claimpit
← All receipts
Fact-Checker/Videos
Video fact-check

‘What Happened in Gaza Is COMING to the West Bank,’ Experts Warn

85 claims checked · Published August 2026 · Checked August 2026

Watch on YouTube Jump to claims ↓
The map

Who said what, and about what

Hover a row to trace its chain · click one to pin its detail

The receipts

Every claim, checked

  1. Claim 1
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate98% confidence▶ 0:08
    “settlers on attacking mosques, homes, children,”

    Israeli settlers have attacked mosques, homes, and children in the occupied West Bank.

    UN reporting documents Israeli settlers setting fire to a mosque, damaging Palestinian homes, and attacking Palestinians including children. The claim is broadly supported, although the transcript compresses several different incidents into one phrase.

    Sources

  2. Claim 2
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate50% confidence▶ 0:13
    “shooting people dead, shooting American citizens dead.”

    American citizens have been shot dead in the West Bank amid violence involving Israeli forces.

    The Associated Press reports that American-born Tawfic Abdel Jabbar and Mohammad Khdour were killed by Israeli fire in the West Bank, and that Amer Rabee was shot by Israeli forces. The transcript does not specify the perpetrators in this fragment, but its underlying assertion is supported.

    Sources

  3. Claim 3
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedMisleading50% confidence▶ 0:17
    “according to the UN, uh settler violence in the West Bank is at an all-time high.”

    UN data indicate that settler violence in the West Bank is currently at a record level.

    UN OCHA documented October 2025 as the highest monthly total of settler attacks since it began recording such incidents in 2006, and reported that 2026 attacks were averaging about six per day. The broader unqualified phrase “all-time high” overstates what the cited UN data establish.

    Omits: The claim omits that the UN's record designation is generally limited to the period since OCHA began systematic recording in 2006 and often refers to a specific month or metric, rather than establishing that every measure of settler violence is currently at an absolute all-time high.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  4. Claim 4
    Misleading90% confidence▶ 2:04
    “UN's official numbers indicate that they first said 2025 was the worst year in terms of settler terror and now you know 2026 is already surpassing that with about 5 to eight terror attacks from settlers every single day.”

    UN figures show that 2025 was the worst year for settler violence and that 2026 had already surpassed it, with roughly five to eight settler attacks every day.

    UN reporting supports an average of about five settler-related incidents per day in 2025 and about six per day in 2026 through mid-July, with October 2025 reaching about eight per day. But the transcript mislabels the incidents as terror attacks and presents a partial-year rate comparison as though 2026 had already surpassed the completed year overall.

    Omits: The UN figures count incidents involving casualties, property damage or both, not necessarily “terror attacks”; and the 2026 comparison is a year-to-date rate, not proof that the incomplete 2026 calendar year has surpassed the full-year 2025 total.

    Sources

  5. Claim 5
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedAccurate96% confidence▶ 3:19
    “a village that's been tormented by settlers from the the settlement Carmel for years and years.”

    Umm al-Khair has been persistently harassed and sometimes attacked by settlers from the Carmel settlement for years.

    Independent reporting documents persistent harassment and attacks on Umm al-Khair residents by settlers from Carmel. The precise phrase “for years and years” is informal, but the underlying assertion is supported.

    Sources

    • 1Israel’s Apartheid

      SupportsIsraeli settlers from Carmel persistently harass, and sometimes attack, residents of Umm Al-Khair, often while they are in the field with their livestock.

    • 2Humanitarian Situation Update #310 | West Bank

      SupportsSince 2020, OCHA has documented 16 settler-related incidents affecting Umm al Kheir community that resulted in casualties or property damage.

  6. Claim 6
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable91% confidence▶ 3:29
    “this time there not a single day passed that we did not get attacked that there was not a physical assault um and that there was not an attempt to steal more land literally every single day including the day that Congressman Roana visited”

    During the speaker’s visit, Umm al-Khair experienced an attack, physical assault, and an attempt to take more land every single day, including the day Ro Khanna visited.

    UN and human-rights documentation confirms repeated attacks, assaults, land clearing, and property damage in Umm al-Khair, but the available records do not establish that each day of this particular visit included all three events or that one occurred on the day of Khanna’s visit.

    Sources

  7. Claim 7
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 4:08
    “The settlers are in control of the West Bank. The army is taking orders from them”

    Settlers are in control of the West Bank and the army is taking orders from them.

    “In control” and “taking orders” are not defined in the statement. Sources document cooperation, protection, and state impunity for settlers, but they do not establish the literal claim that settlers control the entire West Bank or that the army generally takes orders from them.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  8. Claim 8
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate99% confidence▶ 4:21
    “He said he never felt uh being non-white as he felt being in the West Bank.”

    Ro Khanna said that being in the West Bank was the first time he had been acutely aware of being brown or nonwhite.

    Contemporary reporting quotes Khanna saying that being in the West Bank and Israel was the first time he had been acutely aware of being brown.

    Sources

  9. Claim 9
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 4:47
    “settlers had no problem at all punching me, kicking me, pointing their guns at me, you know, pushing me.”

    Settlers physically assaulted the speaker by punching and kicking him, pointing guns at him, and pushing him.

    Independent coverage confirms that Jasper Nathaniel experienced violent attacks by Israeli settlers, but the available sources do not independently verify each specific act listed here—punching, kicking, pointing guns, and pushing.

    Sources

  10. Claim 10
    Accurate93% confidence▶ 6:23
    “these are not settlers who are acting on their own behalf. This is done part and parcel with the state. it's done with the protection of the army”

    Israeli settlers act with state involvement and protection from the Israeli army.

    Amnesty International documented Israeli authorities providing political, legal and financial backing to settlers, while Israeli forces facilitated or directly participated in attacks. It also documented soldiers accompanying settlers and failing to intervene.

    Sources

  11. Claim 11
    Accurate90% confidence▶ 6:43
    “you have a government that's made it very clear that they intend to take as much land as possible. They want to build as many settlements as possible.”

    The Israeli government has made policies and decisions aimed at expanding settlements and taking control of West Bank land.

    The Israeli government declared more than 1,270 hectares in the West Bank as state land, expanded existing settlements by 5,295 housing units, and established three new settlements in a decision condemned by the G7. Subsequent international reporting also describes accelerated settlement activity and moves toward annexation.

    The intensifiers “as much land as possible” and “as many settlements as possible” are judged as describing an expansive policy direction, not as a literal claim that every available parcel or unlimited number of settlements has been taken or built.

    Sources

    • 1Israeli settlements in the West Bank: G7 joint statement

      SupportsWe also reject the decision by the Government of Israel to declare over 1,270 hectares of land in the West Bank as ‘state lands’ – the largest such declaration of state land since the Oslo Accords – and the decision to expand existing settlements in the occupied West Bank by 5,295 new housing units and to establish 3 new settlements.

    • 22025 Report on Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem

      SupportsThese developments suggest an acceleration of settlement activity and moves towards annexation, as well as a progressive institutionalisation of Israeli civilian governance mechanisms across the oPt, endangering the prospects for a two-state solution.

  12. Claim 12
    False50% confidence▶ 6:58
    “there's complete impunity. These settlers have never been shown a red light.”

    Israeli settlers have never faced meaningful consequences for their violence against Palestinians.

    Accountability is rare, but the universal claim that settlers have never faced consequences is refuted by Ben-Uliel’s conviction and life sentences. More recent reporting likewise describes prosecutions as exceptional rather than nonexistent.

    Sources

  13. Claim 13
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 7:05
    “including an American citizen who was killed just last year, attacked and killed by a settler”

    An American citizen was attacked and killed by an Israeli settler in the previous year.

    AP reported that Sayfollah Musallet of Tampa, Florida, was beaten to death by Israeli settlers in the West Bank in July 2025. This matches the claim that an American citizen was attacked and killed by a settler.

    The relative phrase “just last year” is judged as referring to the year before the interview; the transcript does not provide the interview’s publication date.

    Sources

  14. Claim 14
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 7:14
    “a Palestinian man from the south who was killed by a settler who was sanctioned u by the European Union.”

    A Palestinian man from the southern West Bank was killed by a settler who had been sanctioned by the European Union.

    The person was Awdah Hathaleen, a Palestinian activist from the southern West Bank, who was killed in July 2025. The alleged killer, Yinon Levi, was listed by the EU in April 2024 for violent acts against Palestinians.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  15. Claim 15
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate99% confidence▶ 7:40
    “Oxfam reported in June, and obviously the numbers are already higher now, that across the West Bank, more Palestinians were killed by the Israeli military and settlers in the last three years than in the previous 17 years combined.”

    Oxfam reported that more Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces or settlers across the West Bank in the last three years than in the previous 17 years combined.

    Oxfam’s June 10, 2026 analysis of UN data found 1,244 Palestinians killed by Israeli forces or settlers from 2023 through 2025, compared with 1,036 killed from 2006 through 2022. Thus the last three-year period exceeded the preceding 17-year period.

    The phrase “the numbers are already higher now” is not independently judged because the transcript does not specify the date of the comparison; the Oxfam statistic itself is judged.

    Sources

  16. Claim 16
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate98% confidence▶ 8:00
    “He says the towns and villages of the murderers in Judea and Samaria the West Bank should be treated the same way as Bate Hanoon in Gaza.”

    Itamar Ben-Gvir said West Bank Palestinian towns and villages should be treated like Beit Hanoun in Gaza.

    Ben-Gvir publicly said that West Bank cities and villages where Palestinians carry out attacks should be treated as Beit Hanoun in Gaza was treated. The transcript’s wording is a close paraphrase of the reported statement.

    Sources

  17. Claim 17
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 8:54
    “to name Mahi when we brought experts from Bosnia from from different places where genocides had occurred to the West Bank to assess what the settlers were doing.”

    Experts from Bosnia and other places where genocides occurred were brought to the West Bank to assess settler actions.

    The transcript gives no names, organizations, dates, or report that would allow this specific fact about bringing experts to the West Bank to be independently confirmed. General documentation about settler violence and ethnic cleansing does not establish that this particular expert visit occurred.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  18. Claim 18
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 9:14
    “But when we analyze their movements, they're training to commit ethnic cleansing. So when these settlers go into a village and burn it, the way they come in, they're mixed soldiers and and some civilians, but they're practicing what it would take to for the right when the right moment comes for them to completely wipe out and push out Palestinians outside the West Bank.”

    Settlers are training to commit ethnic cleansing and preparing to remove Palestinians from the West Bank.

    UN and human-rights organizations have documented settler violence, forced displacement, and what some characterize as ethnic cleansing, but the specific assertion that settlers are training for a future operation to completely remove Palestinians is an intent and preparation claim that the cited evidence does not establish.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  19. Claim 19
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedMisleading50% confidence▶ 10:19
    “you documented that Israeli soldiers occupied the home of an American citizen, a doctor from New York um with an American flag on its roof, and the soldiers repeatedly forced him and his family out, pointed M16 at his 61-year-old mother, and then they abruptly picked up and left the home”

    Israeli soldiers expelled an American citizen neurologist and his family from their Turmus Ayya home, pointed weapons at his parents including his 61-year-old mother, and later left the house.

    The Times of Israel reported that New York-based neurologist Hassan Said Shukri said soldiers raided the home, pointed weapons at his parents, and gave them one hour to leave; it also reported that troops later left abruptly. The available account describes a single expulsion rather than repeated removals.

    Omits: Available reporting confirms one forced expulsion of the parents, weapons being pointed at them, and the soldiers’ later departure, but does not support the transcript’s claim that they repeatedly forced the family out.

    The intensifier "repeatedly" was judged literally; the evidence supports an expulsion but not repeated expulsions.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  20. Claim 20
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate97% confidence▶ 10:19
    “this Westbank town that's known for its population of Palestinian-American uh citizens”

    Turmus Ayya is a West Bank town with a predominantly Palestinian-American population.

    Independent reporting describes Turmus Ayya as a Palestinian town whose population is predominantly or overwhelmingly Palestinian American. The transcript’s wording is broadly accurate despite the town name being transcribed phonetically.

    Sources

  21. Claim 21
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedMisleading50% confidence▶ 10:41
    “apparently after pressure from the US embassy”

    The soldiers left the home after pressure from the U.S. embassy.

    The available report says the troops left after media coverage began and does not establish that U.S. Embassy pressure caused the departure. A separate account said the family’s son contacted the embassy and was told it could not intervene.

    Omits: Reporting attributes the soldiers’ departure to the appearance of media reports and says the U.S. Embassy was reported as unable or unwilling to contact the Israeli military.

    Sources

  22. Claim 22
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedAccurate91% confidence▶ 11:12
    “settlers have occupied the olive fields that are directly abuing the village itself. Now uh you know in the last year Palestinians who try to get to their land in the olive fields are are getting attacked and the settlers just keep pushing forward”

    Settlers have taken control of or occupied Palestinian olive-growing land near Turmus Ayya, and Palestinians trying to reach their fields have been attacked.

    Reporting from human-rights organizations and the Associated Press documents settler attacks in Turmus Ayya, restrictions on access to Palestinian farmland, and settler expansion or outpost construction on village land. The claim is supported in substance.

    Sources

  23. Claim 23
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 11:25
    “are routinely sort of marching through the village with machine guns very clearly again trying to you know terrorize the Palestinians there into leaving”

    Settlers routinely march through the village with machine guns to terrorize Palestinians into leaving.

    Reliable sources document repeated armed settler attacks, intimidation, and displacement pressure in and around Turmus Ayya, but the specific claim that settlers routinely march through the village with machine guns and do so with the stated intent of forcing residents to leave was not independently confirmed.

    Sources

  24. Claim 24
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 11:48
    “the US embassy has done absolutely nothing to get the”

    The U.S. Embassy did absolutely nothing to get the soldiers out of the house.

    An account attributed to the family says the embassy told them it could do nothing and refused to contact the Israeli military, while other reporting links the soldiers’ departure to media attention. That supports a reported failure to secure the release but does not prove the universal claim that the embassy did absolutely nothing.

    The intensifier "absolutely nothing" was judged literally; the available evidence establishes an alleged refusal to intervene but not every action the embassy may have taken.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  25. Claim 25
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedMisleading84% confidence▶ 12:45
    “the government and the military and the settlers have gotten together and mapped out the territory and decided this is a strategic place to build an outpost because we will cut off roads from this Palestinian village to the next and we'll force the Palestinians into this small village.”

    Israeli government and military officials, together with settlers, have coordinated a strategic effort involving outposts, roads, and the encirclement or displacement of Palestinian communities.

    UN and Human Rights Watch reporting supports coordinated state measures, outpost expansion, road access restrictions, and efforts that can encircle or displace Palestinian communities. However, the transcript presents this as a comprehensive explanation for the locations and non-random nature of the attacks, which the cited evidence does not establish for every incident.

    Omits: The claim omits the important distinction between documented government-backed settlement expansion, road restrictions, and strategic encirclement on one hand, and proof that every cited settler attack was centrally planned through one joint map by the government, military, and settlers on the other.

    Sources

    • 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry

      SupportsSettlers from farm outposts and Israeli government officials have explicitly stated that they are working to create a strategic configuration which completely encircles Palestinian communities and forces Palestinians to leave.

    • 2West Bank: Israel Responsible for Rising Settler Violence

      SupportsThe evidence shows that armed settlers, with the active participation of army units, repeatedly cut off road access and raided Palestinian communities, detained, assaulted, and tortured residents, chased them out of their homes and off their lands at gunpoint or coerced them to leave with death threats, and blocked them from taking their belongings.

    • 3OHCHR Report on Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory

      SupportsDuring the reporting period, the Government of Israel took concerted measures to consolidate its annexation of large parts of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, through the authorization and expansion of settlements, outposts and associated infrastructure.

  26. Claim 26
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate99% confidence▶ 13:23
    “American teenagers have been shot and killed there.”

    Two or more American teenagers have been shot and killed in the West Bank.

    At least two Palestinian-American teenagers, Tawfic Abdel Jabbar and Mohammad Ahmad Alkhdour, were shot and killed in separate West Bank incidents in early 2024. Later reporting also documented the 2025 killing of 14-year-old Palestinian-American Amir Rabee.

    Sources

  27. Claim 27
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate99% confidence▶ 13:25
    “American citizens have been roughed up and detained, held in custody”

    American citizens have been assaulted and detained in the West Bank.

    Documented examples include the 2014 beating and arrest of 15-year-old U.S. citizen Tariq Abu Khdeir by Israeli police and the 2025 detention of Palestinian-American teenager Mohammed Ibrahim in Israeli military custody.

    Sources

  28. Claim 28
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedAccurate50% confidence▶ 14:11
    “Rachel Corey, of course, was killed over 20 years ago, um, an American citizen”

    Rachel Corrie was an American citizen who was killed by an Israeli military bulldozer more than twenty years ago.

    Rachel Corrie, a 23-year-old American activist, was killed in Rafah on March 16, 2003, after being struck by an Israeli military bulldozer. As of August 10, 2026, that was more than 23 years ago.

    Sources

  29. Claim 29
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedMisleading50% confidence▶ 14:23
    “despite the fact that they know exactly who killed her with a bulldozer.”

    The responsible person in Rachel Corrie’s death is definitively known, because she was killed by a bulldozer.

    It is established that Corrie was fatally struck by an Israeli military bulldozer, but the identity of the legally responsible killer and whether the operator acted intentionally were not resolved in the speaker’s asserted sense. An Israeli court rejected the family’s liability claim, while major rights organizations criticized the investigation and its conclusions.

    Omits: The statement leaves out that Israeli military investigators and courts concluded the death was accidental and rejected state liability, while Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and eyewitnesses disputed the adequacy of that investigation and alleged the driver should have seen her.

    Sources

  30. Claim 30
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedFalse99% confidence▶ 14:57
    “Sharina Buaklay, American journalist, was killed on Joe Biden's watch.”

    An American journalist named Sharina Buaklay was killed during Joe Biden’s presidency.

    Reliable sources identify the journalist as Shireen Abu Akleh, not “Sharina Buaklay.” The underlying timing is correct, but the specific identity stated is false.

    Sources

  31. Claim 31
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 15:03
    “We here at Zateo did a documentary which exposed the killer,”

    A Zeteo documentary exposed the identity of the person who killed Shireen Abu Akleh.

    Zeteo’s film identified an Israeli soldier as the alleged killer, but independent reporting describes this as the documentary’s claim, while the IDF said it could not unequivocally determine the source of the fatal gunfire. The stronger assertion that the film definitively exposed the killer is not established.

    Sources

  32. Claim 32
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 15:06
    “something that the Biden administration could have done but chose uh not to do.”

    The Biden administration could have identified Abu Akleh’s killer but chose not to do so.

    The record shows that the Biden administration conducted or received assessments and that an FBI investigation was opened, while critics alleged inadequate accountability. But the counterfactual claim that officials could have identified the killer and deliberately chose not to is not demonstrable from the available evidence.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  33. Claim 33
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate99% confidence▶ 15:31
    “Brett Stevens in the New York Times are writing columns as he did condemning quote unquote Jewish terrorists,”

    New York Times columnist Bret Stephens wrote a column condemning what he called “Jewish terrorists.”

    The name is misspelled in the transcript, but the substantive claim is accurate: Bret Stephens wrote about settler violence and referred to perpetrators as “Jewish terrorists.”

    Sources

  34. Claim 34
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedMisleading50% confidence▶ 15:49
    “the way in which settlers are very inextricably linked to the government? They are not a separate fringe outlier. They are not operating solo.”

    Israeli settlers are inextricably linked to the Israeli government and are not a separate fringe group acting independently.

    UN reporting documents cases in which Israeli security forces acquiesced in, supported, or participated in settler violence and describes convergence between government policy and settler violence. It does not establish that all settlers are government-linked or that no settlers operate independently.

    Omits: The statement generalizes from violent settler groups and documented government or security-force support to settlers as a whole, without distinguishing between all settlers and those involved in attacks or annexation efforts.

    The intensifiers “very inextricably,” “not a separate fringe outlier,” and “not operating solo” were judged literally; the evidence supports substantial state support or acquiescence for some settler violence, not an undifferentiated claim about every settler.

    Sources

  35. Claim 35
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedMisleading86% confidence▶ 16:13
    “And it was created in the exact same way. these same types of gangs com terrorized Palestinians from village to village um setting places on fire committing massacres and all of that is documented”

    Israel was created in exactly the same way as current settler violence, through gangs terrorizing Palestinians, burning places, and committing massacres.

    Historical sources document Zionist attacks, atrocities, and the use of violence that contributed to Palestinian flight, including after Deir Yassin. However, they also describe a complex war involving multiple actors and causes, so the claim of an exact equivalence is misleading.

    Omits: The statement omits that the 1947–49 displacement occurred amid a multidirectional civil and interstate war involving different forces and causes; historical accounts distinguish direct expulsions, fear of attack, combat, and other factors rather than treating the process as identical to present-day settler violence.

    The intensifier “exact same way” was judged literally; evidence documents Zionist attacks and atrocities but does not establish an identical political or military process.

    Sources

  36. Claim 36
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedMisleading91% confidence▶ 17:10
    “People 750,000 people don't just up and leave one day. They're terrorized out of their homes and that's what they did in 1948”

    The 750,000 Palestinians displaced in 1948 were terrorized out of their homes rather than leaving for other reasons connected to the war.

    Approximately 700,000–750,000 Palestinians were displaced in the 1947–49 war, and Zionist attacks, atrocities, and fear played major roles. But the blanket assertion that all were terrorized out of their homes oversimplifies the documented mix of flight, expulsion, and wartime displacement.

    Omits: The claim leaves out that historians describe a mixture of direct expulsions, flight from fear of combat and attack, and other wartime causes; one historical account says about a quarter-million fled mainly out of fear of being caught up in battle, while major expulsions also occurred.

    The intensifier “they’re terrorized out” was judged as applying to all 750,000 people; the evidence supports terror and coercion as important causes but not a single cause for every displaced person.

    Sources

  37. Claim 37
    Attributed toFadi QuranAuto-approvedUnverifiable96% confidence▶ 18:10
    “I've had five of my friends injured, teenagers being shot at by settlers as the soldiers watched”

    The speaker had five friends injured when teenagers were shot at by settlers while soldiers watched.

    This is a specific personal account, but the transcript provides no names, date, location, or other details that would allow independent verification. The available reporting documents settler violence and alleged military inaction generally, but does not verify this particular anecdote.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.

  38. Claim 38
    Attributed toFadi QuranAuto-approvedUnverifiable94% confidence▶ 18:31
    “they then took four young men out of the car. They blindfolded them. They handcuffed them. And then settlers came out from nearby from the near the checkpoint and just started beating up uh these young men on the street.”

    Soldiers detained four young Palestinian men, blindfolded and handcuffed them, and settlers then beat them near a checkpoint.

    The account is potentially checkable, but no date, checkpoint, identities, or other identifying details are supplied, and the search did not locate an independent source confirming this exact incident. Related reports document other cases of Palestinians being blindfolded, handcuffed, or assaulted, but they do not establish that this particular event occurred.

    Sources

  39. Claim 39
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 19:37
    “The Israeli military is now infiltrated by lots of settlers, including at the highest ranks.”

    The Israeli military is infiltrated by many settlers, including at the highest ranks.

    Sources document that some settlers serve in Israeli military units and that at least one West Bank unit was composed of local settlers, but they do not establish the undefined quantity "lots" or prove that settlers occupy the highest military ranks.

    The intensifiers "lots" and "at the highest ranks" were judged as stated; the narrower claim that settlers serve in the Israeli military is supported, but the transcript does not define or substantiate the scale or rank distribution.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  40. Claim 40
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate99% confidence▶ 19:42
    “We have a settler as an ambassador to the United States of America right now is an Israeli settler.”

    Israel currently has an Israeli settler serving as its ambassador to the United States.

    Yechiel Leiter is Israel’s current ambassador to the United States, having assumed the role in January 2025. Independent reporting describes him as active in the West Bank settlement movement and reported to live in a West Bank settlement.

    Sources

  41. Claim 41
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedFalse98% confidence▶ 20:16
    “the first of all the fighters uh you know in the West Bank have basically been all killed or arrested by Israel.”

    Nearly all armed-resistance fighters in the West Bank had been killed or arrested by Israel.

    UNRWA reported in February 2025 that Palestinian armed groups were increasingly active in the northern West Bank and engaged in violent clashes. That is a direct counterexample to the claim that West Bank fighters had basically all been killed or arrested.

    Sources

  42. Claim 42
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedAccurate96% confidence▶ 20:28
    “the hot beds of armed resistance in the the refugee camps in the north have been emptied.”

    The northern West Bank refugee camps that were centers of armed resistance had been emptied by Israeli operations.

    In the context of the 2025 Israeli operation, UN reporting stated that the three northern West Bank refugee camps were emptied and that residents would not be allowed to return. The statement is supported when "emptied" refers to the forced displacement of camp residents, not the elimination of all armed activity.

    Sources

  43. Claim 43
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedFalse99% confidence▶ 20:37
    “the Palestinian Authority who are the only Palestinians that really have guns in the West Bank”

    The Palestinian Authority is essentially the only Palestinian actor in the West Bank that has guns.

    UNRWA explicitly reported that Palestinian armed groups in the northern West Bank were deploying improvised explosive devices and fighting both Israeli and Palestinian forces. This directly contradicts the claim that only the Palestinian Authority had guns there.

    Sources

  44. Claim 44
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate100% confidence▶ 21:37
    “just over a year ago, uh no other land won the Oscar.”

    The documentary No Other Land won the Oscar for Documentary Feature Film.

    The Academy’s official 2025 ceremony page lists No Other Land as the winner of Documentary Feature Film. The film also documented Israeli settler violence and displacement in the West Bank.

    Sources

  45. Claim 45
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate93% confidence▶ 21:53
    “Journalists like yourself, Jasper, are able to go there in a way you can't go to Gaza.”

    Journalists have been able to access the West Bank while foreign journalists have been barred from independently entering Gaza.

    Press-freedom organizations have documented that foreign journalists can report from the West Bank, while Israeli authorities have barred foreign journalists from independently entering Gaza. West Bank access is not necessarily unrestricted, but the stated contrast is accurate.

    The intensifier "in a way" is judged as referring to independent foreign-press access, not unrestricted access to every part of the West Bank.

    Sources

  46. Claim 46
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate50% confidence▶ 22:20
    “what Israel did in 1948 in order to create a state means”

    The State of Israel was established in 1948.

    Israel’s declaration of independence proclaimed the establishment of the State of Israel on May 14, 1948. The transcript’s wording also implies a causal purpose, which is consistent with the declaration’s stated act of establishing a state.

    Sources

  47. Claim 47
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate90% confidence▶ 22:33
    “these are people who are funded and supported by the state. They're actually being given funds.”

    Israeli settlers and settlements receive funding and support from the Israeli state.

    UN reporting has documented Israeli government and government-controlled entities funding settlements, as well as coordination and support involving settlers and the state. The claim is broad but its substantive assertion is supported.

    Sources

  48. Claim 48
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedMisleading50% confidence▶ 23:04
    “one of the activists from No Other Land was actually killed last year on the 28th of July by an by an Israeli settler who Yunan Levy”

    A No Other Land activist, Awdah Hathaleen, was killed on July 28, 2025 by Israeli settler Yinon Levi.

    The core account is supported: Awdah Hathaleen was fatally shot on July 28, 2025, and Yinon Levi was identified as the settler accused in the killing and was on an EU sanctions list. However, Hathaleen was described as a consultant or activist involved in the film, not one of its credited producers.

    Omits: Awdah Hathaleen was a Palestinian activist and consultant involved in No Other Land, not a credited producer; the speaker also mispronounced or misspelled the settler's name as Yunan Levy rather than Yinon Levi.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  49. Claim 49
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate50% confidence▶ 23:15
    “Yunan Levy who was sanctioned as I mentioned by the European Union.”

    Yinon Levi was sanctioned by the European Union.

    The Council of the European Union listed Yinon Levi under its human-rights sanctions regime in April 2024 for involvement in violent acts against neighboring Palestinian villages.

    Sources

  50. Claim 50
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedFalse98% confidence▶ 23:20
    “He to this day still remains outside of prison. He's not been charged with anything even though”

    At the time described, Yinon Levi remained out of prison and had not been charged.

    Israeli prosecutors filed an indictment against Levi in August 2026. Although he was not in custody, the statement that he had not been charged is no longer correct.

    The phrase "to this day" is judged against the current date, August 10, 2026. It may have been accurate when the video was recorded, but it is false as a present-tense claim now.

    Sources

  51. Claim 51
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate98% confidence▶ 23:24
    “even though um he even though his death was captured by him. He actually documented his own killing.”

    Awdah Hathaleen filmed the shooting that killed him.

    Video reported by The Guardian and AP was filmed by Hathaleen and shows Levi firing toward the person holding the camera. The footage and accompanying reporting support the claim that Hathaleen documented the shooting himself.

    Sources

  52. Claim 52
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 23:49
    “literally taken over the the farm of one man or his brother made sure that he that he can't reach his barn. So his animals get fed once every 3 days.”

    The Israeli army blocked a Palestinian farmer from reaching his barn, so his animals could be fed only about once every three days.

    A report on the same Umm al-Khair case says the military order prevented the family from accessing its sheep pen except when soldiers were present, every three to four days. The IDF disputed the extent of the restriction but acknowledged the closure and said the family retained livestock access.

    Sources

  53. Claim 53
    Accurate50% confidence▶ 24:05
    “they've also taken over his bathroom. So he and his family can't even access their bathroom.”

    The Palestinian family was prevented from accessing its bathroom.

    The Times of Israel, citing AFP and local residents, reported that an Israeli military order blocked a family in Umm al-Khair from reaching its outhouse for three weeks and that the family instead used bathrooms elsewhere.

    Sources

  54. Claim 54
    Accurate98% confidence▶ 24:14
    “Why? because all of this has been declared to be a closed military zone.”

    The area around the family’s bathroom and livestock pen was declared a closed military zone.

    The IDF told AFP that it had declared the area a closed military zone in order to disperse the parties involved. The military characterized the closure as temporary.

    Sources

  55. Claim 55
    Unverifiable78% confidence▶ 24:22
    “these settlers in addition to doing that have been daily sexually harassing the women that are in the town, exposing themselves and so on.”

    Settlers sexually harassed women in the town daily, including by exposing themselves.

    Reliable reports document sexual harassment, indecent exposure, and other sexualized violence by Israeli soldiers and settlers in the West Bank, but the sources located do not establish this exact allegation—daily exposure of women in this particular town.

    Sources

  56. Claim 56
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 24:39
    “a film that won the Oscar. One of the producers gets killed.”

    A producer of an Oscar-winning film was killed.

    The reported victim, Awdah Hathaleen, was a community activist involved in No Other Land. The available reporting identifies him as an activist and community leader, not a producer of the film.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  57. Claim 57
    Accurate93% confidence▶ 24:46
    “He documents his own killing. And we know who does the killing and still the killer runs is at large.”

    The victim recorded footage documenting his own killing, the suspected killer is known, and he remains at large.

    AP reported that footage apparently taken by Hathaleen showed the shooter firing toward the camera, and that Israeli prosecutors accused Yinon Levi of the killing. AP also reported that Levi was not under arrest and had been seen roaming near the village.

    Sources

  58. Claim 58
    Misleading86% confidence▶ 24:58
    “the settlers keep getting um rewarded with more and more land for continuing to terrorize Palestinians.”

    Settlers are rewarded with more land for continuing to terrorize Palestinians.

    Israeli and international monitoring organizations have documented government support for settler outposts, land allocation and expansion alongside violence that displaces Palestinians. However, the stronger claim that settlers receive additional land specifically as a reward for continuing to terrorize Palestinians is not directly established.

    Omits: The evidence documents state-backed land allocations, grants, outpost expansion and settler violence, but does not establish that land is formally awarded specifically as a reward for each act of terror or that the causal mechanism is universal.

    Sources

    • 1The Bad Samaritan: Land Grabbing by Settlers Through Grazing

      SupportsKerem Navot and Peace Now have published a joint report revealing how a small group of violent settlers, with support from the Israeli government, have taken control of 14% of the West Bank by establishing over 100 shepherding outposts, effectively driving out the Palestinians from these areas.

    • 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities

      SupportsWith full political, legal and financial state backing, under Israel’s 37th government, settlers have intensified existing practices and adopted more aggressive tactics to displace Palestinians and seize their land.

  59. Claim 59
    Misleading84% confidence▶ 26:21
    “a disproportionate amount of their tax money is going directly into funding these violent settlers, into paying for their guns, into paying for their infrastructure.”

    A disproportionate amount of Israeli taxpayers’ money directly funds violent settlers, including their guns and infrastructure.

    Evidence supports substantial Israeli government financial and material support for settler organizations and unauthorized outposts, including grants and equipment. It does not establish the undefined qualifier “disproportionate” or prove the broader claim that public money directly paid for the weapons of violent settlers.

    Omits: The claim provides no quantified comparison establishing that the amount is disproportionate, and the available evidence documents government grants, equipment and infrastructure support for settler organizations or outposts rather than proving that taxpayers’ money directly paid for the guns used by particular violent settlers.

    Sources

    • 1The Bad Samaritan: Land Grabbing by Settlers Through Grazing

      Supports“Business Entrepreneurship” Grants by the Settlement Division: Shepherding outpost owners have received roughly NIS 1.6 million in business development grants, alongside loans of undisclosed amounts.

    • 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities

      SupportsBetween April and July 2025, the government transferred at least 48 all-terrain vehicles (ATVs) to unauthorized outposts along with night vision goggles, drones, communications equipment and generators among other things, during ceremonies held at both a settlement and an outpost, attended by ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Orit Strock.

  60. Claim 60
    Misleading93% confidence▶ 26:51
    “The settlements are ultimately what are preventing the uh Palestinians east of the green line in the West Bank in Jordan and wherever else from coming in and attacking Israel like happened uh in Hamas on October 7th.”

    The settlements prevent Palestinians in or around the West Bank and elsewhere from entering Israel and carrying out attacks like Hamas's October 7 attack.

    The claim is misleading because it attributes a preventive security function to settlements without evidence establishing that causation, while the specific comparison is to an attack launched from Gaza rather than the West Bank. A major public poll found 40% of Israelis said settlements help security, 35% said they hurt, and 21% said they make no difference.

    Omits: The October 7, 2023 attack was launched from the Gaza Strip by Gaza-based militants, and available polling shows Israelis are divided—not in consensus—over whether West Bank settlements improve security. The claim also presents a causal security effect that the cited evidence does not establish.

    Sources

  61. Claim 61
    Attributed toFadi QuranAuto-approvedUnverifiable98% confidence▶ 27:44
    “Israel is the homeland the nation state of settler terrorism.”

    Israel is the nation-state or homeland of “settler terrorism.”

    “Settler terrorism” is not an agreed operational or legal category that can be applied to determine whether Israel is its “nation-state” or “homeland.” International bodies have assessed the legality of Israeli settlements and occupation, but that does not verify this broader definitional characterization.

    Sources

    • 1Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024

      BackgroundThus, as early as September 1967, the legal adviser to the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and later various United Nations bodies and institutions warned Israel of the unlawful nature of settlement and other related practices.

  62. Claim 62
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 28:12
    “the polls show not only do the majority of Israelis know they support it you know and they practice settler violence in different ways.”

    Polls show that a majority of Israelis support settler violence and that Israelis practice it in various ways.

    The claim does not identify the poll, define what “it” refers to, or specify what conduct counts as an Israeli “practice” of settler violence. Available polling shows divided views about settlements and concern about violence, but it does not establish the broad majority claim as worded.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second False. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  63. Claim 63
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 28:25
    “It's joining an army that commits genocide.”

    The Israeli army commits genocide.

    This is a live legal and institutional dispute. The UN Commission of Inquiry has concluded that Israel committed genocide in Gaza, while Israel rejects that conclusion; the ICJ proceedings cited here were still pending and its provisional-measures order was not a final finding that genocide had occurred.

    The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.

    Sources

  64. Claim 64
    Misleading86% confidence▶ 30:00
    “And these settlements are based on stolen Palestinian land.”

    The West Bank settlements are based on stolen Palestinian land.

    International sources document confiscation and requisitioning of Palestinian land for settlement expansion, but the blanket wording implies that all settlement land was stolen from private Palestinian owners. The available evidence supports a narrower claim about extensive confiscation, requisitioning and appropriation of land.

    Omits: The claim omits that settlement areas have had different land classifications and histories; although the ICJ found that settlement expansion is based on the confiscation or requisitioning of large areas of land, it did not establish that every settlement parcel was privately owned Palestinian land unlawfully stolen.

    Sources

  65. Claim 65
    Accurate91% confidence▶ 30:24
    “We're seeing it in South Africa now even though it's taken some years where communities that were stolen and taken by the apartheid regime now are going back to their original owners.”

    Some communities dispossessed under apartheid in South Africa have had land returned through restitution processes.

    South Africa’s restitution program has returned land to people and communities dispossessed through racially discriminatory laws and practices, including apartheid-era dispossession. The wording “original owners” is simplified, since restitution can involve communities, claimants, or compensation, but the substantive assertion is supported.

    Sources

    • 1Land reform

      SupportsA person or community dispossessed of property after 19 June 1913 as a result of past racially discriminatory laws or practices is entitled, to the extent provided by an Act of Parliament, either to restitution of that property, or to equitable redress.

    • 2Dispossessed family receives 627 hectares of land back

      SupportsThe government has returned more than 627 hectares of land in Mpumalanga to its rightful custodians after it was appropriated under the apartheid regime around 1934, reaffirming its commitment to land restitution.

  66. Claim 66
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable82% confidence▶ 31:13
    “the settlers are less likely to use, I think, lethal force if there is an international person there sticking a camera in their face.”

    Settlers are less likely to use lethal force when an international person is present and recording them.

    Protective-presence groups and international monitors are documented in West Bank communities, but the sources located do not provide reliable comparative data showing that the presence of an international person reduces settlers’ likelihood of using lethal force. The claim is a causal empirical assertion that remains unconfirmed here.

    Sources

  67. Claim 67
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedAccurate94% confidence▶ 31:23
    “yes, the violence has gotten worse. Um, yes, the attacks are more violent and more widespread”

    Settler violence in the West Bank has become worse, more violent and more widespread.

    UN and conflict-monitoring sources report a sharp increase in settler violence in recent years, including escalation after October 7, 2023 and more documented incidents involving casualties or property damage. The transcript does not specify a comparison period, but the general recent-trend claim is supported.

    Sources

  68. Claim 68
    Attributed toFadi QuranAuto-approvedMisleading91% confidence▶ 32:11
    “36,000 Palestinians have been displaced and and ethnically cleansed from their homes across the West Bank in the last few years.”

    More than 36,000 Palestinians have been displaced and ethnically cleansed from their homes across the West Bank in the last few years.

    A March 2026 UN Human Rights Office report did document more than 36,000 displaced Palestinians in the West Bank during the relevant reporting period. However, the report distinguished the causes of displacement and said the scale raised concerns of ethnic cleansing, so presenting the entire figure as definitively “ethnically cleansed” overstates the finding.

    Omits: The claim omits that the UN’s reported total included an estimated 32,000 people displaced by Israeli security operations and about 1,600 displaced by settler violence; the UN described this as mass forcible transfer that raised concerns of ethnic cleansing, rather than definitively finding that all 36,000 had been ethnically cleansed.

    Sources

  69. Claim 69
    Attributed toFadi QuranAuto-approvedUnverifiable78% confidence▶ 32:29
    “in communities that have had that, although they face settler attacks, they haven't been ethnically cleansed. Those communities are still standing.”

    Communities with sustained international presence have not been ethnically cleansed and remain standing.

    The claim does not identify which communities qualify as having sustained international presence, and “ethnically cleansed” has no universally agreed operational threshold for this comparison. Available sources document both protective-presence activity and continuing displacement threats, but do not establish the asserted universal comparison.

    Sources

    • 1Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities

      BackgroundIn addition, Amnesty International conducted in-person and phone interviews with 10 foreign and Israeli protective presence volunteers, who seek to protect Palestinians in Area C through their presence and monitoring.

    • 2OHCHR: Settler violence drives forced displacement in the West Bank

      BackgroundSuch settler-driven displacement, particularly in Bedouin and herding communities, usually follows the same pattern: an illegal outpost is erected near or inside a herding community, settlers restrict Palestinians’ access to water and grazing space, settlers repeatedly attack communities, destroy property, infrastructure and livestock, and injure or kill residents.

  70. Claim 70
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate86% confidence▶ 32:45
    “collective has documented in their report, The Predatory State, the consistency of Israeli uh military and settler sexual violence as a deliberate means of ethnic cleansing.”

    The Palestinian Feminist Collective's report documents Israeli military and settler sexual violence as a systemic mechanism connected to displacement and settler-colonial rule.

    The report states that Israel’s systematic sexualized and gendered violence is a historical mechanism of settler-colonial rule and that sexual violence has been used as a method of displacement and domination. The speaker’s attribution to the report is accurate, although the report’s wording is broader than the specific phrase “ethnic cleansing.”

    Sources

  71. Claim 71
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate98% confidence▶ 33:03
    “there's been another one that was done by the Norwegian Refugee Council in which they document how um sexual violence has been used.”

    The Norwegian Refugee Council has published a report documenting sexualized and gender-based violence by Israeli settlers and soldiers against Palestinians in the West Bank.

    The Norwegian Refugee Council published “Sexual violence and forcible transfer in the West Bank,” documenting sexualized violence attributed to Israeli settlers and soldiers against Palestinians.

    Sources

    • 1Sexual violence and forcible transfer in the West Bank

      SupportsThis report documents gender-based and sexualised violence perpetrated by Israeli settlers against Palestinians in Area C of the West Bank in contexts where Israeli forces were present and did not prevent or halt the violence, nor effectively investigate the abuses.

  72. Claim 72
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate90% confidence▶ 33:15
    “Everything from sexual harassment to um to to rape to um to sexual assault, you name it, to try to get people out of their homes.”

    The cited report documents forms of sexualized violence including harassment, assault, humiliation and rape, and connects them to pressure on Palestinian communities to leave their homes.

    The NRC report documents sexualized harassment, intimidation, humiliation and conflict-related sexual violence, and says such violence is used to pressure communities and shape decisions about remaining or leaving their homes and land.

    Sources

  73. Claim 73
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 33:33
    “these settlers have been attacking um those communities where where they find that men are leaving to go to work.”

    Israeli settlers specifically target communities where men leave to work.

    The available NRC materials document attacks on Palestinian communities and gendered patterns of exposure, but the cited sources do not establish the specific targeting pattern described here—communities selected because men leave to work. The claim therefore cannot be confirmed as stated.

    Sources

  74. Claim 74
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate50% confidence▶ 33:51
    “sexual violence ranks among the top reasons”

    Sexualized violence was among the leading reasons displaced Palestinian households gave for leaving their communities.

    The NRC-linked West Bank Protection Consortium report found that more than 70 percent of displaced households interviewed identified threats against women and children, particularly sexualized violence, as the decisive factor in their decision to flee.

    Sources

  75. Claim 75
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 34:50
    “because it has close to 100,000 police and and security personnel”

    The Palestinian Authority has close to 100,000 police and security personnel.

    Available estimates vary by date and by whether Gaza personnel and inactive or broader security-sector employees are included. A World Bank assessment put the Palestinian Authority’s security-sector total at about 65,000, so presenting the figure as simply “close to 100,000” without scope or date creates a misleading impression.

    Omits: The statement does not specify a date or clarify which institutions and territories are included; a World Bank assessment counted approximately 65,000 Palestinian security-sector personnel, substantially below 100,000.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  76. Claim 76
    Misleading50% confidence▶ 35:56
    “When Mandani was in the New York State Assembly, he pushed the bill not on our dime to investigate tax exempt groups in the US funding settlements.”

    Mamdani introduced the Not on Our Dime bill in the New York State Assembly, but the bill was designed to prohibit certain nonprofit support for Israeli settlement activity rather than simply investigate tax-exempt groups.

    Mamdani was listed as a sponsor of New York's Not on Our Dime legislation, but the bill's official summary describes prohibiting nonprofit support for Israeli settlement activity and allowing civil enforcement, not simply investigating tax-exempt groups.

    Omits: The bill's stated purpose was to prohibit not-for-profit corporations from engaging in unauthorized support of Israeli settlement activity and to create enforcement mechanisms; it was not merely an investigative bill.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

    • 1Assembly Bill A6101

      RefutesEstablishes the "Not on our dime!: Ending New York funding of Israeli settler violence act" to prohibit not-for-profit corporations from engaging in unauthorized support of Israeli settlement activity; allows for recovery of a civil penalty by the state attorney general; creates a private right of action for violations.

    • 2Not On Our Dime!

      SupportsThe bill (A11289/S606), held by Assemblymember Diana Moreno and Senator Jabari Brisport, and initially introduced by then-Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, clarifies that funding Israeli settlement activity and any violations of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court by NYS charities is illegal.

  77. Claim 77
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedAccurate97% confidence▶ 36:31
    “the Park East Synagogue in Manhattan that was doing a real estate fair for settlements.”

    Park East Synagogue in Manhattan hosted a real-estate event that included promotion of properties in West Bank settlements.

    Contemporary reporting confirms that Park East Synagogue hosted the Great Israeli Real Estate Event, whose listings included destinations in West Bank settlements.

    Sources

  78. Claim 78
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedMisleading91% confidence▶ 36:39
    “The Jewish National Fund, which is raising money in synagogues all across the United States, thousands of synagogues, is sending money that is going to literally training young hilltop youth activists who are leading attacks on Palestinian villages.”

    Jewish National Fund funding supported programs that brought at-risk Israeli youth to West Bank settlements or outposts, which were linked to dispossession of Palestinians.

    Investigations support a substantial JNF funding connection to West Bank outpost and youth programs, and official U.S. authorities describe Hilltop Youth as responsible for violent attacks. However, the evidence does not show that JNF directly trained Hilltop Youth activists to lead village attacks, so the statement overstates the documented link.

    Omits: The available reporting describes JNF-KKL funding programs for at-risk youth and settlement outposts, including activities that contributed to dispossession, but does not establish that JNF was literally training activists to conduct attacks on Palestinian villages.

    Sources

  79. Claim 79
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 36:39
    “The Jewish National Fund, which is raising money in synagogues all across the United States, thousands of synagogues,”

    Jewish National Fund raises money through thousands of synagogues across the United States.

    JNF-USA identifies itself as a U.S. nonprofit and fundraising organization, but the sources located do not establish the specific claim that it raises money through thousands of U.S. synagogues. The number and the meaning of “raising money in” are not sufficiently documented here.

    Sources

    • 1About JNF

      BackgroundJewish National Fund-USA is a nonprofit organization and United Nations NGO (non-governmental organization) that gives all generations of Jews a unique voice in building a prosperous future for the land of Israel and its people.

  80. Claim 80
    Attributed toJasper NathanielAuto-approvedUnverifiable50% confidence▶ 37:05
    “the genocide against the people of Gaza”

    Amnesty International has characterized Israel's conduct in Gaza as genocide, while Israel rejects that characterization.

    The term “genocide” is an established legal definition, and credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions: Amnesty International says Israel's conduct meets that definition, while the Israeli government rejects the allegation. The claim is therefore contested rather than simply unverifiable.

    The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.

    Sources

  81. Claim 81
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate96% confidence▶ 37:51
    “the June 2026 letter by former Israeli Prime Minister General Spies, spy chiefs to Netanyahu criticizing what they called quote Jewish terror in the West Bank”

    In June 2026, former Israeli prime ministers and former security chiefs sent a letter to Netanyahu criticizing what they called Jewish terrorism in the West Bank.

    Reporting from June 2026 describes a letter signed by former Israeli prime ministers and former heads of security organizations that accused the government of tolerating or supporting “Jewish terrorism” in the West Bank and threatened legal action.

    Sources

  82. Claim 82
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedAccurate95% confidence▶ 38:17
    “Moshe Yalon has been very outspoken, right? The former Israeli army chief on this.”

    Moshe Ya'alon was a former chief of staff of the Israeli military and had spoken publicly about the issue.

    Ya'alon was the IDF's chief of staff, and reporting documents his public criticism of Israeli conduct and settler-related policies, including remarks concerning alleged ethnic cleansing and violence.

    Sources

  83. Claim 83
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedMisleading50% confidence▶ 38:46
    “They're coming in, they get electricity, they get water, they get internet, they get everything set up. This this is stuff that is in state infrastructure.”

    Settlers receive electricity, water, internet, and complete state-provided infrastructure.

    Israeli authorities do provide infrastructure and services to settlers, including water and electricity. However, the evidence does not support the categorical suggestion that all settlers receive every service and that everything is fully state-set up.

    Omits: The available evidence supports state-provided infrastructure and services, especially water and electricity, but describes connections as occurring 'often' rather than universally; it does not establish that every settler receives every listed service, including internet.

    The intensifier 'everything' was judged literally. The narrower claim that Israeli authorities provide substantial infrastructure and services to settlers is supported.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.

    Sources

  84. Claim 84
    Attributed toDiana ButtuAuto-approvedAccurate95% confidence▶ 38:55
    “So there's a connection between the state and between the settlers.”

    There is a connection between the Israeli state and the settlers.

    Independent reporting documents Israeli government provision of security, infrastructure, services, funding, and support to settlements and outposts. That establishes a state–settler connection as stated, without validating the speaker’s subsequent normative conclusion about condemnation.

    Sources

  85. Claim 85
    Attributed toMehdi HasanAuto-approvedUnverifiable88% confidence▶ 40:38
    “Uh to the several hundred of you joined to watch live.”

    Several hundred people joined the event live.

    The transcript gives a live-attendance estimate, but no public audience analytics or independently verifiable record was located to confirm how many people watched live.

    No supporting links were returned for this claim.