claimpit
← All receipts
Fact-Checker/Videos
Video fact-check

"You Crossed EVERY Moral Line!" Piers Morgan Vs Hamas + US-Iran War & Spain-Morocco Migration

189 claims checked · August 2026

Watch on YouTube Jump to claims ↓
The receipts

Every claim, checked

  1. Claim 1
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 0:50
    “President Trump says the US has delayed the biggest military attack since it nuked Japan after a direct request from a Saudi crown prince and from Iran itself.”

    Trump said the United States delayed a planned attack on Iran after requests from Saudi Arabia and Iran, describing it as the biggest attack since World War II.

    Trump did say he had postponed a planned attack after appeals from regional leaders and unnamed Iranian officials, and described it as the biggest attack since World War II. The transcript's wording is misleading because it changes the comparison and presents Iran's involvement as established despite Iranian denials.

    Omits: The report substitutes "since it nuked Japan" for Trump's stated comparison, "since World War II," and does not mention that Trump also cited Qatar and the United Arab Emirates; Iranian officials disputed that Iran had asked him to hold off.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  2. Claim 2
    Accurate88% confidence▶ 0:58
    “Once again, Trump says that they are close to securing a deal.”

    Trump said that the United States and Iran were close to securing a deal.

    Contemporaneous reporting states that Trump said negotiations with Iran were resuming and that the two sides were pursuing an agreement. This verifies that he made the claim, not that a final deal had actually been reached.

    Sources

  3. Claim 3
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:08
    “US and Israeli officials are being forced to deny extraordinary claims that they helped to plan a rush of 60,000 migrants into one of Spain's Moroccan exclaves.”

    About 60,000 migrants entered Ceuta from Morocco over a short period.

    Spanish officials did report that roughly 60,000 migrants entered Ceuta from Morocco. However, AP described the related claims that Trump and Israel encouraged or coordinated the crossing as conspiracy theories and unsubstantiated, so the framing is misleading.

    Omits: The 60,000 figure concerns migrants who entered Ceuta, but the available fact-checking describes the claims that Trump and Israel helped plan the crossing as unsubstantiated; the transcript presents the conspiracy allegation without clearly distinguishing it from the verified migration figure.

    Sources

  4. Claim 4
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:22
    “Trump's controversial border peace says it's reached a landmark deal for Hamas to disarm and for Israel to leave Gaza.”

    Trump announced a landmark Gaza deal under which Hamas would disarm and Israel would leave Gaza.

    Trump did announce a deal calling for Hamas's complete disarmament and an Israeli withdrawal. Calling it an achieved landmark deal overstates the status because reporting described unresolved implementation questions and uncertainty about the parties' formal acceptance.

    Omits: The announcement concerned an agreement or plan whose implementation and acceptance remained uncertain; reporting said the details were limited and that Israeli and Hamas officials had not publicly acknowledged the arrangement in the same terms.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  5. Claim 5
    Accurate84% confidence▶ 1:29
    “There's been no official word from Israel, which carried out intensive strikes in Gaza this weekend.”

    Israel had not officially commented on the announced Gaza deal at that time.

    Contemporaneous reporting said Israel had not publicly issued a statement acknowledging the announcement, while Israeli forces were continuing military operations in Gaza. The claim is limited to the absence of an official Israeli statement at that time.

    Sources

  6. Claim 6
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 2:06
    “People are killed every day. People are exterminated every day in Gaza.”

    People in Gaza were being killed every day.

    The speaker's first sentence is supported by repeated reporting of continuing deaths in Gaza during the war. The wording "exterminated" is a characterization, but the underlying assertion that people were being killed daily is factual.

    The checker returned Accurate but could not show evidence for that verdict, so this is recorded as unverifiable.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  7. Claim 7
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 2:20
    “from mass killing from massacres from genocide”

    The Gaza war involved genocide.

    The existence of mass civilian killing and grave violations in Gaza is extensively documented, but whether those facts legally satisfy the definition of genocide is disputed by credible institutions. The claim therefore falls under the specified contested category.

    The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.

    Sources

  8. Claim 8
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 3:08
    “settlements in the West Bank confiscation of lands”

    Israeli settlements and land confiscation have affected Palestinians in the West Bank.

    UN and other international bodies document Israeli settlement expansion and associated confiscation or seizure of Palestinian land in the occupied West Bank.

    Sources

  9. Claim 9
    Unverifiable91% confidence▶ 3:43
    “They killed more than 30 people citizen children and women”

    Israeli forces killed more than 30 civilians, including children and women, after Hamas accepted an agreement.

    The transcript does not identify the date, agreement, incident, or source for this “yesterday” claim. Without the recording date and a specific event, the reported number and causal connection cannot be reliably checked.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  10. Claim 10
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 4:27
    “Israel is a state of occupation, state of uh uh extermination, a state of genocide, a state of racism, apartide.”

    Israel is a state of occupation, extermination, genocide, racism and apartheid.

    The occupation characterization is supported by the ICRC and UN institutions, while the genocide and apartheid labels are the subject of formal, unresolved disputes. The ICJ's provisional-measures decisions were not final merits findings on genocide.

    The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.

    Sources

  11. Claim 11
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 4:44
    “you went on camera uh publicly and said we will do this again and again and again and said you were wedded to annihilating Israel.”

    A Hamas official publicly said the October 7 attack would be repeated and Israel should be annihilated.

    Hamas Political Bureau member Ghazi Hamad said in an October 2023 television interview that the attack would be repeated and that Israel should be removed or destroyed. The transcript's attribution is therefore substantially accurate, although it does not name Hamad.

    Sources

  12. Claim 12
    Unverifiable88% confidence▶ 4:57
    “after October the 7th, one of the worst terrorist attacks of modern times”

    The October 7 attack was one of the worst terrorist attacks of modern times.

    The October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack killed around 1,200 people and involved 251 hostages, but “one of the worst terrorist attacks of modern times” is an undefined comparative ranking rather than a precisely testable standard.

    The intensifier “one of the worst” is judged as stated; “worst” lacks an agreed comparison set and threshold, so the ranking cannot be objectively confirmed.

    Sources

  13. Claim 13
    False50% confidence▶ 5:17
    “What do you expect for from Palestinian people under occupation for 80 years?”

    Palestinians have been under occupation for 80 years.

    The 80-year figure may describe the period since the 1948 war or the broader Palestinian displacement and conflict, but it is false as stated because Israeli occupation of the territories generally identified as occupied began in 1967.

    Sources

  14. Claim 14
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 5:41
    “the Palestinian people, Palestinian organization, PLO, they try to find a solution peace process with Israel”

    The PLO tried to pursue a peace process with Israel.

    The PLO entered the Oslo peace process, recognized Israel and negotiated interim self-government arrangements with Israel beginning in 1993.

    Sources

  15. Claim 15
    Unverifiable75% confidence▶ 6:14
    “you yourself said publicly that you wanted Hamas to keep doing an October the 7th style attack again and again and again”

    The interviewee had publicly said he wanted Hamas to carry out October 7-style attacks repeatedly.

    The transcript provides no source, date, or exact quotation for the alleged public statement, and the available evidence reviewed here does not establish whether he made this statement or what its full context was.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  16. Claim 16
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 7:06
    “You had 3,000 members of your organization, Hamas, pour over the Israeli border”

    About 3,000 Hamas members crossed the Israeli border during the October 7 attack.

    The figure of 3,000 appears in reporting about Hamas’s planned force, while the UN’s investigation describes more than 1,000 armed-group members actually launching the attack, alongside civilians and multiple armed groups. Presenting 3,000 as confirmed Hamas members who crossed the border overstates what the cited evidence establishes.

    Omits: The UN Commission of Inquiry describes an attack by more than 1,000 Hamas and other Palestinian armed-group members, accompanied by Palestinian civilians; separate reporting referred to a planned deployment of about 3,000 Hamas fighters, not necessarily 3,000 people who crossed the border.

    Sources

  17. Claim 17
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 7:11
    “commit a series of despicable crimes in which you massacred innocent civilians uh all over uh Israel”

    Hamas and allied Palestinian armed groups massacred civilians in attacks across southern Israel on October 7, 2023.

    The UN Commission found that Hamas, other Palestinian armed groups, and Palestinian civilians attacked civilian targets in at least 24 localities and public spaces in southern Israel. The underlying claim of widespread civilian killings is supported, but “all over Israel” gives a geographically broader impression than the evidence supports.

    Omits: The attacks were concentrated in southern Israel and near the Gaza border, rather than occurring throughout Israel as the phrase “all over Israel” suggests.

    The intensifier “all over Israel” was judged; the narrower claim that civilians were massacred in multiple locations in southern Israel is supported.

    Sources

  18. Claim 18
    Accurate96% confidence▶ 7:20
    “You then captured over 250 of them, including Holocaust survivors and a baby”

    More than 250 people, including Holocaust survivors and a baby, were taken hostage by Hamas and its allies on October 7, 2023.

    UN reporting records 251 people abducted to Gaza on October 7, including older people, and Israeli official reporting identifies Holocaust survivors and infants among the victims and hostages. The speaker’s “over 250” is consistent with the documented total.

    Sources

  19. Claim 19
    Accurate96% confidence▶ 7:49
    “Hamas deliberately massacred people at a music festival. Hundreds of young people enjoyed a music festival. That is a war crime.”

    Hamas deliberately massacred hundreds of civilians at the Nova music festival, and this constituted a war crime.

    The UN Commission found that 364 attendees at the Nova festival were killed by Hamas’s military wing and other Palestinian armed groups and concluded that members of those groups committed war crimes during the October 7 attack. The wording “hundreds” is supported.

    Sources

  20. Claim 20
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 8:11
    “You burned people alive in their homes.”

    Hamas and allied attackers burned civilians or homes during the October 7 attack.

    The UN Commission documented attackers setting homes on fire and reported burning and other mutilation of corpses. UN reporting also verified that an Israeli child was killed by burning during the October 7 attacks.

    Sources

  21. Claim 21
    Unverifiable86% confidence▶ 8:16
    “how hundred thousands of Palestinians since 1948 civilians women and children were killed by days of forces”

    Hundreds of thousands of Palestinian civilians, women, and children have been killed by Israeli forces since 1948.

    No authoritative, comprehensive casualty series was found that establishes the exact broad claim as stated, including the period since 1948, civilians and combatants, women and children, and deaths specifically attributable to Israeli forces. Available sources document very large Palestinian losses in particular wars and periods, but do not substantiate this aggregate figure with the stated scope.

    Sources

  22. Claim 22
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 9:00
    “nobody in Hamas committed any crimes on October the 7th is just a brazen lie.”

    No Hamas members committed crimes on October 7.

    A UN commission found reasonable grounds that Hamas’s military wing and other Palestinian armed groups committed multiple war crimes on October 7, including intentional killings, torture, cruel treatment, and hostage-taking.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  23. Claim 23
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 9:06
    “your terrorists poured over the border and slaughtered hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of innocent civilians and capt and captured and captured many more.”

    Hamas and allied attackers killed hundreds of civilians and captured many more people on October 7.

    The October 7 attack killed more than a thousand people in Israel, including hundreds of civilians, and Palestinian armed groups took more than 200 hostages. The wording does not specify that all perpetrators were Hamas alone, but its substantive numerical assertion is supported.

    Sources

  24. Claim 24
    Misleading90% confidence▶ 9:50
    “I think we did him very very kind with them. We feed them. We give him all kinds of of of protection and shelter.”

    Hamas generally treated Israeli hostages kindly by feeding and sheltering them.

    Some released hostages reported receiving food or medical care, but the UN Commission of Inquiry found that Hamas and allied groups committed torture and cruel or inhuman treatment against hostages. Presenting the treatment as broadly kind and protective creates a misleading impression.

    Omits: The statement omits documented findings that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups subjected hostages to torture, cruel or inhuman treatment, and sexual violence; it also generalizes from an asserted level of care to all hostages.

    Sources

  25. Claim 25
    Misleading86% confidence▶ 10:04
    “our prisoners now more than seven or 9 thousands now every day they are exposed to the tortures and exposed to the humiliation”

    More than 7,000 or 9,000 Palestinian prisoners were being exposed daily to torture and humiliation.

    Contemporary reporting placed the number of Palestinian prisoners and detainees in the several-thousand to roughly 9,000 range, and UN reporting documented torture and mistreatment. However, the evidence does not support the universal daily claim about all prisoners.

    Omits: The statement treats the entire prisoner population as being tortured every day, whereas the available evidence documents serious abuse and torture of detainees but does not establish that every one of more than 7,000 or 9,000 prisoners experienced torture daily.

    Sources

  26. Claim 26
    Unverifiable96% confidence▶ 10:27
    “about 1,400 people were killed you can see 80% of the are civilians women and children”

    About 1,400 people were killed after the referenced agreement, and 80% were civilians, women, and children.

    The agreement is transcribed as “Shashik,” which is not sufficiently identifiable, and the statement does not define the time period, location, or source for the 1,400 deaths and 80% figure. Without those terms, the claim cannot be reliably tested as stated.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  27. Claim 27
    Unverifiable92% confidence▶ 10:40
    “more than 80 according to aesthetics and the subject of the international organization more than 90% of people are civilians.”

    More than 80% or 90% of people killed in the war were civilians.

    The transcript is unclear about whether the percentages refer to people killed, Gaza’s population, or another denominator, and it does not identify the cited statistics or international organization. The undefined denominator and conflicting 80%/90% figures prevent verification.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  28. Claim 28
    Unverifiable84% confidence▶ 11:43
    “the fact that 75 80% of Gaza is pretty well uninhabitable is a disgrace.”

    Seventy-five to eighty percent of Gaza was uninhabitable.

    UN and humanitarian sources described Gaza as becoming uninhabitable and documented extensive destruction, including nearly 80% damage in some areas. But “75–80% of Gaza” and “uninhabitable” lack a clearly defined measurement in the cited statement, so the precise claim cannot be confirmed.

    The intensifier “pretty well” was judged as part of the claim; sources describe Gaza as uninhabitable or document extensive destruction, but do not establish that exactly 75–80% of Gaza met that undefined condition.

    Sources

  29. Claim 29
    False99% confidence▶ 12:34
    “We never as Hamas we never use our power and our capability against Europeans against Christians against Jews against Western people.”

    Hamas did not use its power against Europeans, Christians, Jews, or Western people.

    The claim uses an absolute 'never.' UN and U.S. government reporting document Hamas-led attacks against Israeli and foreign civilians, including nationals from multiple countries, so the assertion is false.

    Sources

  30. Claim 30
    Misleading98% confidence▶ 12:47
    “We are fighting against occupation and it is our right according to United Nation resolution according to the international community according to all kinds of regulations and laws. It is our fight against to to to end this this h this monastery this occupation. We want to end it. No one help us to do that. So I think we have to use everything”

    International law and UN resolutions give Hamas a right to use everything in its fight against occupation.

    International law may address peoples' political status and occupation, but it does not grant an unlimited right to use 'everything.' The ICRC states that the laws of war apply to all parties and prohibit attacks on civilians, indiscriminate attacks, and hostage-taking.

    Omits: The statement omits that international humanitarian law prohibits attacks directed against civilians, indiscriminate attacks, terrorizing civilians, and hostage-taking, regardless of the asserted cause or existence of occupation.

    Sources

  31. Claim 31
    False100% confidence▶ 13:07
    “we never cross the lines of morality and humanity and laws in our conflict against”

    Hamas never crossed moral, humanitarian, or legal lines in its conflict.

    The universal claim is contradicted by documented findings from the UN Commission of Inquiry. The Commission identified multiple Hamas-led acts as war crimes and violations of international humanitarian law.

    Sources

  32. Claim 32
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 13:27
    “On October the 7th, the actions the actions of Hamas on October the 7th crossed every single moral, ethical and humanity line. Your people committed acts of utter barbarism against innocent Israelis.”

    Hamas-led attackers committed acts of barbarism against innocent Israelis on October 7, 2023.

    Although 'barbarism' is rhetorical language, the underlying factual assertion that Hamas-led attackers committed grave abuses against Israeli civilians is supported by the UN Commission, which found intentional attacks on civilians, murder, torture, and hostage-taking.

    Sources

  33. Claim 33
    Accurate90% confidence▶ 13:44
    “your Hamas terrorists, your people, they deliberately posted videos of their of themselves committing their atrocities in real time.”

    Hamas terrorists deliberately posted videos of themselves committing atrocities in real time on October 7, 2023.

    Contemporaneous reporting and digital investigations documented Hamas-linked channels broadcasting or posting attacker-recorded footage during the October 7 assault. The available evidence supports the core claim, though not every video circulating that day can be attributed to Hamas itself.

    Sources

  34. Claim 34
    False98% confidence▶ 15:02
    “We have no instruction to do that. We never planned to take civilian.”

    The speaker said Hamas had no instruction to kidnap civilians and never planned to take civilians.

    The UN Commission concluded that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups deliberately killed, injured, mistreated and took civilians hostage. That finding contradicts the categorical assertion that there was no instruction or plan involving civilians.

    Sources

  35. Claim 35
    Unverifiable83% confidence▶ 15:17
    “We are ready to free all civilians all civilians in the beginning of war but Israel refused that”

    Hamas proposed releasing all civilian hostages at the beginning of the war, but Israel refused.

    There were public Hamas claims about releasing some hostages and later statements expressing willingness to release civilian hostages under conditions, but the specific assertion that Hamas offered all civilians at the beginning of the war and that Israel refused that exact offer is not established by the cited evidence.

    Sources

  36. Claim 36
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 15:30
    “Our goal in this war or in seven October is to uh what's called to to lift the siege on Gaza to take soldiers hostage. That's right. In order to free about 6,000 Palestinians”

    The stated goal of the October 7 attack was to lift the siege and take soldiers hostage in order to free about 6,000 Palestinian prisoners.

    Hamas publicly framed hostage-taking as a means of securing Palestinian-prisoner releases, but this statement makes a specific claim about the operational goal of October 7 and an approximate figure of 6,000 prisoners. The available investigations establish that both soldiers and civilians were abducted, but do not conclusively verify that the operation's goal was limited to soldiers or that the number was specifically about 6,000.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  37. Claim 37
    False99% confidence▶ 15:53
    “along the the history of Hamas, we never used terrorist against anyone.”

    Hamas has never used terrorism against anyone.

    Regardless of disputes over the legal label 'terrorism,' Hamas's record includes deliberate attacks on civilians and hostage-taking. The October 7 attack alone falsifies the absolute claim that Hamas has never used terrorism against anyone.

    Sources

  38. Claim 38
    False100% confidence▶ 16:05
    “There is no one evidence that Hamas is using or committing crimes against civilians.”

    There is no evidence that Hamas committed crimes against civilians.

    This categorical claim is directly contradicted by extensive investigations. The UN Commission found reasonable grounds for multiple war-crime findings involving attacks on civilians and hostage-taking.

    Sources

  39. Claim 39
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 16:16
    “Hamas terrorists go to a music festival full of young people and massacre hundreds of those young people at a music festival.”

    Hundreds of young people were massacred by Hamas at the Nova music festival.

    The UN Commission found that 364 attendees at the Nova music festival were killed by members of Hamas's military wing and other Palestinian armed groups, which supports the claim that hundreds of young festivalgoers were massacred.

    Sources

  40. Claim 40
    Misleading90% confidence▶ 16:44
    “Many people killed by the Israeli forces. Many Israeli citizen killed by the Israeli forces. Many of them with Hamas fighters entered inside the green line. the Israeli tanks and helicopters and all military weapons they they directed their fire to the Israeli citizen”

    Many Israeli citizens were killed by Israeli forces during the October 7 attack, including by tanks and helicopters firing on civilians.

    Some Israeli fire may have caused Israeli casualties during chaotic fighting, and investigations have examined possible friendly-fire incidents. However, the broad claim that many Israeli citizens were killed by Israeli forces, including through tank and helicopter fire, is not established as stated and omits the documented primary responsibility of Hamas-led fighters for deliberate civilian killings.

    Omits: The claim omits that the UN Commission found Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups deliberately killed civilians, while stating it could not confirm that Israeli attack helicopters fired on civilians or civilian cars at the Nova festival; evidence of some Israeli friendly-fire incidents does not establish that Israeli forces killed 'many' civilians overall.

    Sources

  41. Claim 41
    False99% confidence▶ 17:13
    “Hamas is not d was not directing its action against the civilians. Our goal is very clear. I don't deny that there some mistakes happened at that time. But this is not our policy.”

    Hamas did not direct its actions against civilians and any civilian harm on October 7 was merely the result of mistakes rather than policy.

    The claim denies deliberate civilian targeting and characterizes civilian harm as mistakes, but the UN investigation found intentional attacks against civilians and multiple related war crimes. That evidence directly contradicts the claim as stated.

    Sources

  42. Claim 42
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 17:47
    “This was a coordinated plan of a terrorist attack.”

    The October 7 attack was a coordinated plan in which Hamas fighters went from home to home killing families and setting fire to or shooting civilians.

    The UN Commission described October 7 as a coordinated attack and found that Hamas's military wing and other Palestinian armed groups deliberately killed civilians in homes and communities. The quoted sentence is therefore supported, although it does not by itself verify every detail in the preceding description.

    Sources

  43. Claim 43
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 17:59
    “because the Hamas terrorists posted what they were doing onto social media platforms in real time because they were so proud of what they were doing.”

    Hamas posted footage or claims about its October 7 actions on social-media platforms in real time.

    Independent investigations verified that footage of the October 7 attacks was posted or shared online, but the claim attributes a specific motive—pride—to Hamas as a whole. That motive is not objectively established by the cited evidence, and “in real time” is not precisely defined here.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  44. Claim 44
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 18:25
    “The Commission concludes on reasonable grounds that members of the military wings of Hamas and of other Palestinian armed groups, as well as Palestinian civilians who were directly participating in the hostilities, deliberately killed, injured, mistreated, took hostages and committed SGBV against: civilians, including Israeli citizens and foreign nationals”

    The Hamas-led October 7 attack deliberately killed civilians.

    The transcript contains a denial or minimization of deliberate killings, but the independently checkable factual issue is whether Hamas-led forces deliberately killed civilians. The UN Commission of Inquiry concluded on reasonable grounds that they did, and Human Rights Watch separately documented deliberate killings and attacks targeting civilians.

    Sources

  45. Claim 45
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 18:37
    “I I'm so confident that we as Hamas that we we we did October 7 as I told you in order to lift the siege on Gaza”

    Hamas's October 7 attack was carried out in order to lift the siege on Gaza.

    This is a claim about Hamas's internal purpose or motivation. The transcript provides the interviewee's assertion, but the stated evidence does not establish that lifting the siege was the organization's actual operative motive for the attack.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  46. Claim 46
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 18:45
    “the siege imposed in on Gaza for more than 15 years.”

    The blockade or siege imposed on Gaza had lasted more than 15 years by October 7, 2023.

    The United Nations reported that Israel's blockade of Gaza had been imposed since 2007 and described Gaza as having experienced 16 years of blockade in October 2023. Thus, "more than 15 years" was accurate at the time of the October 7 attack.

    Sources

  47. Claim 47
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 20:03
    “killing Palestinian taking their lands building more settlements expanding settlements.”

    Israel has killed Palestinians, taken Palestinian land, and expanded Israeli settlements.

    UN and OHCHR reporting documents Israeli settlement construction and expansion, land-related restrictions and confiscations, and Palestinian deaths caused by Israeli forces and settlers. However, the bundled wording and attribution to a single effort to “destroy the Palestinian identity” go beyond what those sources establish and omit substantial context about time, place, and causation.

    Omits: The statement presents these actions as an undifferentiated, continuous policy without specifying the period, location, or legal and factual distinctions between killings, land confiscation, settlement construction, and settlement expansion.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  48. Claim 48
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 20:09
    “they destroy the peace process. They destroy everything and the world is watching.”

    Israeli settlement activity has undermined or obstructed the peace process.

    “The peace process” is not defined in the statement, and responsibility for its failure is disputed among governments, historians, and analysts. UN reporting supports the narrower claim that settlement expansion and other unilateral actions undermine prospects for negotiations, but it does not establish that Israel alone “destroyed” the peace process.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  49. Claim 49
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 20:54
    “Palestinian are killed every day and”

    Palestinians are killed every day.

    UN OCHA reported that Palestinians continued to be killed in Gaza during the period covered by its April and June 2026 situation reports, including 18 killed in one week and 39 in another. The statement is general rather than a precise numerical claim, but it is supported by the documented ongoing fatalities.

    Sources

    • 1Humanitarian Situation Report | 23 April 2026

      SupportsData by the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Gaza indicates that between 15 and 21 April, 18 Palestinians were killed, three died of wounds, one body was retrieved, and 79 people were injured.

    • 2Humanitarian Situation Report | 12 June 2026

      SupportsAccording to the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Gaza, which operates under the de facto authorities, 39 Palestinians were killed, two bodies were retrieved, four died of wounds, and 199 people were injured between 3 and 10 June.

  50. Claim 50
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 20:56
    “their lands they are are taken by by these crazy gangs”

    Palestinian lands have been taken by Israeli actors.

    UN reporting documents Israeli settlement activity, land confiscation orders, demolitions, and seizures of Palestinian-owned structures. However, the wording’s attribution to “gangs” is imprecise and omits the significant role of Israeli government and military authorities.

    Omits: The statement attributes the land seizures specifically to unspecified “crazy gangs,” while documented cases involve Israeli state authorities, settlement activity, military orders, and sometimes settlers; it also does not distinguish disputed land claims from unlawful confiscation.

    Sources

  51. Claim 51
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 21:04
    “They destroyed the Palestinian authority.”

    The Palestinian Authority was destroyed.

    The claim does not identify who “they” refers to, what “destroyed” means, or which period and institutions are meant. Sources document severe Israeli military attacks on and weakening of Palestinian governing institutions, but not the complete destruction of the Palestinian Authority as an institution.

    Sources

  52. Claim 52
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 22:27
    “because nearly 80,000 people at least, probably many more have been slaughtered by the IDF in response.”

    Nearly 80,000 people have been killed by the IDF in response to October 7.

    By mid-to-late 2025, reported Palestinian deaths in Gaza were approaching or exceeding 80,000, so the magnitude was plausible in context. But the attribution of the entire number to the IDF is not established by the cited casualty reporting, making the framing misleading.

    Omits: The statement presents the Gaza Health Ministry’s overall reported death toll as a verified count of people killed by the IDF, without clarifying that the total includes civilians and combatants, relies on Gaza authorities’ reporting, and does not establish that every death was directly caused by the IDF or occurred solely in response to October 7.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  53. Claim 53
    Misleading95% confidence▶ 22:34
    “75 80% of Gaza has been flattened.”

    Seventy-five to eighty percent of Gaza has been flattened.

    UN and other assessments reported that roughly 68–78 percent of Gaza’s structures had been damaged or destroyed during relevant periods, and later estimates reached about 84 percent of overall destruction. Those figures concern buildings or structures, not 75–80 percent of the territory itself being flattened.

    Omits: The statement conflates the percentage of buildings or structures damaged or destroyed with the percentage of Gaza’s land area that has been physically flattened.

    Sources

  54. Claim 54
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 22:41
    “You the people that have been left uh in a tiny area of Gaza are living in the most appalling conditions.”

    People remaining in Gaza are living in extremely bad conditions and have been concentrated in a very small area.

    UN humanitarian reporting describes most people in Gaza as displaced and living amid dire conditions, severe public-health risks, inadequate shelter, and restricted access to essential services. “Tiny area” and “most appalling” are broad descriptors, but the underlying factual assertion is supported.

    Sources

  55. Claim 55
    Accurate90% confidence▶ 22:46
    “you've now got Israeli ministers openly talking about an ethnic cleansing of both Gaza and the West Bank.”

    Israeli ministers have openly discussed ethnic cleansing of Gaza and the West Bank.

    Public statements and reported plans by senior Israeli officials have called for or supported the forcible displacement of Gaza’s population, while UN reporting has also documented settlement expansion, displacement, and annexation-related measures in the West Bank. Whether those actions legally constitute “ethnic cleansing” is a separate legal characterization, but ministers openly discussing mass displacement is supported.

    Sources

  56. Claim 56
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 23:26
    “Since 1948, we paid more than 100 thousands of people murdered by Israelis”

    More than 100,000 Palestinians have been murdered by Israelis since 1948.

    There is no universally accepted, independently documented cumulative tally matching this exact claim, and the statement does not define whether it includes Palestinians killed by Israeli state forces, settlers, allied forces, or deaths in all locations and conflicts. Palestinian official estimates have reported totals above 100,000, but the methodology and category do not establish the narrower wording “murdered by Israelis.”

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  57. Claim 57
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 23:38
    “the Palestinian tragedy continued for more than 80 years.”

    The Palestinian tragedy has continued for more than 80 years.

    The speaker is referring to the modern Palestinian displacement and conflict beginning around the 1948 war. As of the transcript’s apparent period, that history spans more than 80 years; the statement is a broad historical characterization rather than a precisely bounded event claim.

    Sources

  58. Claim 58
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 23:57
    “the essence of Israel that is a state of genocide a state of mass killing state of ethnic cleansing”

    Israel is a state characterized by genocide, mass killing, and ethnic cleansing.

    A UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israeli authorities and security forces committed genocide in Gaza and identified genocidal acts, while Israel formally rejected that conclusion. The broader labels “state of mass killing” and “state of ethnic cleansing” are not a single settled legal determination applying to Israel as a whole, so the composite assertion is contested rather than established as an undisputed fact.

    The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.

    Sources

  59. Claim 59
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 24:06
    “and a prime minister of Israel now is that is wanted by ICC”

    Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s prime minister, was wanted by the International Criminal Court.

    On 21 November 2024, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu, who was Israel’s prime minister at the relevant time. The warrant alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity; it was not a conviction.

    Sources

  60. Claim 60
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 24:14
    “Now Israel is completely isolated. No, all the world they hate Israel.”

    Israel is completely isolated and hated by the entire world.

    International votes show substantial diplomatic opposition to Israeli policies—for example, a 2024 UN General Assembly resolution passed 124–14 with 43 abstentions—but Israel retains diplomatic relations and support from some states. The terms “completely isolated” and “all the world they hate Israel” are not sufficiently defined for a definitive factual verdict.

    The intensifiers “completely” and “all the world” are judged as stated. “Hate” and “isolated” lack agreed operational definitions, so the universal claim cannot be objectively confirmed or refuted.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  61. Claim 61
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 24:19
    “They are now to end the occupation.”

    The world is now seeking to end Israel’s occupation.

    Major international bodies have adopted measures calling for an end to Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The ICJ said Israel’s continued presence there is unlawful, and the UN General Assembly subsequently demanded that Israel end it.

    Sources

  62. Claim 62
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 27:44
    “I think that the world should understand the essence of Israel and they should understand this a state of occupation, genocide aparttheide state of settlements.”

    The speaker describes Israel as an occupying, genocidal, apartheid state based on settlements.

    The occupation and settlement components are supported by international institutions, and major human-rights organizations have concluded that Israeli policies meet the legal definition of apartheid. However, “genocide” remains a disputed legal allegation rather than a final adjudicated finding, so the combined assertion is contested as stated.

    The checker returned Contested but could not quote a source on each side of the dispute, so this is recorded as unverifiable.

    Sources

  63. Claim 63
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 27:55
    “They're telling the United Nation resolution all the time. They're killing the the the security council resolution”

    Israel has created settlements in occupied Palestinian territory that the UN Security Council considers legally invalid and contrary to international law.

    The wording is imprecise, but the underlying assertion that Israel’s settlement activity violates Security Council resolutions is supported by Resolution 2334, which says the settlements have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant violation of international law. The transcript does not specify particular resolutions or violations.

    Sources

  64. Claim 64
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 28:04
    “why there is kind of democracy when they now describe Hamas as terrorist organization”

    Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization by the United States.

    The United States designated Hamas as a Foreign Terrorist Organization in October 1997. The designation is a legal classification by the U.S. government, not a universally shared classification by every government.

    Sources

  65. Claim 65
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 28:23
    “I think the existence of Israel is very dangerous for the Middle East for the whole world.”

    Israel is dangerous for the Middle East and the whole world.

    “Dangerous” and “for the whole world” are not defined in a way that permits a clear, objective test. The statement could refer to military conflict, regional instability, or broader global effects, each of which would require different evidence.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  66. Claim 66
    Accurate91% confidence▶ 29:23
    “This is the guy who became infamous very quickly after October the 7th for saying publicly, "We want to do this again and again and again and calling for the annihilation of Israel."”

    A Hamas official said after October 7 that Hamas wanted to repeat the attack again and again and called for Israel’s annihilation.

    Ghazi Hamad, a senior Hamas political official, was reported as saying that Hamas would repeat the October 7 attack again and again until Israel was annihilated. The transcript’s wording is a paraphrase of that reported statement.

    Sources

  67. Claim 67
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 30:17
    “Unfortunately, what we have done by funding the state of Israel is we've essentially put our name on everything that the Israelis have done to the Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank now for decades.”

    The United States has funded Israel for decades.

    The United States has provided Israel with bilateral assistance and missile-defense funding for decades, including a $38 billion military-aid memorandum covering fiscal years 2019–2028. The additional assertion that this places the U.S. name on everything Israel has done is rhetorical and not independently measurable, but the checkable funding claim is supported.

    Sources

  68. Claim 68
    Unverifiable83% confidence▶ 30:29
    “And that's come back to cost us in a very very big way in terms of blowback terrorism in terms of the way the whole region views us.”

    U.S. support for Israel has caused blowback terrorism against the United States.

    The claim asserts a causal relationship but does not define which terrorist attacks constitute the alleged blowback or establish how much U.S. support for Israel caused them. Research and official assessments discuss anti-American sentiment and terrorism risks in the region, but they do not provide a definitive, generally accepted causal finding matching this broad formulation.

    Sources

  69. Claim 69
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 32:27
    “And to say that there weren't atrocities committed, I mean, it's”

    Atrocities were committed during the October 7, 2023 attacks.

    The United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry found that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups committed serious violations on October 7, 2023, including acts amounting to war crimes. Thus, the speaker's assertion that atrocities occurred is supported, although the excerpt does not specify which acts he means.

    Sources

  70. Claim 70
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 32:38
    “But the moment you start taking children as prisoners and then taking them across borders, that's a big problem.”

    Children were abducted from Israel and taken across the border to Gaza as hostages during the October 7, 2023 attacks.

    United Nations investigations verified that children were abducted in southern Israel on October 7, 2023 and taken to Gaza. The sources describe them as hostages rather than ordinary prisoners, but that terminology difference does not change the underlying factual assertion that children were taken across an international boundary and held captive.

    Sources

  71. Claim 71
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 33:39
    “Israel and Egypt have had a peace deal for decades.”

    Israel and Egypt have maintained a peace deal for decades.

    The Egyptian-Israeli Peace Treaty was signed on March 26, 1979, and remains the basis of relations between the two countries. As of 2026, that is more than 47 years.

    Sources

  72. Claim 72
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 33:53
    “it's Hamas has agreed to give up its weapons. That's of the deal.”

    Hamas agreed to give up its weapons as part of the referenced deal.

    The transcript does not identify the deal, its date, or its text, and the available record does not establish which specific agreement the speaker means. Without that identification, the assertion cannot be checked as stated.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  73. Claim 73
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 34:16
    “Now, Israel says, "No, we don't want the deal and we're going to keep 70% of Gaza." So, peers, you know that I said on this show that this was never about self-defense. It was about land acquisition. And here they are sitting on 70% of Gaza. They basically forced over 2 million Palestinians into 30% of Gaza”

    Israel controls 70% of Gaza and has forced more than two million Palestinians into the remaining 30%.

    The claim depends on an unspecified deal, an unspecified date, and undefined measurements of territorial control and population concentration. Although UN sources document mass displacement and an increasingly restricted area for civilians, they do not verify these precise 70%-30% figures for the referenced moment.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

    • 1Gaza Strip Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment

      BackgroundOver 1.9 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip have been internally displaced to locations inside of the Gaza Strip, many of them multiple times over; and over 1.2 million people —almost 60 percent of Gaza Strip’s population—have lost their homes.

    • 2OHCHR: Intensified Israeli attacks in Gaza

      BackgroundMeanwhile, the Palestinian population in Gaza remains trapped in an ever-shrinking area, with the “yellow line” constantly being moved westwards by the Israeli occupying power.

  74. Claim 74
    Misleading94% confidence▶ 34:44
    “Now, Israel takes thousands upon thousands of hostages. They never charge them with any crime.”

    Israel holds thousands of Palestinians without charging them with crimes.

    UN reporting supports that thousands of Palestinians have been detained, many without charge or trial. However, calling all such detainees “hostages” and saying they are never charged with any crime conflates distinct categories and overstates the evidence.

    Omits: The statement omits that these people are generally described by authorities and human-rights bodies as detainees or prisoners, not uniformly as hostages, and that some are held under administrative or security-detention laws rather than being entirely outside a legal framework.

    Sources

  75. Claim 75
    Misleading91% confidence▶ 34:52
    “Then, they systematically torture and rape them.”

    Israeli authorities systematically torture and rape Palestinian detainees.

    UN investigations have reported systematic or routine torture, sexual violence, and some rape allegations in Israeli detention facilities. But the wording “torture and rape them” generalizes from documented patterns and cases to the entire group, which the cited evidence does not establish.

    Omits: The statement leaves out that the documented evidence concerns patterns, allegations, and specific incidents involving some detainees; it does not establish that every person in the referenced group was raped or that rape was inflicted on all detainees.

    Sources

  76. Claim 76
    Unverifiable95% confidence▶ 35:05
    “in terms of 70 times the civilians killed, we all know why we don't have peace.”

    Israel has killed 70 times as many civilians as Hamas.

    The comparison lacks a time period, geographic scope, and a reliable definition and count of civilians killed by each side. Available UN reporting documents very high Palestinian civilian casualties and crimes by Palestinian armed groups, but does not substantiate this exact 70-to-1 civilian ratio.

    Sources

  77. Claim 77
    Unverifiable98% confidence▶ 35:09
    “There's only one reason and it's Israel.”

    Israel is the only reason there is no peace between Israel and Hamas.

    This is a sweeping causal claim about a complex conflict, but “only reason” has no agreed operational test. The historical record documents actions and stated objectives by multiple parties, so the exclusive causal attribution cannot be established from verifiable evidence.

    Sources

    • 1UN report on the October 7 attacks and Gaza conflict

      BackgroundOn and after 7 October 2023, Palestinian armed groups committed war crimes and possible crimes against humanity when they horrifically attacked civilians in Israel, killed at least 1,124, took and kept hostages, and fired thousands of unguided missiles into Israel for over a year.

  78. Claim 78
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 35:28
    “Now 18 Americans have died and apparently they owed Israel their lives and over 400 Americans injured all for Israel.”

    The United States has suffered 18 deaths and more than 400 injuries in actions undertaken for Israel.

    The numerical claim does not identify the conflict, dates, or whether it refers to military personnel, civilians, or both, while “all for Israel” is an unbounded causal attribution. The transcript therefore does not provide a sufficiently defined claim for reliable verification.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  79. Claim 79
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 36:22
    “They have a worse civilian kill ratio”

    Israel has a worse civilian kill ratio than Hamas.

    The claim does not define what “civilian kill ratio” means—civilian deaths divided by total deaths, civilian-to-combatant deaths, or another measure—or specify the time period and dataset. Without those terms, the comparison cannot be tested consistently.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  80. Claim 80
    Unverifiable90% confidence▶ 36:24
    “they've killed at a bare minimum 70 times the number of civilians.”

    Israel has killed at least 70 times as many civilians as Hamas.

    The comparison is not well-posed because the speaker does not identify the time period, whether the comparison concerns Israeli versus Palestinian civilians, or how civilian status and deaths are counted. Available casualty reporting does not by itself verify the precise “70 times” ratio.

    Sources

  81. Claim 81
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 36:30
    “They incinerated 23,000 children.”

    The number of Palestinian children killed in Gaza was 23,000, and they were incinerated by Israel.

    UNICEF and UN reporting document thousands of Palestinian children reportedly killed in Gaza, but the claim's wording changes that into the more specific assertion that Israel incinerated them. The evidence cited by humanitarian agencies does not support that characterization.

    Omits: The available humanitarian reporting describes children as reportedly killed, not as all having been incinerated; it also does not establish that every child death resulted from direct burning or incineration.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  82. Claim 82
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 37:44
    “the land of Palestine. Palestine which it extends from the river Jordan in the east to the Mediterranean in the west and from Raz al- Nakura in the north to um Al Shash in the south is an integral territorial unit.”

    The 2017 Hamas policy document defines Palestine as extending from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea and from Ras al-Nakura in the north to Umm al-Rashrash in the south.

    The quoted geographic description matches the territory described in paragraph 2 of Hamas’s 2017 Document of General Principles and Policies, notwithstanding transcription and transliteration errors in the video.

    Sources

    • 12017 Hamas charter

      SupportsUnder the heading 'The Land of Palestine' (paragraph 2), the document names the geographical borders of Palestine, 'which extends from the River Jordan in the east to the Mediterranean in the west and from Ras Al-Naqurah in the north to Umm Al-Rashrash in the south'.

    • 2Hamas’s new political document: Full text

      SupportsPalestine, which extends from the River Jordan in the east to the Mediterranean in the west and from Ras Al-Naqurah in the north to Umm Al-Rashrash in the south, is an integral territorial unit.

  83. Claim 83
    Accurate93% confidence▶ 38:21
    “there were zero Israeli troops inside of Gaza on October 7th.”

    There were no Israeli troops inside Gaza on October 7, 2023.

    Contemporary accounts describe the October 7 attack as Hamas-led forces crossing from Gaza into Israel, while Israel’s ground entry into Gaza began later, on October 27, 2023. The claim is therefore accurate for October 7 itself.

    Sources

  84. Claim 84
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 38:47
    “the occupation with all means and methods is a legitimate right guaranteed by divine laws and by international norms and laws. At the heart of the these lie armed resistance”

    The occupation and armed resistance by all means and methods are legitimate rights guaranteed by divine and international law.

    International law recognizes rules concerning occupation and, in some contexts, peoples' self-determination, but it does not make every form of armed resistance lawful. The claim's categorical phrase 'all means and methods' is contradicted by binding rules limiting conduct in war.

    Omits: International humanitarian law does not grant an unrestricted right to use all means and methods: it prohibits deliberate attacks on civilians, indiscriminate attacks, hostage-taking, rape and other war crimes.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1Frequently asked questions: Rules of war

      RefutesFor example, the following acts would constitute war crimes in all armed conflicts: Deliberately targeting civilians which are not directly taking part in hostilities; Pillage; Hostage-taking; Making religious or cultural objects the object of attack, provided that they are not military objectives; Torture and other forms of inhumane treatment; Child recruitment; Rape and other forms of sexual violence.

    • 2What is IHL?

      RefutesParties to a conflict do not have an unrestricted right to choose methods or means of warfare.

    • 3Occupation and international humanitarian law: Questions and answers

      BackgroundThe legality of any particular occupation is regulated by the UN Charter and the law known as jus ad bellum.

  85. Claim 85
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 39:40
    “Hamas killed a Hers Goldberg. He was taken hostage.”

    Hamas killed Hersh Goldberg-Polin after taking him hostage.

    Hersh Goldberg-Polin was taken hostage during the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack and was later reported killed by Hamas along with five other hostages.

    Sources

  86. Claim 86
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 40:05
    “Israel has killed 10 US citizens in the last three years. No one has been arrested.”

    Israel killed 10 U.S. citizens in the last three years and no one was arrested for those killings.

    The claim does not define whether 'Israel' includes Israeli soldiers, police, settlers or other actors, nor which three-year period is intended. Available reporting documents several U.S. citizens killed by Israeli forces or settlers and investigations in some cases, but does not establish the precise total of 10 or the universal claim that nobody was arrested.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  87. Claim 87
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 40:22
    “They take our money. They've taken over $300 billion.”

    The United States has provided Israel more than $300 billion in aid.

    The underlying figure is close to some inflation-adjusted estimates, but the statement omits that qualifier and frames the amount as an unqualified nominal total. Congressional Research Service data previously estimated about $260 billion in constant 2021 dollars through 2023, while later estimates approach $300 billion in constant 2024 dollars.

    Omits: The more-than-$300-billion figure is an inflation-adjusted estimate, while nominal U.S. aid totals are substantially lower; the claim also presents aid as money Israel simply 'took' rather than appropriated assistance.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  88. Claim 88
    False50% confidence▶ 40:26
    “We haven't sent a dime to the Palestinians.”

    The United States has provided no money to Palestinians.

    The United States has provided billions of dollars in assistance to Palestinians, including humanitarian and development aid to the West Bank and Gaza and contributions to UNRWA.

    Sources

  89. Claim 89
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 40:29
    “All we do is fund the endless genocides and wars of Israel because they bribe 94% of our Congress. They bribe people like you and people in media”

    Israel funds wars and genocides because it bribes 94% of the U.S. Congress and media figures.

    The statement combines a causal allegation with a precise '94%' statistic but provides no definition of bribery, population, time period, methodology or evidence. Public campaign-finance and lobbying records cannot by themselves verify the claimed bribery of 94% of Congress or establish the asserted causal link.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  90. Claim 90
    Accurate95% confidence▶ 41:28
    “Netanyahu has said Israel is going to take from the river to the sea.”

    Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would control the area from the river to the sea.

    In January 2024, Netanyahu said that Israel must control the entire area from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. The exact wording is sometimes translated as security control rather than territorial annexation, but the attribution of the statement is supported.

    Sources

  91. Claim 91
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 41:44
    “genocide and they murdered over 76,000 people to do that”

    More than 76,000 people were killed in the Gaza war.

    By mid-2026, reported Palestinian deaths in Gaza had surpassed 73,000, and independent research indicated that official counts likely underreported the total. Thus, by the apparent August 2026 context, “over 76,000” is supported, though the figure includes deaths reported by Gaza authorities and is not independently verified case by case.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  92. Claim 92
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 41:52
    “When they murder 23,000 children, no big deal.”

    More than 23,000 children were killed in Gaza.

    The available UNICEF figure reported at least 21,289 children killed through February 3, 2026, while later UN reporting did not provide a comparable updated cumulative child total. The precise claim that the number had exceeded 23,000 by the time of the video cannot be confirmed from the sources located.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  93. Claim 93
    Unverifiable94% confidence▶ 42:34
    “right now Israel has a worse civilian ratio than Hamas.”

    Israel has a worse civilian casualty ratio than Hamas.

    The claim does not define the relevant period, whether “ratio” means civilian-to-combatant deaths or the proportion of civilian casualties, or what Hamas denominator is being used. Available sources explicitly note that Gaza casualty data do not distinguish civilians from combatants and that methodologies produce differing estimates.

    Sources

  94. Claim 94
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 43:17
    “the United States would have unleashed the biggest bombardment against Iran that the world has seen since World War II.”

    Trump said the United States was planning the biggest attack against Iran since World War II.

    Contemporaneous reporting confirms that Trump said a plan was in place for what he called “the biggest attack since World War II” against Iran. The transcript presents this as Trump’s own statement, rather than as an independently established comparison of bombardment size.

    Sources

  95. Claim 95
    Accurate94% confidence▶ 43:29
    “And it was yanked at the last minute after direct appeals to the president by the crown prince of Saudi Arabia and other allies.”

    Trump canceled the planned Iran bombardment at the last minute after direct appeals from Saudi Arabia's crown prince and other allies.

    Associated Press reporting says Gulf leaders' input weighed heavily on Trump’s decision to halt the planned strikes and specifically describes the Saudi crown prince’s appeal and concerns about regional and economic escalation.

    Sources

  96. Claim 96
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 43:42
    “we're nearly what five or six months into this war that was supposed to be over in 2 to 3 weeks.”

    The Iran war was expected to end within two or three weeks.

    News reports described the conflict as a five-month-old war, supporting the duration. However, the two-to-three-week expected end date is an unattributed characterization and is not established by the cited reporting.

    Omits: The five-month duration is supported, but the claim gives no source for the assertion that the war was officially expected to end in two or three weeks.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  97. Claim 97
    Misleading90% confidence▶ 43:56
    “The Iranians appear to have a tight control of Australia formoose.”

    Iran had tight control over the Strait of Hormuz.

    “Australia formoose” is evidently a transcription of “Strait of Hormuz.” Iran did assert substantial practical control by disrupting or closing shipping, but describing this as “tight control” overstates the extent because the strait remained contested and U.S. forces continued operations there.

    Omits: The statement omits that Iran's control was coercive and partial rather than uncontested legal or military control: shipping was heavily disrupted or blocked, while U.S. and allied forces continued operating and transiting the strait.

    Sources

  98. Claim 98
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 44:16
    “That is the asymmetric war the Iranians have been waging, and they've been waging it very successfully, it has to be said.”

    Iran has been waging an asymmetric war against Gulf states and doing so very successfully.

    The existence of Iranian or Iran-linked attacks across Gulf states is documented, but “very successfully” has no defined measure or threshold. Without specifying whether success means military damage, political coercion, economic disruption, or another outcome, the evaluative claim cannot be objectively judged.

    Sources

  99. Claim 99
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 45:05
    “we are up against the tight timeline of major economic shock coming from what's taking place in the streets of Bermoose, Baba Alam with the Houthis.”

    The war has created a major economic shock affecting the global economy.

    Reporting supports that the Iran war has jolted energy markets and the world economy, but the transcript’s wording attributes the shock to unclear or apparently garbled locations and events. Because the specific causal description is not intelligible enough to verify as stated, it creates a misleading impression of a precisely identified economic mechanism.

    Omits: The quote appears to conflate events involving the Strait of Hormuz, Iran, and the Houthis, and does not identify a measurable economic shock or clarify what “Bermoose, Baba Alam” refers to.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  100. Claim 100
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 45:41
    “Iran has agreed that they aren't going to have a nuclear weapon because the Iranians agreed with that before the foolish war.”

    Iran had agreed before the war not to possess a nuclear weapon.

    The speaker presents Iran's alleged prewar nuclear commitment as an established component of the agreement. Reporting on the initial 2026 agreement said the nuclear issue had not yet been resolved, while the White House circulated the claim that Iran had agreed never to possess a nuclear weapon as a political talking point.

    Omits: The initial U.S.-Iran agreement did not include a new Iranian nuclear commitment; negotiations on the nuclear issue were left for a later final agreement.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  101. Claim 101
    Accurate97% confidence▶ 46:02
    “the Israelis were the ones that got President Trump into this. They're the ones that got us on board with killing the Ayatollah”

    The United States and Israel killed Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

    Reporting states that U.S. and Israeli forces launched the February 28, 2026 attack and that Ali Khamenei was killed in the operation. The quote also contains a separate causal assertion about Israel’s influence over Trump, which is evaluated separately below.

    Sources

  102. Claim 102
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 46:02
    “the Israelis were the ones that got President Trump into this”

    Israel was the party that caused President Trump to bring the United States into the war.

    Reliable reporting supports the narrower claim that Israel lobbied Trump and influenced the decision, but the stronger claim that Israel was the party that got the United States into the war is disputed because Trump and other officials have described the decision and sequence differently.

    The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.

    Sources

  103. Claim 103
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 46:43
    “Trump has the imperative of the midterm elections coming”

    The U.S. midterm elections are approaching.

    The 2026 U.S. federal midterm elections are scheduled for November 3, 2026, making them upcoming as of the transcript’s apparent August 2026 date.

    Sources

  104. Claim 104
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 48:01
    “it happened even back in 1978 with Carter and uh what we did with Egypt there”

    The 1978 Carter-Egypt initiative refers to the Camp David Accords involving Egypt and Israel.

    In September 1978, President Jimmy Carter, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin signed the Camp David Accords, which established a framework for an Egypt-Israel peace treaty.

    Sources

    • 1Camp David Accords and the Arab-Israeli Peace Process

      SupportsThe Camp David Accords, signed by President Jimmy Carter, Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in September 1978, established a framework for a historic peace treaty concluded between Israel and Egypt in March 1979.

  105. Claim 105
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 48:16
    “on my birthday, April 10th, 1998, something about the Good Friday up in uh in um North Ireland with England”

    The Good Friday Agreement was signed on April 10, 1998.

    April 10, 1998, is the correct date for the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement. However, the description of the parties as Northern Ireland and England is materially incomplete and inaccurate.

    Omits: The agreement was between the British and Irish governments and most major political parties in Northern Ireland; describing it simply as an agreement involving “North Ireland with England” omits Ireland’s role and the multiparty character of the settlement.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1The Belfast Agreement

      SupportsThe Belfast Agreement, also known as the Good Friday Agreement, was signed on 10 April 1998.

    • 2Belfast Good Friday Agreement 1998

      RefutesIt was an agreement between the British and Irish governments, and most of the political parties in Northern Ireland, on how Northern Ireland should be governed.

  106. Claim 106
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 48:25
    “That only took 12 years with people who wanted to”

    The Good Friday peace process took 12 years for the parties involved.

    The statement does not identify the starting event or define what the 12-year period measures. The agreement was signed in 1998, but the asserted duration cannot be judged without knowing which earlier point the speaker is using as the beginning.

    Sources

    • 1The Belfast Agreement

      BackgroundThe Belfast Agreement, also known as the Good Friday Agreement, was signed on 10 April 1998.

  107. Claim 107
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 49:10
    “the Ayatollah's son who is almost certainly from all reports more hardline and radical than his father”

    Mojtaba Khamenei is almost certainly more hardline and radical than his father, Ali Khamenei.

    Some credible reporting characterizes Mojtaba Khamenei as hardline and expects him to be more hardline than his father, while the Associated Press reported that his views are not well known and that some observers see the possibility of moderation. The specific comparative conclusion remains unresolved.

    The intensifiers “almost certainly” and “more hardline and radical” were judged as stated; available reporting supports the general characterization but also records credible uncertainty and opposing assessments.

    The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.

    Sources

  108. Claim 108
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 49:44
    “We uh claimed that it was for a nuclear weapons program which they didn't have, right?”

    Iran did not have a nuclear-weapons program when the war began.

    The statement is defensible only if “nuclear weapons program” means an active, coordinated weaponization effort at that time. Taken literally, it creates the false impression that Iran had no nuclear-related enrichment program or history of weapons-relevant work.

    Omits: The IAEA found no credible indications of continuing weaponization activities after 2009, but Iran did have a substantial nuclear program involving uranium enrichment and had conducted activities relevant to possible weapons development in the past.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1IAEA Annual Report 2015

      Supportshad no credible indications of activities in Iran relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device after 2009.

    • 2Iran’s Nuclear Program: Status

      RefutesIran and the IAEA agreed in 2007 on a work plan to clarify outstanding questions regarding Tehran’s nuclear program, most of which concerned possible Iranian procurement activities and research directly applicable to nuclear weapons development.

  109. Claim 109
    False99% confidence▶ 49:54
    “we had ended their nuclear weapons program under the Obama deal to begin with, right? They were shipping out all of their uranium. They had no chance of enrichment at that point.”

    The Obama-era nuclear deal ended Iran’s nuclear-weapons program by shipping out all its uranium and eliminating its ability to enrich uranium.

    The JCPOA sharply restricted Iran’s enrichment program and required most of its enriched-uranium stockpile to be removed or reduced, but it did not end enrichment or eliminate Iran’s remaining nuclear material and centrifuges. The agreement therefore does not support the transcript’s absolute wording.

    Sources

  110. Claim 110
    Unverifiable86% confidence▶ 50:03
    “The Israelis demanded that we get out of that deal so they would have an excuse for this war.”

    Israel demanded that the United States withdraw from the Obama-era nuclear deal in order to create an excuse for war.

    Israel publicly opposed the JCPOA and urged the United States to abandon it, but the specific causal and intentional claim that this was done to create an excuse for a later war is not established by the cited historical record.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  111. Claim 111
    Accurate92% confidence▶ 50:46
    “because that's what the war created, that it being blocked.”

    The war caused the Strait of Hormuz to become blocked.

    Contemporary reporting describes Iran effectively closing or choking the Strait of Hormuz after the war began. The wording simplifies the sequence of events, but the substantive claim that the war produced the blockage is supported.

    Sources

  112. Claim 112
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 51:01
    “No nuclear weapons program”

    A deal would result in Iran having no nuclear-weapons program.

    The available evidence supports major damage to Iranian nuclear facilities, not proof that Iran would have no nuclear program at all. The IAEA reported that the on-site condition required further investigation, so the categorical formulation overstates what was established.

    Omits: The statement omits that U.S. officials described the strikes as severely degrading or delaying Iran's nuclear program, while the IAEA said it lacked information about the facilities' condition and the whereabouts of Iran's nuclear material.

    Sources

  113. Claim 113
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 51:22
    “that they can block the straight of Hormuz whenever we wanted.”

    Iran can block the Strait of Hormuz whenever it wants.

    Iran has demonstrated the ability to close or severely disrupt shipping through the strait, but "whenever" has no agreed operational meaning and cannot be established as an unlimited capability. Physical, military, legal and political constraints make the absolute wording untestable as stated.

    The intensifier "whenever" makes this an absolute claim about Iran's ability to close the waterway under any circumstances. I judged that reading; a narrower claim that Iran can seriously disrupt shipping is supported.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  114. Claim 114
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 52:29
    “They're the terror literally the worst civilian kill ratio of any terrorist group in the world.”

    Israel has the worst civilian-kill ratio of any terrorist group in the world.

    The claim lacks agreed definitions for both "civilian kill ratio" and the comparison class "terrorist group," and it treats Israel as a terrorist group without specifying a recognized classification. Available sources also show that casualty-ratio calculations vary by methodology, so the global superlative cannot be verified as stated.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  115. Claim 115
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 52:52
    “The American people are very clear, 60% and rising, saying, "End our relationship with Israel."”

    Sixty percent and rising of Americans want to end the U.S. relationship with Israel.

    A 2026 Pew survey found that 60% of Americans viewed Israel unfavorably, but that is not equivalent to wanting to end the U.S.-Israel relationship. Other 2026 polling found substantial opposition to some forms of support while still measuring the relationship separately, so the transcript conflates distinct questions.

    Omits: The relevant polling measures unfavorable views of Israel or opposition to particular policies, not support for ending diplomatic relations altogether.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  116. Claim 116
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 53:29
    “I think that's the legal excuse for the United States to go in there because in June he said that we had completely and totally obliterated their nuclear weapons program after operation midnight hammer set them back”

    U.S. officials said after Operation Midnight Hammer that Iran's nuclear-weapons program had been completely or totally obliterated.

    The speaker accurately reports what was said by the U.S. president, but the underlying assertion that the entire nuclear weapons program was “completely and totally obliterated” is not supported. Expert assessments describe major damage to enrichment facilities while noting that important nuclear material and reconstruction capability remained.

    Omits: The strikes severely damaged key facilities but did not establish that Iran's entire nuclear weapons capability, including its stockpile, knowledge, personnel, and ability to rebuild, was eliminated.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  117. Claim 117
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 53:45
    “only two countries in the world might be able to get it out which is going to be either the USA or China in reference to their highlyenriched uranium that was buried.”

    Only the United States or China might be able to extract the buried highly enriched uranium.

    The transcript does not identify the site, material, technical method, or the person being quoted. Without those details, the claim that only the United States or China could retrieve it cannot be independently tested.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  118. Claim 118
    Misleading94% confidence▶ 54:13
    “International law clearly lays the strmuz out as international waters.”

    The Strait of Hormuz is international waters under international law.

    UNCLOS states that transit passage applies through international straits but does not alter the legal status of the waters forming those straits. Thus ships generally have a transit-passage right, but the speaker's categorical description of the strait as international waters is misleading.

    Omits: The Strait of Hormuz includes waters under the sovereignty or jurisdiction of Iran and Oman; international law provides ships a right of transit passage through the strait, which is different from classifying all of it as international waters.

    Sources

  119. Claim 119
    Accurate89% confidence▶ 54:19
    “Ships are allowed to pass through that water in accordance with international law without Iran say so.”

    Ships may transit the Strait of Hormuz without Iran's permission under international law.

    UNCLOS provides ships and aircraft a right of transit passage through qualifying international straits, and says that such passage shall not be impeded. That right is subject to the convention's conditions and does not mean the waters are outside coastal-state jurisdiction.

    Sources

  120. Claim 120
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 54:37
    “Even Israel agreed to withdraw troops in a phased withdrawal. They're going to retrograde and be replaced by the Lebanese armed forces”

    A US-mediated framework provides for a phased Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon and Lebanese forces taking over areas Israel leaves.

    Reporting on the June 2026 framework says Israel is to gradually withdraw from occupied areas in southern Lebanon and that the Lebanese Armed Forces will assume security in areas vacated by Israel. The arrangement's implementation and timetable remained subject to conditions and negotiation.

    Sources

  121. Claim 121
    Accurate78% confidence▶ 54:43
    “the Lebanese armed forces, which are only about 80,000 strong”

    The Lebanese Armed Forces number about 80,000 personnel.

    An EU Agency for Asylum country report estimates the Lebanese Armed Forces at approximately 80,000 personnel. Other estimates differ, so the figure is best understood as an approximation rather than an exact count.

    Sources

  122. Claim 122
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 55:13
    “They control southern Lebanon, southern Syria, Gaza, and the West Bank as we speak. They have 70% of Gaza.”

    Israel controls southern Lebanon, southern Syria, Gaza, and the West Bank, including 70% of Gaza.

    UN reporting and other coverage support that Israeli authorities sought or exercised control over up to 70% of Gaza. But the sentence presents that figure alongside an unqualified claim of control over several larger regions, which overstates the geographic scope and ignores distinctions between military presence, occupation, security control, and administrative control.

    Omits: The 70% figure referred to areas under Israeli control inside Gaza, while Israel did not control all of southern Lebanon, all of southern Syria, or the entire West Bank; the extent and type of control varied by area.

    Sources

  123. Claim 123
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 56:09
    “they agreed to store their weapons and the Hamas spokesperson just said that they're going to continue to resist the occupation”

    The Gaza agreement required Hamas to disarm and Israel to withdraw, while Hamas officials said weapons would be collected and stored and resistance would continue.

    The published deal text describes decommissioning and storing Hamas weapons and provides for a phased Israeli withdrawal. AP also reported that Hamas officials said arms would be collected and stored rather than surrendered to Israel, while Hamas's founding position continues to endorse armed resistance.

    Sources

  124. Claim 124
    Accurate96% confidence▶ 57:23
    “it was at Tucker Carlson's home. Uh, you're in there with Marjorie Taylor Green, Thomas Massie, Tucker. Um, what was this? There is word that you're all planning, uh, as Marjorie Taylor Green put it, a new political movement.”

    A photo taken at Tucker Carlson's home included Joe Kent, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie and Tucker Carlson, and Greene described the gathering as connected to a new political movement.

    Contemporary reporting described a gathering at Tucker Carlson's Maine home involving Marjorie Taylor Greene, Thomas Massie and Joe Kent, and reported Greene's suggestion that a new movement was forming.

    Sources

  125. Claim 125
    Unverifiable88% confidence▶ 57:48
    “there is a growing consensus on, I think, both the right and the left of people who are sick and tired of the Republican party. They're sick and tired of the Democrat party.”

    There is a growing consensus among people on both the political right and left who are dissatisfied with the Republican and Democratic parties.

    The claim does not define “growing consensus,” “the right and the left,” or how dissatisfaction is to be measured. Available polling can measure party approval or support for alternatives, but cannot confirm this precise assertion without operational criteria.

    Sources

  126. Claim 126
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 58:01
    “Most Americans have no idea what we're talking about. They don't know about Gaza. They don't know about the Straits of Hormuz.”

    Most Americans have no idea what the speaker is discussing, including Gaza and the Strait of Hormuz.

    “Have no idea” and “don’t know” are not operationally defined, and no survey is cited for awareness of both Gaza and the Strait of Hormuz. A Pew survey found limited attention to the Israel-Hamas war, but also found that 80% correctly identified Hamas as the group that attacked Israel, so the available evidence does not directly test the claim as phrased.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  127. Claim 127
    Accurate94% confidence▶ 58:07
    “They just know that billions of their taxpayer dollars, their blood, their treasure, their sons and their daughters continue to get sent overseas.”

    Billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars continue to be spent overseas, including on assistance related to Israel and regional military operations.

    Congressional Research Service records show multibillion-dollar U.S. appropriations for Israel and related defense programs, while the Defense Department documents substantial overseas military costs. The sentence is broad but its core assertion that billions in U.S. public funds are spent overseas is supported.

    Sources

  128. Claim 128
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 58:10
    “their sons and their daughters continue to get sent overseas. Our best and brightest get killed.”

    U.S. service members are being sent overseas and some are being killed in overseas operations.

    Department of Defense casualty records list deaths in overseas operations, including recent U.S. military deaths, and official budget documents account for overseas military personnel and operations. “Best and brightest” is rhetorical, but the underlying claim about service members being deployed and killed overseas is supported.

    Sources

  129. Claim 129
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 59:51
    “The images of 60,000 male migrants rushing into Seut are shocking and terrifying, no matter what your political views may be.”

    An estimated 60,000 male migrants rushed into Ceuta.

    Spanish officials estimated that about 60,000 migrants entered Ceuta, so the number is broadly supported. However, describing them as male migrants omits the documented presence of women, children and families, creating a misleading impression about the group’s composition.

    Omits: The crossing involved tens of thousands of people, including women and children; AP reported that more than 800 minors remained in Ceuta and described families among those crossing.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  130. Claim 130
    Misleading93% confidence▶ 59:59
    “Spain says that almost all of the men have now been sent back across the small border its exclave shares with Morocco.”

    Almost all of the migrants were sent back across the Ceuta-Morocco border.

    Spain did report that most people who crossed had returned to Morocco. However, reporting described many of those returns as voluntary and estimated that roughly 3,000–5,000 migrants remained, so “almost all ... sent back” gives an overly coercive and overly complete impression.

    Omits: The large majority reportedly returned voluntarily to Morocco, while thousands remained in Ceuta; the statement omits both the voluntary nature of most returns and the substantial number who had not been returned.

    Sources

  131. Claim 131
    Accurate100% confidence▶ 1:01:02
    “Now to be clear, Suta is on the North African coast. It's a Spanish territory.”

    Ceuta is on the North African coast and is Spanish territory.

    Ceuta is a Spanish autonomous city and exclave on the North African coast, bordering Morocco.

    Sources

    • 1Ceuta

      SupportsCeuta, Spanish exclave, military post, and free port on the coast of Morocco, at the entrance to the Mediterranean Sea.

  132. Claim 132
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 1:01:06
    “Has been for almost 500 years.”

    Ceuta has been Spanish territory for almost 500 years.

    Ceuta remained under the Spanish crown when Portugal separated from Spain in 1640, and Spanish control was formally recognized in 1668. Counting from 1580, when Portugal entered the Iberian Union under the Spanish monarchy, makes “almost 500 years” a reasonable broad description, though uninterrupted formal Spanish sovereignty is closer to 386 years as of 2026.

    Sources

    • 1Ceuta

      SupportsDuring the Union with Spain, 1580 to 1640, Ceuta attracted many residents of Spanish origin and became the only city of the Portuguese Empire that sided with Spain when Portugal regained its independence in the Portuguese Restoration War of 1640.

    • 2Spanish Empire

      BackgroundThe formal allegiance of Ceuta to Spain was recognized by the Treaty of Lisbon in 1668.

  133. Claim 133
    False50% confidence▶ 1:01:09
    “But migrants have to claim asylum or they're sent back.”

    Migrants in Ceuta must claim asylum or they are sent back.

    Migrants who enter irregularly may seek asylum, but Spanish authorities also process people through immigration and humanitarian-reception systems, and returns require applicable legal procedures. The claim incorrectly presents asylum as the only alternative to being sent back.

    Sources

    • 1Humanitarian Care Program - Migrations

      RefutesThe Humanitarian Care Programme is aimed at meeting the basic needs of immigrants in situations of vulnerability due to physical deterioration and lack of social, family and economic support, who arrive on the Spanish coast or enter our country by land, through the cities of Ceuta and Melilla.

    • 2Seeking Asylum in Spain - UNHCR Spain

      BackgroundIf you are at a port, airport or the land borders of Ceuta or Melilla, inform the National Police or Civil Guard that you want to apply for asylum.

  134. Claim 134
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:01:11
    “Very few make it onto the mainland, but it doesn't stop them trying.”

    Very few migrants from Ceuta make it to mainland Spain.

    The claim correctly conveys that mainland Spain is not automatically accessible from Ceuta and that asylum and expulsion procedures are relevant. But it oversimplifies the legal pathways, especially for minors and people subject to due-process protections, and presents “claim asylum or be sent back” as an exhaustive rule.

    Omits: Spanish law also provides different procedures for adults and unaccompanied minors, and AP reported that none had crossed into mainland EU during the crisis rather than establishing a general rule that migrants must claim asylum or be immediately returned.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  135. Claim 135
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:01:13
    “Similar smaller crushes happen every couple of years.”

    Similar smaller surges into Ceuta happen every couple of years.

    There have been previous surges, including a major crossing of more than 8,000 people in 2021, but “every couple of years” is an imprecise frequency claim that the reliable sources located did not establish.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  136. Claim 136
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:01:17
    “And critics of Spain's Liberal government say a recent amnesty for illegal immigrants drove this extraordinary crush.”

    A recent Spanish amnesty for illegal immigrants drove the mass crossing into Ceuta.

    The claim is presented as the critics’ conclusion rather than as an undisputed fact. U.S. officials blamed Spain’s amnesty, while Spain rejected that premise and AP said the cause of the surge remained unclear, making the causal attribution contested.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  137. Claim 137
    Accurate95% confidence▶ 1:01:50
    “The Moroccan king has just named a major road after Trump. The Donald J. Trump highway stretches into Western Sahara, a massive disputed territory which the US says belongs to Morocco.”

    The Moroccan king named a major highway after Donald Trump, and the highway extends into Western Sahara.

    Reporting in late July 2026 described Morocco’s naming of a major highway after Trump and identified the route as extending through Western Sahara. The United States recognized Moroccan sovereignty over the territory in 2020, while Western Sahara remains internationally disputed.

    Sources

  138. Claim 138
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 1:03:48
    “they were deported.”

    Migrants who arrived in Ceuta were deported or returned.

    Reports and Spanish government statements confirm that many of the people who entered Ceuta were returned to Morocco, although the process and legal status varied and some people, including minors, were not immediately returned.

    Sources

  139. Claim 139
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:04:57
    “more importantly actually orchestrating the moving of almost 50,000 people from one place to the other.”

    Israel and the United States orchestrated the movement of almost 50,000 people to Spain.

    Reliable reporting documents a mass arrival of roughly 50,000–60,000 migrants in Ceuta, but attributes the event to movement from Morocco and does not provide evidence that Israel or the United States organized it. The specific allegation of U.S.-Israeli orchestration cannot be confirmed or refuted from the available evidence.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  140. Claim 140
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:05:25
    “Spain, which never misses an opportunity to lecture Israel, has declared a state of emergency in Seut following the crisis over its immigration policy.”

    Spain declared a state of emergency in Ceuta because of the immigration crisis.

    Spain did mobilize security forces and described the sudden arrivals as a grave crisis, but the cited official accounts do not show that Spain declared a formal state of emergency specifically in Ceuta over immigration. The wording conflates an emergency-like crisis with a legal state-of-emergency declaration.

    Omits: The statement omits that Spanish authorities described the event as a serious migration and humanitarian crisis, but the documented declaration of a formal state of emergency concerned the COVID-19 pandemic nationally, not this Ceuta migration episode.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  141. Claim 141
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:05:36
    “continues lecturing us, it's time it explain to the world why it still maintains colonial enclaves in Africa.”

    Spain maintains two Spanish enclaves in North Africa, Ceuta and Melilla.

    Spain does administer Ceuta and Melilla in North Africa. However, Spain officially treats them as autonomous Spanish cities, while Morocco disputes that status; the characterization "colonial" is therefore a live political and legal dispute rather than an uncontested fact.

    The intensifier "colonial" is judged as stated. The existence of Spanish enclaves in Africa is established, but whether they are properly classified as colonial enclaves is disputed.

    The checker returned Contested but could not quote a source on each side of the dispute, so this is recorded as unverifiable.

    Sources

  142. Claim 142
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 1:07:14
    “Well, first of all, they are a terrorist organization. They've been designated that way. The United States certainly has designated them that.”

    The United States has designated Hamas as a foreign terrorist organization.

    Hamas has been designated a U.S. Foreign Terrorist Organization since 1997. Israel and numerous other governments also classify Hamas as a terrorist organization, although the exact list varies by jurisdiction.

    Sources

  143. Claim 143
    Misleading91% confidence▶ 1:07:29
    “they strapped GoPro cameras to their heads and they videotaped themselves raping, slaughtering beheading butchering massacring women, children, and elderly people.”

    Hamas members recorded themselves with GoPro cameras while committing rape and other killings during the October 7 attack.

    Hamas and other attackers did use body cameras and other recording devices, and UN investigations found reasonable grounds to believe that sexual violence and deliberate killings occurred. The statement misleadingly presents the GoPro footage as direct documentation of all the specified crimes, which the cited investigations do not establish.

    Omits: The available international investigations establish reasonable grounds for sexual violence and deliberate killings, but do not establish that GoPro footage recorded Hamas members carrying out every listed act, especially rape, beheading, and attacks on women, children, and elderly people.

    Sources

  144. Claim 144
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:07:44
    “And they boasted about it. They boasted about it online. They boasted about it in phone calls. They boasted about it on the videotape that they shot.”

    Hamas publicly boasted about its October 7 actions through online material, phone calls, and video recordings.

    Hamas and affiliated channels did publish statements and footage concerning the October 7 attack, including material that celebrated or justified it. The categorical addition that Hamas boasted about the crimes in phone calls is not adequately supported by the available independent evidence.

    Omits: The evidence clearly documents Hamas-produced videos and public statements celebrating or justifying the attack, but the specific assertion about boasting in phone calls is not established by the cited UN findings.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  145. Claim 145
    Misleading94% confidence▶ 1:07:53
    “the naked bodies of young women who had been kidnapped from the Nova Music Festival and paraded them down the streets of Gaza uh beating their dead bodies.”

    A young woman abducted from the Nova festival was taken to Gaza and her dead body was publicly paraded there.

    A widely documented video showed the body of Shani Louk, a Nova festival attendee, being paraded in Gaza. The transcript expands that documented case into a plural claim about naked bodies and beating, which is not established by the cited evidence.

    Omits: The documented case involved Shani Louk, whose body was shown being paraded in Gaza; the evidence does not establish the plural claim that multiple naked bodies of Nova attendees were paraded or that the bodies were beaten during the parade.

    The plural intensifier "bodies" is judged as stated; the evidence supports a singular documented case, not the broader plural formulation.

    Sources

  146. Claim 146
    Unverifiable78% confidence▶ 1:08:19
    “and that's they're going to disarm and demilitarize. They haven't done it yet.”

    Hamas had not disarmed or demilitarized by the time of the interview.

    The claim depends on the unspecified time of the interview and on what the speaker means by "disarm" and "demilitarize." The transcript does not identify the agreement or deadline being referenced, so the assertion cannot be reliably judged from the available evidence.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  147. Claim 147
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 1:09:08
    “President Trump said repeatedly that Hamas has no future in Gaza.”

    President Trump has repeatedly said that Hamas has no future in Gaza.

    Trump and senior U.S. officials have repeatedly stated that Hamas should have no future governing Gaza. Independent reporting records the administration making this position explicit.

    Sources

  148. Claim 148
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:10:01
    “he reiterated to me what he was saying publicly that you know he was ready locked and loaded to launch the biggest bombardment of Iran that the world had seen since World War II.”

    Trump said that a planned U.S. attack on Iran would be the biggest attack since World War II.

    Trump did publicly describe a planned operation as the biggest attack since World War II. The transcript adds the narrower formulation "of Iran" and presents it as a bombardment, while the historical comparison was Trump's own claim rather than an independently verified ranking.

    Omits: The cited reporting describes Trump's wording as the "biggest attack since World War II," not specifically the biggest bombardment of Iran; it also records this as Trump's characterization of a planned attack, not an independently established historical comparison.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  149. Claim 149
    Accurate90% confidence▶ 1:10:38
    “in having talked to many people in the Gulf countries and they urged him to give, as John Linen would so brilliantly say, give peace a chance to give one more round of negotiations an opportunity. And he made that decision.”

    Gulf-country leaders urged Trump to give negotiations another chance, and Trump decided to delay the military option.

    Reporting confirms that Gulf and other Middle Eastern leaders urged de-escalation and negotiations, after which Trump announced that planned strikes would be held off to allow diplomacy more time.

    Sources

  150. Claim 150
    Accurate96% confidence▶ 1:10:56
    “the president has also made it very clear that there is the military option. It's on the table and if he takes it, it's not going to be a mild tap. It is going to be overwhelming.”

    Trump said that the military option against Iran remained available and that any attack would be overwhelming rather than limited.

    Public statements and reporting described U.S. military action against Iran as still available and threatened force on a scale far beyond a limited strike.

    Sources

  151. Claim 151
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:12:17
    “It was based on the fact that for over 47 years Iran has been saying death to America.”

    Iran has used the slogan “death to America” for roughly 47 years since the 1979 revolution.

    The slogan was prominent after Iran’s 1979 revolution and hostage crisis, so by 2026 it had been used for approximately 47 years. The statement is broadly accurate as a description of recurring Iranian revolutionary rhetoric, though it does not establish that every Iranian or every government action expressed that view.

    The checker returned Accurate but could not show evidence for that verdict, so this is recorded as unverifiable.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  152. Claim 152
    Misleading90% confidence▶ 1:12:22
    “They've begged, pleaded, worked, strived to build a nuclear weapon.”

    Iran has worked for decades to build a nuclear weapon.

    Iran has conducted nuclear activities that generated serious proliferation concerns, including undeclared activities and enrichment, but the categorical assertion that it has been striving to build a weapon is stronger than what the cited IAEA record establishes. The IAEA has also reported no evidence, at the time of its assessment, that previously undeclared material and activities were related to a nuclear-weapons program.

    Omits: The claim omits that the IAEA has documented safeguards violations and unresolved concerns but has not established that Iran built or definitively pursued a nuclear weapon; Iran’s declared program includes civilian nuclear activities.

    Sources

  153. Claim 153
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:12:27
    “And for what purpose? To first destroy Israel. That's always been their goal. That's the appetizer. But ultimately, they've said this for 47 years. Their goal is to annihilate America.”

    Iran’s purpose in pursuing a nuclear weapon is first to destroy Israel, and its ultimate goal is to annihilate America.

    Iranian officials and state representatives have made statements calling for Israel’s destruction and using anti-American slogans, but those statements do not prove that annihilating America is the Iranian government’s established ultimate goal or the purpose of its nuclear program. The transcript presents an attributed political interpretation as settled fact.

    Omits: The claim omits the distinction between hostile statements by some Iranian leaders or institutions and a demonstrated, official operational objective to annihilate the United States, as well as the lack of established evidence that Iran’s nuclear program was intended for that purpose.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  154. Claim 154
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:12:51
    “held them hostage, 51 of them for 444 days.”

    Iranian students held 51 U.S. embassy employees hostage for 444 days in 1979–1981.

    Khomeini assumed control of the revolution in February 1979, and the embassy hostage crisis lasted 444 days. However, authoritative U.S. historical records identify 52 hostages, so the quoted numerical claim is wrong and the overall statement is misleading.

    Omits: The hostage count was 52 U.S. citizens, not 51; the episode began on November 4, 1979, and lasted 444 days. The source also describes the captives as Americans, not simply embassy employees.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1Historical Documents: Iran Hostage Crisis

      RefutesThe Iran hostage crisis began on November 4, 1979, when 52 U.S. citizens were taken hostage by Iranian students and militants at the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.

    • 2The Iranian Hostage Crisis - Short History

      SupportsOn November 4, 1979, Iranian students seized the embassy and detained more than 50 Americans, ranging from the Chargé d’Affaires to the most junior members of the staff, as hostages.

    • 3Iran (07/23/10)

      SupportsOn February 1, 1979, exiled religious leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned from France to assume control of the revolution and establish himself as Supreme Leader of a new, theocratic republic guided by Islamic principles.

  155. Claim 155
    Unverifiable84% confidence▶ 1:13:17
    “Hezbollah alone is in 12 Western Hemisphere countries.”

    Hezbollah is present in 12 Western Hemisphere countries.

    Reliable sources confirm Hezbollah activity or networks in parts of the Western Hemisphere, especially the Tri-Border Area, and older congressional testimony cited estimates involving at least 12 countries. However, “is in” is undefined—whether it means operatives, supporters, financiers, cells, or documented organizational infrastructure—and no authoritative source located here establishes exactly 12 countries under a clear definition.

    Sources

  156. Claim 156
    Misleading88% confidence▶ 1:15:03
    “this Iranian regime brutalize its own people, murdering tens of thousands of them for simply protesting”

    The Iranian regime murdered tens of thousands of people for protesting.

    Human-rights investigations have documented unlawful killings by Iranian security forces, including more than 100 people killed on one day during the 2022 protests, and later reports describe thousands killed in subsequent crackdowns. However, the evidence does not establish the speaker's unqualified formulation that the regime murdered tens of thousands specifically for simply protesting.

    Omits: The statement omits that credible investigations have documented thousands of deaths, while estimates in the tens of thousands are disputed and may refer to broader or later protest waves; it also presents all of those killed as people murdered simply for protesting.

    Sources

  157. Claim 157
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:15:42
    “notably in the United States where now nearly twothirds of Americans have a negative view of Israel”

    Nearly two-thirds of Americans have a negative view of Israel.

    Recent polling shows that negative views of Israel are widespread and have increased, but the available Pew figure is 60%, which is closer to three-fifths than nearly two-thirds. The direction of the claim is supported, but its numerical characterization is overstated.

    Omits: The claim omits the survey date and rounds 60% up to “nearly two-thirds”; the cited current Pew result reports 60% unfavorable, not approximately 66%.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  158. Claim 158
    Accurate90% confidence▶ 1:15:50
    “where half the country thinks Netanyahu should be arrested when he comes to the United States”

    Half of Americans think Benjamin Netanyahu should be arrested if he comes to the United States.

    A late-July 2026 Economist/YouGov poll reported that 49% of Americans said U.S. authorities should arrest Netanyahu if he enters the country, which supports the speaker's rounded “half” characterization.

    Sources

  159. Claim 159
    Misleading98% confidence▶ 1:17:02
    “the entirety of the number of Jews on the entire face of the earth is 16 million. Half of whom live in Israel. The other half mostly live in the US”

    The global Jewish population is 16 million, with half living in Israel and most of the remainder living in the United States.

    The total is broadly rounded correctly: the 2024 estimate was 15.74 million. But the geographic breakdown is materially inaccurate: approximately 7.15 million lived in Israel and 6.3 million in the United States, not half in each.

    Omits: The statement omits that Israel contains about 45% of world Jewry and the United States about 40%, rather than half in Israel and half in the United States.

    Sources

    • 1World Jewish Population 2024, Jewish DataBank

      RefutesAs of January 1, 2024, the world’s Jewish population is estimated at 15.74 million, reflecting an increase of approximately 78,800 people (0.5%) over 2023. Israel is home to the world’s largest Jewish population, with 7.15 million Jews, accounting for approximately 45% of world Jewry, followed by the United States with 6.3 million.

  160. Claim 160
    False99% confidence▶ 1:17:17
    “a very small minority of 0.05% 05% of the population of the world”

    Jews make up 0.05% of the world's population.

    Using the cited Jewish-population estimate and the UN's 2025 world-population estimate of 8.2 billion, Jews comprise approximately 0.19% of the global population. A share of 0.05% would correspond to about 4.1 million people.

    Sources

  161. Claim 161
    Unverifiable91% confidence▶ 1:17:34
    “But they are up against a multi-billion dollar propaganda campaign and lot of money being spent in the United States on university campuses, on social media.”

    A multi-billion-dollar propaganda campaign is operating in the United States across universities and social media.

    The statement does not identify the campaign, its sponsors, the spending period, or what counts toward the claimed “multi-billion dollar” total. Without those defined terms, the quantitative assertion cannot be reliably confirmed or refuted.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  162. Claim 162
    Unverifiable88% confidence▶ 1:17:47
    “the bots are everywhere painting a picture of the Jewish people as a whole and the Israelis specifically that is simply absolutely unfounded.”

    Bots are widespread and are portraying Jewish people generally and Israelis specifically in a way that is absolutely unfounded.

    “Bots are everywhere” and “absolutely unfounded” are not operationally defined, and the statement names no particular claims, networks, or dataset. The broad assertion therefore cannot be tested as stated.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  163. Claim 163
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 1:17:58
    “I say that as somebody who's been coming to this country for 53 years since 1973, who lives here now as the US ambassador”

    Mike Huckabee was serving as the U.S. ambassador to Israel and first visited Israel in 1973.

    Mike Huckabee was nominated and confirmed as U.S. ambassador to Israel, and his Senate testimony states that he first visited Israel in 1973. The precise “53 years” wording depends on the interview date and inclusive counting, but the underlying biographical claim is supported.

    Sources

  164. Claim 164
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:19:18
    “one moment you had 60,000 people pouring over a border in an apparent invasion inarguably and the next minute most of them 58 59,000 had been sent right back where they came from.”

    About 60,000 people crossed into Ceuta, and roughly 58,000–59,000 were subsequently sent back to Morocco.

    Contemporary reporting supports an extraordinary influx estimated at roughly 50,000–60,000 people and confirms that many returned to Morocco. However, the precise assertion that 58,000–59,000 had already been sent back is not supported by the cited reporting and presents disputed estimates as settled fact.

    Omits: The statement omits that the 60,000 figure was an estimate and that reports differed substantially on both the number who crossed and the number who returned; some reports described roughly 50,000 crossings and about 37,500 returns at one stage.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  165. Claim 165
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:19:50
    “there are still thousands of people in the city and Italy still has controls on on Spaniard. So, it's not over.”

    Thousands of people remained in Ceuta after the mass crossing, while Italy imposed controls affecting travel with Spain.

    Reporting confirms that hundreds of unaccompanied minors and other migrants remained in Ceuta after the initial returns, but the cited account does not support the speaker’s exact wording that thousands remained at that time. The separate reference to Italy imposing controls on Spain is also unclear in the transcript.

    Omits: The statement does not distinguish between all migrants who crossed and the smaller group of people still present, including unaccompanied minors and migrants from other countries.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  166. Claim 166
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:20:07
    “Morocco sold itself to Washington and to our friends of Israel as their wall in North Africa against Iran, against Algeria, against Russia. That's the deal.”

    Morocco exchanged closer relations with Washington and Israel for strategic benefits involving Western Sahara and regional security.

    Sources support strengthened U.S.–Morocco and Israel–Morocco relations, including Western Sahara and shared concern about Iran. They do not establish the speaker’s comprehensive “that’s the deal” formulation or prove that Morocco was literally positioned as a unified regional wall against all three named adversaries.

    Omits: The statement presents a complex set of diplomatic relationships as a single confirmed bargain and omits that the documented U.S.–Morocco normalization arrangement specifically included U.S. recognition of Morocco’s position on Western Sahara, while the broader “wall” and anti-Russia/anti-Algeria characterization is an interpretation.

    Sources

  167. Claim 167
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:20:39
    “60,000 people are in the water.”

    Approximately 60,000 people were in the water during the migration episode described.

    The claim gives the impression that 60,000 people were simultaneously in the water. European Parliament records approximately 9,000 crossings in the 2021 Ceuta crisis, while AP describes 60,000 as reaching Ceuta over several days, so the wording conflates a cumulative arrival figure with people being in the water at once.

    Omits: The documented 2021 Ceuta episode involved around 9,000 people entering over a period of days, not 60,000 people simultaneously in the water; estimates of 60,000 refer to people reaching Ceuta over several days in a later episode.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  168. Claim 168
    Unverifiable90% confidence▶ 1:21:31
    “I think nobody can mobilize 50,000 people, 60,000 people without the the permission of the king of Morocco.”

    Mobilizing 50,000 or 60,000 people would require permission from Morocco’s king.

    The claim asserts a specific requirement for royal permission, but the available evidence does not establish that every movement of this size requires such permission. Evidence shows Moroccan authorities eased border controls during the 2021 crisis, but that does not prove the king personally authorized it.

    Sources

  169. Claim 169
    Unverifiable98% confidence▶ 1:21:50
    “I'm sure the MOSAD knew what what was going to happen. I'm sure the CIA knew what was going to happen.”

    Mossad and the CIA knew what was going to happen.

    No reliable public evidence was found establishing that either Mossad or the CIA knew in advance about the migration episode. The statement is presented as certainty, but the transcript provides no verifiable evidence for it.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  170. Claim 170
    Accurate94% confidence▶ 1:22:16
    “whenever there's there's something they don't like in the Spanish position, they tend to use migration to to pressure and or to blackmail Spain.”

    Morocco has used migration to pressure Spain, including during the Ceuta crisis.

    This is supported by European Parliament statements describing Morocco’s use of border controls and migration, including minors, as political pressure against Spain. The broader word “whenever” is rhetorical, but the substantive assertion that Morocco used migration pressure in the Ceuta episode is documented.

    Sources

  171. Claim 171
    False50% confidence▶ 1:23:02
    “the Spanish government has been quite the only one in Europe that has denounced genocide in Palestine in Gaza”

    Spain was nearly the only European government to denounce genocide in Gaza.

    Spain was a prominent European critic of Israel and joined South Africa’s ICJ case, but it was not the only European government expressing such condemnation. Ireland and other European governments also publicly described Israel’s actions in Gaza in strongly condemnatory terms, so the exclusivity claim is false.

    Sources

  172. Claim 172
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:23:10
    “who was one of the first that recognized this the Palestinian state”

    Spain was one of the first European countries to recognize the State of Palestine.

    Spain did recognize Palestine on May 28, 2024, and was among the earliest European states to do so in that diplomatic wave. However, describing Spain as 'quite the only one in Europe' to denounce genocide creates a false impression because Ireland, Norway, and other European governments also criticized Israel's conduct and supported Palestinian statehood.

    Omits: Ireland and Norway recognized the State of Palestine on the same date as Spain, May 28, 2024; several other European states had recognized it earlier.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  173. Claim 173
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:23:17
    “Trump is very upset with with Sanchez. We know that and he he has been threatening Spain with cutting all”

    Donald Trump has threatened Spain with ending trade with the country.

    The transcript ends before specifying what Trump allegedly threatened to cut, making the claim incomplete. Public reporting may document tensions or threats concerning trade, but the quoted fragment does not identify the threatened measure precisely enough to verify as stated.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  174. Claim 174
    Accurate93% confidence▶ 1:23:44
    “Morocco is is now a new ali ally for with Israel and and America. They they have supported the Sahara plan for for the king of of Morocco”

    Morocco is a new ally of Israel and the United States and has supported Morocco's Western Sahara autonomy plan.

    Morocco has strengthened diplomatic and security relations with Israel and maintains a close strategic relationship with the United States. Spain, Israel and the United States have supported Morocco's autonomy proposal for Western Sahara, though describing Morocco as a wholly 'new ally' is broad political characterization.

    Sources

  175. Claim 175
    Accurate97% confidence▶ 1:23:59
    “Sanchez went to Alier like two weeks ago and he signed a new increment on the exportations of gas in the in the importations.”

    Pedro Sánchez recently signed an agreement in Algeria to increase gas imports into Spain.

    Reports from July 2026 state that Sánchez traveled to Algeria and reached a political agreement intended to increase Algerian gas supplies to Spain. The transcript's wording is grammatically unclear but its substantive assertion is supported.

    Sources

  176. Claim 176
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 1:24:23
    “Trump called it a catastrophe that looks like an invasion of a country by hundreds of thousands of people.”

    Donald Trump described the Ceuta migration crisis as a catastrophe resembling an invasion by hundreds of thousands of people.

    The quoted wording accurately reports Trump's public characterization of the Spain-related migration event. The claim concerns what Trump said, not whether his description of the scale was accurate.

    Sources

  177. Claim 177
    Accurate91% confidence▶ 1:24:30
    “We know now it was about 60,000.”

    Approximately 60,000 migrants reached Ceuta during the crisis.

    Contemporary reporting placed the number of people who reached Ceuta at approximately 50,000 to 60,000, with some reports using an estimate of about 60,000. The figure is an estimate rather than a definitive census.

    Sources

  178. Claim 178
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:25:39
    “More than 70 people, some were kids. I saw the picture of their bodies. They drowned at night”

    More than 70 people died in the crisis, including children, and some drowned while attempting the crossing.

    Reports describe a death toll above 70 in the immediate aftermath, with children among those affected and migrants drowning during the attempt to reach Ceuta. The precise total varied by source and changed as bodies were recovered.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  179. Claim 179
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:25:45
    “They drowned at night because somebody told them the doors open, go swim.”

    Migrants drowned because they were told that the border was open and to swim.

    Social-media posts did reportedly claim that Spain's border was open, and people attempted to swim to Ceuta. However, available reporting does not support the more specific causal framing that the deaths occurred simply because someone gave the instruction 'go swim.'

    Omits: The reports identify social-media rumors that the border was open as a contributing factor, but do not establish that a single person told the migrants to swim or that this alone caused the drownings; the crossings also involved a stampede, dangerous conditions and other misinformation.

    Sources

  180. Claim 180
    Unverifiable82% confidence▶ 1:25:54
    “It's Muhammad the 6th. It's his government. His police look away. His influencers made the videos.”

    Morocco's king and government deliberately allowed the crossing, with police looking away and influencers creating the videos that prompted it.

    Reporting confirms that social-media videos and apparent failures of Moroccan border control were relevant to the mass crossing, and one expert suggested Moroccan complicity was likely. But the specific allegations that the king ordered it, police intentionally looked away, and Moroccan influencers produced the videos have not been established by reliable evidence.

    Sources

  181. Claim 181
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:26:04
    “And they're also Madrid and Brussels because they know who this man is. And they keep sending money and kissing his hand.”

    Madrid and Brussels knew what Morocco's king was doing but continued sending him money and engaging diplomatically with him.

    The underlying existence of EU-Spain financial and diplomatic cooperation with Morocco is documented. The claim becomes misleading by linking that cooperation to asserted knowledge of a specific royal operation that reporting has not established.

    Omits: Spain and the EU do provide Morocco with funding and cooperate with its authorities on migration, but the transcript supplies no evidence that Madrid or Brussels knew the king had ordered this specific crisis or that the payments constituted approval of the alleged conduct.

    Sources

  182. Claim 182
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 1:26:26
    “has maybe you know this a national holiday celebrating the green march the day they pushed 350,000 civilian over a border and took or sahara the Sahara”

    Morocco has a national holiday commemorating the Green March, a 1975 march of about 350,000 civilians into Western Sahara.

    Morocco officially observes November 6 as the anniversary of the Green March, and sources commonly give the participation figure as about 350,000. However, the wording creates a misleading impression that the march straightforwardly transferred sovereign ownership of Western Sahara, whose status remains disputed.

    Omits: The Green March was a 1975 mass demonstration into Spanish-controlled Western Sahara; describing it simply as civilians crossing a border and 'taking' the territory omits that Western Sahara remains disputed and that the march did not legally establish Moroccan sovereignty.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  183. Claim 183
    Accurate99% confidence▶ 1:26:36
    “in 2021 they did in theta and the European parliament condemned them for using migrants even children as pressure”

    The European Parliament condemned Morocco in 2021 for using migrants, including minors, to exert political pressure during the Ceuta crisis.

    The European Parliament adopted a resolution on June 10, 2021, concerning the use of minors by Moroccan authorities in the Ceuta migration crisis. Contemporary analysis summarizes the resolution as condemning the use of migrants, particularly unaccompanied minors, as political pressure on Spain.

    Sources

  184. Claim 184
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:26:46
    “they did it again five times bigger and this week our war detected Moran intelligence agents inside the cross and gender moving people in trucks 60,000 people in today's pier”

    Around 60,000 people recently crossed from Morocco into Ceuta.

    The transcript appears to assert that intelligence agents were identified among the migrants and that people were transported in trucks, but the available evidence does not provide a reliable, independently verifiable source confirming both allegations. The relevant terms and purported detection are not sufficiently documented to judge the claim.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  185. Claim 185
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:26:46
    “they did it again five times bigger and this week our war detected Moran intelligence agents inside the cross and gender moving people in trucks”

    Morocco deliberately repeated the 2021 migration tactic on a scale five times larger, using intelligence agents and trucks to move people.

    The claim combines several distinct assertions that are not adequately established: deliberate Moroccan state direction, a comparison that is exactly “five times” larger than 2021, intelligence agents inside the crossing, and truck-based movement. Reporting confirms a roughly 60,000-person surge but describes online rumors and packed buses, trains, and taxis, while noting that alleged Moroccan complicity lacked publicly offered evidence.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  186. Claim 186
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:30:08
    “SP Spain is is receiving less people from from their borders than than Italy, like half of it.”

    Spain was receiving fewer migrants at its borders than Italy, at roughly half Italy’s number.

    No time period, border category, or measurement is specified. Available official and research data vary by year and by whether the comparison concerns sea arrivals, all irregular entries, asylum applicants, or detected crossings, so the quantitative claim cannot be judged as stated.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  187. Claim 187
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 1:30:21
    “And that's the the the the deportations are are bigger in Spain than in Italy.”

    Spain carried out more deportations or returns of migrants than Italy.

    The claim gives no year, definition of deportation, or source population. Return statistics differ depending on whether they count forced returns, voluntary departures, orders to leave, or all third-country nationals, so the comparison is not well-posed.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

    • 1Migration Key

      BackgroundCountry Italy | Orders to leave 26 035 | Returns 4 520 | Return rate (%) 17.4% ... Country Spain | Orders to leave 44 065 | Returns 4 275 | Return rate (%) 9.7%

    • 2Migration and asylum in Europe – 2024 edition

      BackgroundAmong the EU countries, France issued the most return decisions (138 000 or 28% of all orders to leave issued in the EU), followed by Spain (64 000 or 13%) and Germany (45 000 or 9%).

  188. Claim 188
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 1:31:54
    “Miguel 2021 European parliament 397 votes Morocco condemned for using immigrants including children has political pressure”

    The European Parliament adopted a 2021 resolution condemning Morocco for using migrants, including children, as political pressure, with 397 votes in favor.

    The European Parliament adopted the resolution on June 10, 2021, by 397 votes in favor. The resolution criticized Morocco for using border control and migration, especially unaccompanied minors, as political pressure against an EU member state.

    Sources

  189. Claim 189
    False50% confidence▶ 1:32:04
    “the socialist vote just two”

    The Socialist group’s support for the 2021 European Parliament resolution amounted to only two votes.

    Contemporary reporting states that the resolution was agreed by the main center-right, socialist, liberal, and green groups. That contradicts the assertion that only two Socialist votes supported it.

    Sources