U.S. Jewish adults said caring about Israel is an essential or important part of what being Jewish means to them. That is a clear majority and supports the claim as stated.

    Sources

  49. Claim 49
    Accurate90% confidence▶ 23:37
    “The land of Israel is absolutely central to Judaism.”

    The Land of Israel is central to Judaism.

    Jewish historical and rabbinic sources describe the Land of Israel as central to Jewish life, thought, liturgy, and religious aspiration. The claim concerns the land’s importance in Judaism and does not equate it with the modern State of Israel.

    Sources

  50. Claim 50
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 23:40
    “The state of Israel is not central to Judaism. It was only created in 1948.”

    The modern State of Israel was created in 1948.

    The State of Israel was declared on May 14, 1948, when David Ben-Gurion read the declaration establishing the state. The quoted sentence’s historical assertion about its creation date is accurate.

    Sources

    • 1Independence Day

      SupportsOn May 14, 1948 (5 Iyar, 5708) David Ben-Gurion read aloud the Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel (Israel’s Declaration of Independence) during a ceremony at Beit Dizengoff in Tel Aviv and signed it along with other members of the Provisional State Council.

  51. Claim 51
    Accurate97% confidence▶ 24:00
    “So there was a poll earlier this year which said that on the question of whether you support a Jewish state or a bational state, 54% said they supported two states, a Jewish and a Palestinian state, 24% said they supported an equal bational state.”

    A May 2026 poll found that 54% of American Jewish voters preferred a two-state solution and 24% preferred a single binational state with equal political rights.

    The Jewish Voter Resource Center’s May 2026 survey reported 54% favoring two separate states and 24% favoring one state that is neither Jewish nor Palestinian, governed jointly by Israelis and Palestinians. The transcript’s “equal binational state” wording is a reasonable description of the latter option.

    Sources

  52. Claim 52
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 24:13
    “And among American Jews under the age of 35, there were actually more who supported an equal bational state, which is the position I hold, than supported a Jewish state.”

    Among American Jews under 35, more supported an equal binational state than supported a Jewish state.

    The available reporting confirms that roughly half of American Jews under 35—and 51% of non-Orthodox Jews under 35—supported a binational one-state solution. However, the published poll materials do not clearly report a directly comparable under-35 percentage for the undefined category “a Jewish state,” so the specific comparison cannot be confirmed as stated.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  53. Claim 53
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 25:36
    “But the American Jewish experience and the state of Israel and the United States is one of longstanding partnership and alliance.”

    The relationship between the United States and Israel is a longstanding partnership and alliance.

    U.S. government historical and diplomatic materials describe the U.S.-Israel relationship as longstanding, having developed over decades into a strategic alliance and extensive partnership.

    Sources

  54. Claim 54
    Accurate97% confidence▶ 25:55
    “We have had decades of starts and stops in diplomacy to try to get to a two-state solution for many years.”

    There have been decades of diplomatic efforts aimed at achieving a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    The Oslo process began in the 1990s and was followed by further U.S.-mediated negotiations and other diplomatic initiatives seeking Israeli-Palestinian peace and, in many formulations, two states. The claim is broadly and accurately stated.

    Sources

  55. Claim 55
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 26:07
    “We've seen inifadas.”

    The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has included multiple intifadas.

    The First Intifada and Second, or al-Aqsa, Intifada are well-documented periods of Israeli-Palestinian uprising and violence.

    Sources

  56. Claim 56
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 26:11
    “We've seen uh assassinations of an Israeli prime minister who was trying to make peace.”

    An Israeli prime minister who was pursuing peace was assassinated.

    Yitzhak Rabin signed the 1993 Oslo Accord and was assassinated in November 1995 by Yigal Amir, an Israeli opponent of the accords. The description of Rabin as trying to make peace is supported by his diplomatic role.

    Sources

  57. Claim 57
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 27:01
    “there are many many activists who already say that we will not allow Zionists into our for example organizations”

    Many activists say that Zionists will not be allowed into their organizations.

    There are documented instances of anti-Zionist activists excluding or protesting Zionists, but “many many activists” and “our organizations” are undefined, so the breadth of the claim cannot be established from available evidence.

    Sources

  58. Claim 58
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 27:16
    “Jewish organizations that are self-described Jewish who also are pro-Israel then described as Zionist because they're pro-Israel being kicked off of platforms and out of events and meetings from progressive ressive groups”

    Jewish organizations that are Jewish and pro-Israel are being labeled Zionist and excluded from progressive groups' platforms, events, and meetings.

    Reliable reporting documents the exclusion of Jewish participants from at least one progressive event because they expressed support for Zionism, but the transcript makes a broader claim about Jewish organizations, multiple platforms, and progressive groups without identifying them or defining the scope.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  59. Claim 59
    Unverifiable91% confidence▶ 28:37

    Most mainstream Jewish organizations are Zionist organizations.

    “Most,” “mainstream,” and “Jewish organizations” are not operationally defined, and there is no agreed census or standard that establishes which organizations belong in the comparison. Individual major organizations are explicitly pro-Israel or Zionist, but that does not verify the unquantified generalization.

    Sources: none found for this claim.

  60. Claim 60
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 29:12
    “fact that this state has been declared to be practicing apartate by the world's leading human rights organization.”

    A leading human-rights organization has declared that Israel is practicing apartheid.

    Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have both published findings that Israeli authorities' treatment of Palestinians amounts to apartheid. However, the claim's designation of one unnamed body as "the world's leading" human-rights organization has no agreed objective standard, so the full claim cannot be verified as stated.

    The intensifier "world's leading" is undefined; judged as stated, rather than as the narrower claim that a major international human-rights organization made this finding.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  61. Claim 61
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 30:01
    “Last week, they sponsored the Jewish-American Summit in LA where speakers said,”

    The ADL co-sponsored the Jewish American Summit in Los Angeles held the previous week.

    The 2026 summit took place in Los Angeles on August 30, 2026, and contemporaneous reporting identifies the Anti-Defamation League as one of its co-sponsors. Calling the ADL a sponsor is accurate, although Aish LA was the main organizer.

    Sources

  62. Claim 62
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 30:24
    “I as an American I as a taxpayer I don't want Muslims in America. Get the out of the United States. go back to the where you came from and reform your own countries.”

    A speaker at the summit said that he did not want Muslims in America and told them to leave the United States and return to their countries.

    Independent reporting and a contemporaneous CAIR statement attribute substantially the same remarks to Mosab Hassan Yousef at the August 30, 2026 summit. The transcript’s profanity appears to be imperfectly transcribed, but the substantive attribution is supported.

    Sources

  63. Claim 63
    Unverifiable78% confidence▶ 30:48
    “I've asked Jonathan Greenblat at the time of recording. Uh he has refused to comment or condemn those remarks.”

    Jonathan Greenblatt had refused to comment on or condemn the summit speaker’s remarks at the time of recording.

    Public reporting confirms that the ADL’s Los Angeles regional office later condemned the remarks, but the available sources do not establish whether Jonathan Greenblatt personally was asked, refused, or had responded at the exact time this video was recorded.

    Sources

  64. Claim 64
    Unverifiable83% confidence▶ 31:16
    “The ADL back during the campaign, this is why I'm I included in the piece. The ADL called me uh during the campaign to complain about what they saw happening and I pushed back hard on them”

    The ADL contacted the speaker during the Sanders campaign to complain about what was happening, and he pushed back in a debate with them.

    This is a specific first-person account of a private conversation. Public sources confirm the ADL’s involvement in responding to antisemitism surrounding Sanders, but do not independently verify this particular call or exchange.

    Sources: none found for this claim.

  65. Claim 65
    Accurate94% confidence▶ 31:32
    “And then when a Nazi sign was unfurled at one of the Sanders rallies, they condemned it.”

    The ADL condemned a Nazi sign displayed at a Bernie Sanders rally.

    A white supremacist unfurled a Nazi flag at Sanders’s Phoenix rally on March 5, 2020, and contemporaneous reporting described public condemnation by Jewish organizations; reporting also states that the ADL publicly condemned the display.

    Sources

  66. Claim 66
    Accurate96% confidence▶ 31:58
    “And they have chapters all around the country that Jewish communities look to for Jewish safety questions. Not just definitions of anti-semitism, but how to do training for synagogue security, how to take down the shooter who's coming in.”

    The ADL has regional offices across the country that provide Jewish communities with security-related assistance and training, including active-shooter preparedness.

    The ADL lists a nationwide network of regional offices and publishes security resources and training for Jewish institutions, including guidance on active shooters and crisis preparedness. The phrase “take down the shooter” is colloquial; the documented service is preparedness and response training, not necessarily physical intervention.

    Sources

    • 1Regional Offices | ADL

      SupportsWith a network of offices across the country and a global presence, ADL works in local communities, responding to incidents of antisemitism and hate, advocating with elected officials and providing education programs in schools and workplaces.

    • 2In Preparation for High Holidays, ADL Provides Updated Security Manual and Resources to Jewish Institutions Across the Country

      SupportsThe new 2015 edition of ADL’s security manual - Protecting Your Jewish Institution - provides information on important topics including: security planning; physical security and operations; relationships with emergency personnel; guide to detecting surveillance; computer and data security; explosive threat response planning; active shooters; considerations for schools and summer camps; dealing with protesters and crisis management.

  67. Claim 67
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 32:57
    “Abdul Als is facing an insanely Islamophobic campaign against him separate to what you may see as legitimate criticisms of his policy positions.”

    Abdul El-Sayed is facing an Islamophobic campaign separate from legitimate criticism of his policy positions.

    Reliable reporting documented attacks on El-Sayed that targeted his Muslim identity, including references to burqas, mosques, terrorism and sharia law, rather than only his policy positions.

    The intensifier "insanely" is not independently assessed; the verdict concerns the existence of an Islamophobic campaign distinct from policy criticism.

    Sources

  68. Claim 68
    Unverifiable81% confidence▶ 33:17
    “You even put you even suggested that Mandani is against Zionist being in the Democratic party which something he's never said”

    Mamdani has never said that he is against Zionists being in the Democratic Party.

    A complete record of every relevant statement by Mamdani is not available, so the absolute claim that he has "never said" this cannot be confirmed. Available reporting does document him saying that Zionists would not be banned from his administration, but that does not by itself establish what he has or has not said about the Democratic Party.

    The claim is judged as stated, including the absolute term "never" and the undefined reference to being "against Zionists being in the Democratic party."

    Sources

  69. Claim 69
    Accurate94% confidence▶ 35:15
    “when he says things like Jews are feeling aranged and pushed out. I have a bit of a problem because it suggests that there's a kind of a monolith that the polls show that Jews are profoundly divided on the question.”

    Polling shows that American Jews are profoundly divided over Israel.

    Recent AP-NORC polling reports sharp divisions among American Jews by religiosity, age and views of Israel, including disagreements within families and communities. The evidence supports the claim that Jews are not politically or attitudinally monolithic on this issue.

    The intensifier "profoundly" is treated as emphasis; the factual assertion evaluated is that polling shows substantial division among American Jews over Israel.

    Sources

  70. Claim 70
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 35:34
    “a younger generation of Jews we sue it in the polls are not just critical of the state. They have various serious questions about the whole idea of a Jewish state.”

    Younger Jews have become critical of Israel and some have serious questions about the idea of a Jewish state.

    Surveys do show younger American Jews are less emotionally attached to Israel and more critical of its policies. However, the framing suggests broad rejection of the idea of a Jewish state, while survey results indicate that an overwhelming majority across age groups still support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state.

    Omits: The statement omits that available survey reporting finds an overwhelming majority of American Jews across age groups support Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state, even though younger Jews tend to feel less emotionally attached to Israel.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  71. Claim 71
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 35:43
    “We both know that on many of those encampments where the Jewish Jewish students were over represented on the very encampments that”

    Jewish students were overrepresented in many of the pro-Palestinian encampments.

    Available surveys document Jewish participation in some pro-Palestinian activity, but they do not establish the speaker’s broad claim across "many" encampments or define the population against which Jewish students were supposedly overrepresented. At Columbia, a university survey instead found that 70% of Jewish students opposed the encampment protests.

    The claim is judged as stated. "Many," "those encampments," and "overrepresented" do not specify which campuses or the comparison population, making the scope and denominator undefined.

    Sources

  72. Claim 72
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 37:12
    “there are lots and lots of Jews, particularly in the younger generation, who who have views that the Anti-Defamation League now considers anti-semitic. They are anti-Zionist.”

    Many Jews, particularly younger Jews, are anti-Zionist and hold views that the ADL considers antisemitic.

    The ADL identifies some forms of anti-Zionism as antisemitic, but it does not categorically classify every anti-Zionist view or every anti-Zionist person as antisemitic. The wording therefore creates the impression that the ADL labels anti-Zionism generally as antisemitic.

    Omits: The ADL distinguishes between anti-Zionism that uses anti-Jewish rhetoric or denies Jewish self-determination and anti-Zionism that does not; it states that a person can theoretically be anti-Zionist without being antisemitic.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1Understanding Antisemitism and Anti-Zionism

      BackgroundAt the same time, criticism of Israel can be antisemitic if the criticism includes anti-Jewish rhetoric, promotes views aimed at delegitimizing Israel and Jewish nationhood, or uses language or slogans that demonize the Jewish State and its supporters.

    • 2Antisemitism

      RefutesOne can theoretically be an anti-Zionist without being antisemitic.

  73. Claim 73
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 37:43
    “It's the Democrats that have the most senior elected Jewish leader in American history, Chuck Schumer, as the Senate leader.”

    Chuck Schumer was the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in U.S. history while serving as Senate leader.

    The Associated Press described Schumer as the first Jewish Senate majority leader and the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in the United States. This supports the substance of the statement, although “most senior” is less standard wording than “highest-ranking.”

    Sources

  74. Claim 74
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 37:51
    “It's the Democrats who have Jewish governors.”

    The Democratic Party has Jewish governors.

    Multiple Jewish governors serve as Democrats. A current list identifies six Jewish governors and states that all six are Democrats.

    Sources

  75. Claim 75
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 37:52
    “Democrats who have more Jewish members of Congress than Republican party.”

    The Democratic Party has more Jewish members of Congress than the Republican Party.

    Pew counted 29 Jewish Democratic members of the 119th Congress, compared with three Jewish Republican members. Thus Democrats had substantially more Jewish members of Congress.

    Sources

  76. Claim 76
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 38:07
    “40% of American Jews according to the Washington Post poll last year think it's a genocide in Gaza.”

    About 40% of American Jews in a Washington Post poll said Israel's actions in Gaza amounted to genocide.

    The Washington Post reported that about four in ten American Jews in its poll said Israel was guilty of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza; the detailed result was 39%, which reasonably rounds to 40%.

    Sources

  77. Claim 77
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 38:13
    “60% of American Jews think war crimes have been committed in Gaza.”

    About 60% of American Jews in a Washington Post poll said Israel had committed war crimes in Gaza.

    The Washington Post reported that 61% of surveyed American Jews said Israel had committed war crimes against Palestinians in Gaza, which is appropriately described as about 60%.

    Sources

  78. Claim 78
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 39:02
    “American Jews who are long-standing in good standing members of the Democratic Party with the the level of participation you described are feeling belleaguered and pushed out because they care about the state of Israel”

    Some long-standing Jewish Democratic participants who care about Israel feel beleaguered and pushed out.

    Available polling supports that many Jewish adults feel isolated and that support for Israel has become politically divisive, but the transcript's specific subgroup, the causal link to caring about Israel, and the phrase “pushed out” are not defined well enough to verify as stated.

    Sources

  79. Claim 79
    Unverifiable90% confidence▶ 40:09
    “Muslims living in the West have been told again and again that there are certain things they must sign up to if they want to be part of liberal democracy”

    Muslims living in the West have repeatedly been told they must accept certain things to participate in liberal democracy.

    The claim is too broad to verify because “certain things,” who supposedly imposed them, and what counts as being part of liberal democracy are undefined. Evidence documents post-9/11 discrimination and public debates about Muslim integration, but not this precise universal or cross-Western assertion.

    Sources

  80. Claim 80
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 40:17
    “You can't go around as a as a Muslim American politician right now and say I support Saudi Arabia's uh laws and repression, you can't.”

    A Muslim American politician cannot publicly say that they support Saudi Arabia's laws and repression.

    “Can't go around” could mean legally prohibited, politically unacceptable, or merely difficult, and no operational standard is given. Saudi Arabia's repressive practices are well documented, but that does not establish the speaker's absolute claim about what every Muslim American politician can publicly say.

    Sources

    • 1Saudi Arabia - United States Department of State

      SupportsSignificant human rights issues included credible reports of: arbitrary or unlawful killings, including extrajudicial killings; enforced disappearance; torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment by government agents; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrest and detention; serious problems with the independence of the judiciary; political prisoners or detainees; transnational repression against individuals in another country; arbitrary or unlawful interference with privacy; punishment of family members for alleged offenses by a relative; serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, including violence or threats of violence against journalists, unjustified arrests or prosecutions of journalists, and censorship; serious restrictions on internet freedom; substantial interference with the freedom of peaceful assembly and freedom of association, including overly restrictive laws on the organization, funding, or operation of nongovernmental and civil society organizations; restrictions of religious freedom; restrictions on freedom of movement and residence within the territory of a state and on the right to leave the country; refoulement of refugees to a country where they would face torture or persecution; inability of citizens to change their government peacefully through free and fair elections; serious and unreasonable restrictions on political participation; serious government restrictions on domestic and international human rights organizations; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting migrants and refugees, especially of Ethiopian origin; laws criminalizing consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults which were not enforced; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex persons; and prohibiting independent trade unions or significant restrictions on workers’ freedom of association.

    • 2To be Muslim in America

      BackgroundThe things that they imply because of their ignorance, most of the Muslim countries’ laws are based on the laws of the colonists that left, British French, Dutch, they left those laws in those countries combined with the local tradition, local laws, Islamic laws, hodge-podge of those laws.

  81. Claim 81
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 41:42

    Israel is an American ally.

    The United States officially designates Israel as a Major Non-NATO Ally under U.S. law, directly supporting the claim.

    Sources

  82. Claim 82
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 43:12
    “whose own leading human rights organiz has said it's based on the principle of Jewish supremacy”

    B’Tselem, an Israeli human-rights organization, has characterized the system Israel controls as advancing Jewish supremacy.

    B’Tselem published a report describing the system across the area Israel controls as one that promotes Jewish supremacy over Palestinians. The transcript’s wording is a fair attribution, although “leading” is evaluative.

    Sources

  83. Claim 83
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 43:20
    “that has is practicing a partate according to the the most credible human rights organizations in the world”

    Israel is practicing apartheid according to the most credible human-rights organizations in the world.

    Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have concluded that Israeli authorities’ treatment of Palestinians amounts to apartheid, so the underlying attribution to major rights organizations is supported. However, “the most credible human rights organizations in the world” has no agreed definition or ranking, making the claim as stated uncheckable.

    Sources

  84. Claim 84
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 43:24
    “and now has committed genocide according to the International Association of Genocide Scholars.”

    The International Association of Genocide Scholars says that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza.

    In its Gaza resolution, passed on August 31, 2025, the International Association of Genocide Scholars declared that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide. This verifies the attribution, though the resolution is an institutional determination rather than a final judicial ruling.

    Sources

    • 1IAGS Resolution on the Situation in Gaza

      SupportsDeclares that Israel’s policies and actions in Gaza meet the legal definition of genocide in Article II of the United Nations Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948);

  85. Claim 85
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 44:34
    “You also said on news nation in July, there's no academic argument that can convince me that being hostile to Israel is not anti-semitic.”

    Joel Rubin said in a July NewsNation appearance that no academic argument could convince him that hostility to Israel is not antisemitic.

    Rubin confirms that he appeared on NewsNation in an interview about antisemitism, and he has publicly argued that some anti-Israel positions are antisemitic. I could not locate a reliable source reproducing or independently confirming this exact quoted sentence, so the precise attribution remains unverified.

    Sources

    • 1My Antisemitism Advice for Democrats

      BackgroundEarlier this week I did an interview on NewsNation with Batya Ungar-Sargon about the Democratic party’s internal challenges with antisemitism (the video is included in this post).

  86. Claim 86
    Accurate93% confidence▶ 46:25
    “whose family was expelled in 1948”

    A Palestinian family was expelled in 1948.

    UN sources document the mass displacement of Palestinians during the 1948 war, including forced flight and expulsions. The claim refers to a family, not to all Palestinian families, and is consistent with that documented history.

    Sources

    • 1About the Nakba

      SupportsThe Nakba, which means “catastrophe” in Arabic, refers to the mass displacement and dispossession of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.

    • 2State of the World's Refugees 2006 – Palestinian refugees

      SupportsThe conflict, which lasted from November 1947 to July 1949, led to the expulsion or flight of some 750,000-900,000 people from Palestine, the vast majority of them Arabs.

  87. Claim 87
    Accurate96% confidence▶ 46:29
    “whose family has been living under under military law or under blockade”

    Palestinian families have lived under military law or under the Gaza blockade.

    Human Rights Watch reports that Israeli authorities govern West Bank Palestinians under military law, while UN humanitarian reporting documents the blockade imposed on Gaza. Because the statement uses “or,” either circumstance is sufficient.

    Sources

  88. Claim 88
    Unverifiable78% confidence▶ 46:32
    “who's seen dozens of their families been killed”

    A Palestinian family has seen dozens of its family members killed.

    UN reporting documents individual cases in which more than 20 members of one extended family were killed, so the underlying type of event is documented. However, the speaker identifies no particular family or person, and the phrase “seen dozens of their families” is grammatically ambiguous, so the personal-experience claim cannot be verified as stated.

    Sources