"We Are TERRIFIED!" Israeli Settlers Rampage + Hamas Arms Deal | With Norman Finkelstein
Who said what, and about what
Hover a row to trace its chain · click one to pin its detail
Every claim, checked
No claims match the selected filters.
-
Claim 1
“Benny Morris described the Palestinians as quote a sick psychotic people.”
Benny Morris described Palestinians as “a sick psychotic people.”
Published discussions of Benny Morris’s statements quote him describing Palestinians as “a sick, psychotic people.” The transcript’s attribution is supported, although the wording omits punctuation and surrounding context.
Sources
- 1Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict↗
Supports
The Palestinians, according to Morris, are ‘a sick, psychotic people’.
- 2Beyond Chutzpah: On the Misuse of Anti-Semitism and the Abuse of History↗
Supports
He’s called the Palestinian people “sick, psychotic,” “serial killers” whom Israel must “imprison” or “execute,” and “barbarians” around whom “[s]omething like a cage has to be built.”
- 1Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict↗
-
Claim 2
“as tens of thousands of migrants poured across the Moroccan border into its territory last week.”
Tens of thousands of migrants crossed from Morocco into Spanish territory in the week being discussed.
Contemporaneous reporting described the May 2021 Ceuta influx as more than 8,000 people, including about 2,000 unaccompanied children. That figure is substantially below “tens of thousands.”
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Spain/Morocco: People ‘being used as pawns’ as political games turn violent↗
Refutes
The organisation says that asylum seekers and migrants are being used as pawns in a political game between Morocco and Spain, after more than 8,000 people, including about 2,000 unaccompanied children, entered Ceuta from Morocco irregularly before being subjected to collective expulsions.
- 2Institutional declaration by the President of the Government of Spain in view of the arrival of irregular migrants in Ceuta↗
Background
The President of the Government, Pedro Sánchez, has appeared at Moncloa Palace in response to the sudden arrival of irregular migrants from Morocco to the Spanish city of Ceuta, which the president said represents a serious crisis for Spain and for Europe.
- 1Spain/Morocco: People ‘being used as pawns’ as political games turn violent↗
-
Claim 3
“Israel and the US both loudly back the Moroccan claim to Western Sahara”
The United States and Israel support Morocco’s claim of sovereignty over Western Sahara.
The United States announced recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara in December 2020, and Israel announced recognition in July 2023. The territory’s status remains disputed internationally, but the claim that both governments back Morocco’s claim is accurate.
Sources
- 1Morocco–Western Sahara: Mapping Guidance↗
Supports
On December 10, 2020, President Trump announced United States recognition of Morocco's sovereignty over the territory of Western Sahara.
- 2Israel recognizes Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara↗
Supports
Israel has given official recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara and could open a consulate in the city of Dakhla, which is located in that region, the Kingdom’s Royal Office has announced.
- 3Western Sahara | The United Nations and Decolonization↗
Background
Western Sahara has been on the United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories since 1963 following the transmission of information on Spanish Sahara by Spain under Article 73 e of the Charter of the United Nations.
- 1Morocco–Western Sahara: Mapping Guidance↗
-
Claim 4
“Security Minister Bengavir has encouraged the settlers. In fact, he says he wants Israelis to colonize Gaza next.”
Itamar Ben-Gvir encouraged settlers and said he wanted Israelis to resettle or colonize Gaza.
Reuters reported that Ben-Gvir urged Jewish settlers to return to Gaza, and other reporting documented his calls for Gaza resettlement and Palestinian emigration. “Colonize” is the transcript’s characterization of those resettlement proposals.
Sources
- 1Israeli ministers join ultranationalist conference urging Gaza resettlement↗
Supports
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israel's hard-right Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir urged Jewish settlers to return to Gaza at a packed gathering on Sunday, drawing condemnation from Palestinians who said his words amounted to a call for their forced deportation.
- 2US slams Israeli ministers' statements on resettlement of Palestinians outside Gaza↗
Supports
The U.S.State Department on Tuesday slammed recent statements from Israeli Ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir that advocated for the resettlement of Palestinians outside of Gaza, calling the rhetoric "inflammatory and irresponsible."
- 3While the world is watching Gaza, violence fuels growing tensions in the occupied West Bank↗
Supports
Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right settler with a long history of anti-Arab incitement, responded to the Hamas attack by distributing more weapons to the already well-armed settler population and tasking settlers with security.
- 1Israeli ministers join ultranationalist conference urging Gaza resettlement↗
-
Claim 5
“Daniela Weiss, who's the founder of Nachula”
Daniella Weiss founded the Nachala movement.
Multiple reports identify Daniella Weiss as the founder or leader of Nachala, a far-right Israeli settler organization. The transcript’s spelling of both the name and organization differs from common English transliterations but does not change the attribution.
Sources
- 1Who is Daniella Weiss? The far-right Zionist who wants to colonize Gaza↗
Supports
Nachala ardently advocates for the annexation of Gaza and the West Bank, led by Daniella Weiss, 79, a far-right Zionist.
- 2Daniella Weiss: 'The only path to victory is to resettle Gaza'↗
Supports
Daniella Weiss, chairwoman of the Nachala movement, spoke with Arutz Sheva about the special lobby to resettle Gaza in the Knesset, which has already organized six communities ready to take up immediate residence in the Gaza Strip.
- 1Who is Daniella Weiss? The far-right Zionist who wants to colonize Gaza↗
-
Claim 6
“Yehuda Shimon, a lawyer with an organization that represents Israelis arrested for violence against Palestinians.”
Yehuda Shimon is an Israeli lawyer associated with settlers accused of violence against Palestinians.
Reporting identifies Yehuda Shimon as a lawyer and says he represents alleged settler perpetrators or provides legal counsel to settlers. The precise organizational description in the transcript is less clearly documented, but the underlying identification is supported.
Sources
- 1In Gaza war, Israel’s radical settlers see an opportunity to expand↗
Supports
Yehuda Shimon, a 48-year-old lawyer, looks out from a hilltop at the surrounding Palestinian villages.
- 2Disturbances near Mevo’ot Yeriho↗
Supports
Honenu Attorney Yehuda Shimon, who is providing the Mevo’ot Yeriho residents with legal counsel, stated that, “The anarchist activists arrive on a regular basis to hassle the residents.”
- 3The settlers, Israel’s other ‘army’ in the war against Hamas↗
Supports
Yehuda Shimon, 49, with two of his 10 children at his home in the illegal settlement of Havat Gilad (West Bank).
- 1In Gaza war, Israel’s radical settlers see an opportunity to expand↗
-
Claim 7
“one Jewish life is worth 10 million Palestinian lives and says he knows it's racist to say that”
Yehuda Shimon said that one Jewish life is worth 10 million Palestinian lives and acknowledged that the statement was racist.
The BBC report identified Yehuda Shimon as the speaker of the statement that one Jewish life was worth ten million Palestinian lives, followed by his acknowledgment that the statement was racist. The quotation is an attribution of what he said, not an empirical claim that the valuation is objectively true.
Sources
- 1BBC News report on Yehuda Shimon↗
Supports
One Jewish life is worth ten million Palestinian lives.
- 2An Israeli settler lawyer told the BBC that Israel should kill everyone in the villages of Tell and Sarra in revenge for a single Israeli killed↗
Supports
“One Jewish life is worth ten million,” said Yehuda Shimon of the illegal Havat Gilad settlement. Asked if that sounded racist, he replied: “Yes, I know. But this is the truth. Because God chose us. You are jealous.”
- 1BBC News report on Yehuda Shimon↗
-
Claim 8
“somebody else that follows your religion, Yehuda Shimon, who's a lawyer with a big organization that represents Israelis arrested for violence against Palestinians.”
Yehuda Shimon is a lawyer associated with an organization that provides legal representation to Israelis accused or arrested in violence-related cases involving Palestinians.
Independent reporting identifies Yehuda Shimon as a lawyer and says he works with Honenu, an association that provides legal defense to settlers and others accused of violence. Honenu reporting also identifies him as one of its attorneys.
The intensifier "big" is not independently quantified; the verdict concerns the substantive claims that Shimon is a lawyer and works with an organization providing legal defense in such cases.
Sources
- 1The settlers, Israel’s other ‘army’ in the war against Hamas↗
Supports
His defense lawyer, Adi Keidar, belongs to Honenu, the same association with which Shimon works and which, according to Peace Now, “offers legal defense to settlers or others who exercise violence.”
- 2Honenu: Disturbances near Mevo’ot Yeriho↗
Supports
The police also detained for interrogation one Mevo’ot Yeriho resident, who, with the assistance of Honenu Attorney Yehuda Shimon, filed a complaint against the anarchists.
- 1The settlers, Israel’s other ‘army’ in the war against Hamas↗
-
Claim 9
“He is the one that said a Jewish life is worth 10 million Palestinian lives.”
Yehuda Shimon said that one Jewish life is worth ten million Palestinian lives.
Multiple contemporaneous reproductions of the BBC interview attribute the statement that one Jewish life is worth ten million Palestinian lives to Yehuda Shimon. The wording in the transcript matches those reports in substance.
Sources
- 1An Israeli settler lawyer told the BBC that Israel should kill everyone in the villages of Tell and Sarra in revenge for a single Israeli killed↗
Supports
"One Jewish life is worth ten million," said Yehuda Shimon of the illegal Havat Gilad settlement.
- 2BBC interviews Israeli lawyer Yehuda Shimon, who says, "One Jewish life is [worth] ten million Palestinian lives"↗
Supports
BBC interviews Israeli lawyer Yehuda Shimon, who says, "One Jewish life is [worth] ten million Palestinian lives[...] because G-d choose us[...] because of this you are jealous."
- 1An Israeli settler lawyer told the BBC that Israel should kill everyone in the villages of Tell and Sarra in revenge for a single Israeli killed↗
-
Claim 10
“a senior Israeli lawyer says that a Jewish life is worth 10 million Palestinian lies. I told you why”
The speaker says that a senior Israeli lawyer stated that one Jewish life is worth ten million Palestinian lives.
The transcript appears to mis-transcribe “lives” as “lies.” Multiple reports reproducing a BBC interview quote the Israeli settler-lawyer Yehuda Shimon as saying, “One Jewish life, it's 10 million [Palestinians],” while independent reporting identifies Shimon as an Israeli lawyer and settler.
Sources
- 1Israeli West Bank settler tells BBC attacks on Palestinians are justified as revenge↗
Supports
No," he said, "millions. One Jewish life, it's 10 million [Palestinians]."
- 2West Bank settlers defiant in the face of unprecedented legal action↗
Supports
Mr Shimon, a hard-line Israeli settler, is willing to raise a family on Palestinian land that is illegally occupied in the eyes of the vast majority of the international community but not to the Israeli state.
- 3Brutal Arrests in Gilad Farm↗
Supports
Yehuda Shimon, spokesman for the Gilad Farm near Yitzhar, who also serves as a lawyer on behalf of the Honenu Civil Rights organization, told Israel National News:
- 1Israeli West Bank settler tells BBC attacks on Palestinians are justified as revenge↗
-
Claim 11
“Amnesty International has accused Israel of orchestrating a campaign of ethnic cleansing against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank. That's in a report published in June. It claimed the force displacement was a result of deliberate state policy rather than actions of individual settlers.”
Amnesty International accused Israel of orchestrating an ethnic-cleansing campaign against Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and said forced displacement reflected deliberate state policy rather than merely individual settler actions.
Amnesty International’s June 10, 2026 report describes the campaign as state-sanctioned, state-driven and state-implemented, and explicitly rejects framing it as the work of only individual or rogue settlers. The transcript accurately characterizes Amnesty’s accusation, although the underlying legal and political conclusions are Amnesty’s findings rather than an undisputed judicial ruling.
Sources
- 1Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Supports
The report demonstrates that the ethnic cleansing campaign in Area C is state-sanctioned, state-driven and state-implemented; it seeks to accelerate the Israeli government’s annexation agenda and settlement expansion through war crimes and crimes against humanity.
- 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Supports
Treating Israel’s annexation policies, its campaign of ethnic cleansing and the forcible transfer of Palestinians as the work of a few extremist ministers and individual settlers is counterproductive and ignores the evidence of clear state policy and intent presented in this report.
- 1Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
-
Claim 12
“in last two years more than a hundred new communities were established over Judea and Samaria.”
More than 100 new communities were established in Judea and Samaria during the previous two years.
The term “communities” is undefined here and could refer to officially approved settlements, unauthorized outposts, or organized settlement nuclei. Available sources report different categories and counts, so the exact assertion cannot be judged without specifying what was counted and the precise two-year period.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Bezalel Smotrich calls to annex West Bank, urges erasing Areas A, B, C↗
Background
We have organized all the new young settlements, and approved more than a hundred new settlements in Judea and Samaria
- 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Background
By the end of April 2026, Israeli settlers had established 363 outposts in the occupied West Bank, according to Peace Now.
- 1Bezalel Smotrich calls to annex West Bank, urges erasing Areas A, B, C↗
-
Claim 13
“the Oslo Accords are over”
The Oslo Accords have ended.
The Oslo framework has been severely undermined and modified, but authoritative UN reporting continues to describe areas of Palestinian Authority control and Israeli actions as amendments to arrangements implementing Oslo. Therefore, saying the accords are simply ‘over’ is factually incorrect as a literal claim.
Sources
- 1Assistance to the Palestinian people: Report of the Secretary-General↗
Refutes
On 18 July, the Israel Defense Forces Central Command signed a military order granting the military commander in the area authority over planning and construction in certain parts of Area B of the West Bank, which had been transferred to the Palestinian Authority, effectively amending an order from 1995 that implemented the Oslo Accords.
- 2Press Release: Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – OHCHR Report↗
Refutes
The report also notes the expansion of settlement activity into Area B of the occupied West Bank, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Palestinian Authority according to the Oslo agreements.
- 1Assistance to the Palestinian people: Report of the Secretary-General↗
-
Claim 14
“Palestinian state is over”
The Palestinian state has ended.
Palestine’s statehood and international status have not ended: the United Nations continues to list Palestine as a non-member observer State. The claim could express the speaker’s political opposition to or prediction about Palestinian statehood, but it is false as a literal statement that the Palestinian state is over.
Sources
- 1Non-Member-States↗
Refutes
By resolution A/RES/67/19 of 29 November 2012, the General Assembly accorded non-Member Observer State status to Palestine.
- 2Status of Palestine in the UN - Non-member observer State status↗
Refutes
In accordance with paragraph 2 of resolution 67/19, Palestine has been treated as a non-member observer State by the Secretariat since the adoption of the resolution.
- 1Non-Member-States↗
-
Claim 15
“to to fulfill the word of God that he said to Abraham, come go on a high hill, see the land, walk through the land and build the land”
The speaker attributes to God a command to Abraham to go onto a high hill, see the land, walk through it, and build the land.
The statement combines elements from several Genesis passages but materially changes them. The cited text says God promised the land to Abraham's offspring and told him to walk through it; it does not instruct him to build the land.
Omits: Genesis 13:17 says Abraham should walk through the land in its length and breadth, while Genesis 12:7 says he built an altar; the biblical passages do not say to build the land or specifically to go onto a high hill.
Sources
- 1Genesis 13:17↗
Refutes
Arise, walk through the length and the breadth of the land, for I will give it to you.”
- 2Genesis 12:7↗
Background
The LORD appeared to Abram and said, "To your offspring I will give this land." So he built an altar there to the LORD, who had appeared to him.
- 1Genesis 13:17↗
-
Claim 16
“The UN data indicates that more than 100 West Bank villages were fully or partially emptied between January 2023 and April 2026.”
More than 100 West Bank villages were fully or partially emptied between January 2023 and April 2026.
The reported figure is supported by reporting that cites United Nations data. OCHA recorded 117 predominantly Bedouin and herding communities experiencing full or partial displacement during that period.
Sources
- 1Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Supports
Zanuta is one of 117 predominantly Bedouin and herding Palestinian communities in the occupied West Bank that have faced either full or partial displacement due to settler attacks and related access restrictions between January 2023 and April 2026, according to the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA).
- 2Amnesty accuses Israel's government of 'ethnic cleansing' of Palestinians from the West Bank↗
Supports
U.N. data say that over 100 West Bank villages have been fully or partially emptied out between January 2023 and April 2026.
- 1Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
-
Claim 17
“Last week, the UN's human rights office warned that violence in the West Bank is worsening.”
The UN human rights office warned last week that violence in the West Bank was worsening.
A Reuters report dated July 29, 2026, described an OHCHR warning that violence by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank was worsening. This matches the claim's timing and substance.
Sources
- 1UN rights office warns of worsening settler violence in West Bank↗
Supports
GENEVA, July 29, 2026 – The U.N. human rights office on Wednesday warned of worsening violence by Israeli settlers in the occupied West Bank, and urged international action against the killing of Palestinians as well as the creation of settlements, which it said had reached an all-time high.
- 1UN rights office warns of worsening settler violence in West Bank↗
-
Claim 18
“As of 20th of July, 18 Palestinians have died this year in attacks involving settlers.”
As of July 20, 18 Palestinians had died in 2026 in incidents involving settler attacks.
OCHA reported that, as of July 20, 18 Palestinians had been killed in incidents linked to settler attacks in 2026. OCHA further clarified that 12 were attributed to Israeli settlers, three to Israeli forces, and three remained disputed.
Sources
- 1Humanitarian Situation Report | 23 July 2026↗
Supports
As of 20 July, 18 Palestinians had been killed in such incidents in 2026, including 12 by Israeli settlers, three by Israeli forces, and three where it remains disputed whether Israeli settlers or Israeli forces were responsible.
- 1Humanitarian Situation Report | 23 July 2026↗
-
Claim 19
“There were 190 attacks per month in the first four months of this year.”
There were approximately 190 settler attacks per month in the first four months of 2026.
The reported total was 761 settler attacks during the first four months of 2026, which averages about 190 per month. The figure refers to incidents resulting in casualties or property damage.
Sources
- 1Mapping Israeli settler violence in the West Bank↗
Supports
Some 1,291 settler attacks were recorded in 2023, rising to 1,449 in 2024, 1,835 in 2025 and 761 in the first four months of 2026.
- 2Mapping Israeli settler violence in the West Bank↗
Supports
That equates to an average of 190 attacks per month in 2026, up from 153 per month in 2025 – a 24 percent increase in the monthly rate.
- 1Mapping Israeli settler violence in the West Bank↗
-
Claim 20
“The number of settler attacks has increased each year since 2023 following October the 7th, rising to 1835 last year.”
The number of settler attacks increased each year from 2023 through 2025, reaching 1,835 in 2025.
OCHA figures show 1,291 attacks in 2023, 1,449 in 2024, and 1,835 in 2025, so the annual increase and the 2025 total are supported. October 7, 2023, falls within the period beginning in 2023; the figures themselves do not establish causation by that date.
Sources
- 1Arria-formula Meeting on the West Bank, including East Jerusalem↗
Supports
between January 2023 and December 2025, OCHA recorded 4,575 settler attacks resulting in casualties or property damage—with annual incidents rising from 1,291 in 2023 to 1,835 in 2025—and the full or partial displacement of 87 Palestinian communities.
- 1Arria-formula Meeting on the West Bank, including East Jerusalem↗
-
Claim 21
“we are building the land that was wasteland at the end of the Ottoman Empire.”
The land was wasteland at the end of the Ottoman Empire.
Historical research identifies about 697 settlements and an estimated population of roughly 335,000 within Ottoman Palestine in the late nineteenth century, while other sources document agricultural production and trade. Palestine suffered major wartime damage by the end of Ottoman rule, but describing the whole land as wasteland creates a false impression.
Omits: Late Ottoman Palestine contained hundreds of thousands of residents, hundreds of mapped settlements, and active agricultural production; although World War I caused severe devastation and left some cultivated land untilled, the region was not uniformly wasteland.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1A land without people? The GIScience approach to estimating the population of Ottoman Palestine towards the end of the 19th-century↗
Refutes
It was found that 864 settlements existed within the boundaries of the PEF map. Of these, 697 settlements were within the boundaries of Ottoman Palestine, with a population of ∼335,000.
- 2Mandate for Palestine — Interim report of the Mandatory↗
Background
When General Allenby's army swept over Palestine, in a campaign as brilliant and decisive as any recorded in history, it occupied a country exhausted by war.
- 3Fruit Growing in the Last Period of Ottoman Palestine: Production, Industry and Trade↗
Refutes
Fruit growing was one of the basic tax items for the Ottoman State, an agricultural state.
- 1A land without people? The GIScience approach to estimating the population of Ottoman Palestine towards the end of the 19th-century↗
-
Claim 22
“success of redeeming the land that was desolate when we were not here. This is the h the real history of modern Zionism. We came to a land that was deserted and we beca made it paradise.”
The land was desolate or deserted before Jews arrived, and Zionists redeemed it.
The characterization of the entire land as “deserted” creates a false impression because substantial Palestinian communities, agriculture, and Arab-owned land existed. Some areas were sparsely populated or environmentally degraded, but that does not support describing the whole land as deserted.
Omits: The claim omits that Palestine had a large non-Jewish population and extensive Arab land ownership; UN records estimated 1.369 million non-Jewish residents in December 1947 and about 13 million dunams owned by Arabs before partition.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1Estimated Non-Jewish Population of Palestine December 1947↗
Refutes
Estimated Non-Jewish Population Dec. 1947
- 2Acquisition of land in Palestine↗
Refutes
In the Mandatory Power estimates the total area of land owned by Jews in 1945 to be 1,491,699 dunams, compared with about 13 million dunams owned by Arabs in Palestine.
- 1Estimated Non-Jewish Population of Palestine December 1947↗
-
Claim 23
“that Arabs from all over the Middle East want very much to come and to be part of this party.”
Arabs from throughout the Middle East strongly want to come and become part of Israel.
The statement makes a sweeping claim about the desires of Arabs across an entire region, but it provides no defined population, time period, survey measure or distinction between immigration, asylum, employment and other forms of movement. It cannot be reliably confirmed or refuted as stated.
No supporting links were returned for this claim.
-
Claim 24
“Israeli settlers are breaking the law by taking and rampaging through Palestinian homes and they are removing Palestinians from their homes. They are in some cases killing Palestinians, setting fire to their homes and they are seizing property and land that is not theirs.”
Israeli settlers in the West Bank commit unlawful acts including attacking homes, removing Palestinians, killing Palestinians, burning homes and seizing property or land.
UN, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch reporting documents settler raids on Palestinian homes, killings, arson, property destruction, land seizure and forced displacement. The ICJ has also reaffirmed that Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem violate international law.
Sources
- 1Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Supports
Ideologically motivated Israeli settlers have terrorized Palestinian communities through repeated raids on their homes and villages, beatings, death threats demanding they leave, persistent harassment, the destruction of property and village infrastructure, cutting off access to water and electricity, and theft of their livestock and belongings.
- 2State-backed deadly rampage by Israeli settlers underscores urgent need to dismantle apartheid↗
Supports
In these attacks, in which settlers set fire to homes, trees and vehicles, at least four Palestinians were killed by either settlers or Israeli forces, including 17-year-old boy Omar Hamed near Ramallah, and two men shot dead near Nablus– Abdulrahman Bani Fadel and Mohammed Bani Jami’.
- 3Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
Supports
the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the régime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law.
- 1Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
-
Claim 25
“You can see with your own eyes how the size of property that that is stills to establish uh settlements on plenty of government property. We do not have to cause any harm to any individual in order to causing harm. building the Jewish.”
Israeli settlements can be established on substantial government-owned property without harming anyone.
Israel has classified some West Bank land as state land, but describing settlement construction as harmless omits the legal status of the settlements and documented effects on Palestinian land access, property and displacement. The broader implication that construction on “government property” causes no harm is therefore misleading.
Omits: The statement omits that the ICJ has found the settlement regime in the West Bank and East Jerusalem to violate international law, and that documented settlement expansion and settler violence have displaced Palestinians and involved property and land seizure.
Sources
- 1Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
Background
the Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem, and the régime associated with them, have been established and are being maintained in violation of international law.
- 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Refutes
These practices deliberately intensified an already coercive environment aimed at forcibly displacing and dispossessing Palestinians, manifested in state policies of access restrictions, home demolitions and settlement expansion.
- 1Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
-
Claim 26
“18 18 Palestinians have been killed. There were 190 attacks per month in the first four months of this year.”
There had been 18 Palestinian deaths in settler-related incidents and an average of about 190 settler attacks per month during the first four months of 2026.
OCHA reported 18 Palestinians killed in settler-related incidents in 2026 as of July 20, including deaths attributed to settlers, Israeli forces, or disputed responsibility. UN-reported data also gives approximately 190 settler attacks per month during the first four months of 2026.
The phrase “this year” is judged as 2026, the year matching the available contemporary statistics. The 18-death figure was reported as of July 20, while the 190-attacks-per-month figure refers specifically to January–April 2026.
Sources
- 1Humanitarian Situation Report | 23 July 2026↗
Supports
As of 20 July, 18 Palestinians had been killed in such incidents in 2026, including 12 by Israeli settlers, three by Israeli forces, and three where it remains disputed whether Israeli settlers or Israeli forces were responsible.
- 2Mapping Israeli settler violence in the West Bank↗
Supports
Some 1,291 settler attacks were recorded in 2023, rising to 1,449 in 2024, 1,835 in 2025 and 761 in the first four months of 2026. That equates to an average of 190 attacks per month in 2026, up from 153 per month in 2025 – a 24 percent increase in the monthly rate.
- 1Humanitarian Situation Report | 23 July 2026↗
-
Claim 27
“the Israeli settlers are rampaging around grabbing any Palestinian homes that they can get their hands on, which is a crime.”
Israeli settlers are rampaging around and taking Palestinian homes, which is a crime.
UN reporting documents extensive settler attacks, including raids on homes, arson, theft, property destruction and forced displacement. That evidence supports the existence of serious criminal acts, but not the sweeping claim that settlers are taking any Palestinian home they can reach.
Omits: The statement generalizes from documented attacks, arson, theft, property damage and forced displacement to settlers taking any Palestinian home they can; the UN does not report that all accessible Palestinian homes are being seized, nor that all settlers are involved.
The intensifier "any" was judged literally. Documented cases support serious settler attacks and displacement, but not universal seizure of Palestinian homes.
Sources
- 1Humanitarian Situation Update #337 - West Bank↗
Supports
The attacks involved night raids, arson, theft and property destruction.
- 2OHCHR: Settler violence drives forced displacement in the West Bank↗
Supports
The attacks resulted in extensive property damage, arson attacks, injuries, and forcible displacement of Palestinian families, primarily affecting Bedouin and herding households.
- 1Humanitarian Situation Update #337 - West Bank↗
-
Claim 28
“They we need to encourage Palestinians to leave. They we need to encourage Palestinians to migrate.”
Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich called for encouraging Palestinians to leave or migrate.
Both ministers publicly advocated encouraging Palestinian emigration. Smotrich used the phrase "encourage migration," while Ben-Gvir called encouraging emigration a solution for Palestinian residents of Gaza.
Sources
- 1Smotrich urges ramping up West Bank, Gaza settlements, pushing Palestinians out↗
Supports
At conference, Religious Zionism leader says Palestinians who insist on statehood should be encouraged to emigrate to an Arab state; other coalition members urge Israeli sovereignty from Jordan River to sea
- 2At settlements conference, Ben Gvir repeats call for 'voluntary emigration' of Palestinians↗
Supports
National Security Minister and ultranationalist leader Itamar Ben Gvir says that Israel should “encourage voluntary emigration” of Palestinians as part of the country’s response to the October 7 atrocities during an address to the resettle Gaza conference in Jerusalem.
- 1Smotrich urges ramping up West Bank, Gaza settlements, pushing Palestinians out↗
-
Claim 29
“That has been the Zionist plan since the very beginning.”
Encouraging Palestinians to leave has been the Zionist plan since the beginning of Zionism.
Historians agree that population-transfer ideas appeared in Zionist political thought, but they disagree over whether this amounted to a continuous, movement-wide plan from Zionism's beginning. Masalha argues it did; Benny Morris distinguishes transfer thinking from a preplanned policy or master plan of expulsion.
The intensifier "since the very beginning" was judged as a claim about an overarching Zionist plan, rather than the narrower claim that some Zionist leaders discussed or supported population transfer.
The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.
Sources
- 1The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Thinking and Practice: Historical Roots and Contemporary Challenges↗
Supports
From the founding father of political Zionism, Theodor Herzl, to the founding father of the Israeli state and its first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, all important Zionist leaders embraced the notion of “transfer” in one form or another; the differences focused on the modalities and practicalities of “transfer.”
- 2Explaining Transfer: Zionist Thinking and the Creation of the Palestinian Refugee Problem↗
Refutes
It was not the product of a preconceived master plan or, indeed, of a governmental policy.
- 1The Concept of "Transfer" in Zionist Thinking and Practice: Historical Roots and Contemporary Challenges↗
-
Claim 30
“but the building of settlements is not a new endeavor.”
The construction of Israeli settlements is not a new endeavor.
Israeli settlement construction in the occupied Palestinian territories began after the 1967 war and continued for decades before the government referenced in the interview.
Sources
- 1Israeli settlements in Gaza and the West Bank (Part I)↗
Supports
The establishment of settlements in the occupied territories started immediately after the 1967 war.
- 2Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
Background
In particular, the Court’s analysis examines, in turn, the questions of the prolonged occupation, Israel’s policy of settlement, the annexation of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, and its adoption of related legislation and measures that are allegedly discriminatory.
- 1Israeli settlements in Gaza and the West Bank (Part I)↗
-
Claim 31
“what we're witnessing today is an unprecedented uh violence that takes several forms.”
The violence being witnessed in the West Bank is unprecedented and takes several forms.
The claim does not define the comparison period, geographic scope, or metric by which the violence is supposedly unprecedented. Available UN data document serious and increasing violence, but do not by themselves establish the undefined superlative "unprecedented."
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Humanitarian Situation Update #256: West Bank↗
Background
Since mid-2024, OCHA has documented a surge in Israeli settler attacks and access restrictions imposed against Palestinians near seven newly established settlement outposts in Area B of the West Bank.
- 1Humanitarian Situation Update #256: West Bank↗
-
Claim 32
“It's burning homes, burning trees, uprooting trees, uh, burning mosques, it's, uh, polluting water.”
Israeli settlers have burned Palestinian homes, burned and uprooted trees, attacked or burned mosques, and damaged or polluted Palestinian water resources.
UN and human-rights reporting documents settlers burning homes, agricultural land, trees and mosques, damaging water infrastructure, and forcing or pressuring Palestinian communities to leave. However, the sources describe damage to water resources rather than establishing water pollution, and they do not support the absolute wording "everything they can."
Omits: The available documentation describes damage to or destruction of water resources and infrastructure, not necessarily pollution or contamination of water; it also documents pressure and forced displacement but not literally every possible effort.
The intensifier "everything they can" was judged as part of the claim; the evidence supports substantial pressure to leave but not the literal completeness of every possible effort.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1Statement on a new wave of settler attacks displacing Palestinian herding communities and consolidating settlements and outposts in the occupied West Bank↗
Supports
In incidents monitored by UN Human Rights Office, settlers have attacked women and children in or near their homes, set fire to and vandalized property, stolen livestock, and destroyed infrastructure to prevent the community’s access to water.
- 2Humanitarian Situation Update #250 | West Bank↗
Supports
Residents found the mosque on fire when they went to perform dawn prayers and began putting out the fire.
- 1Statement on a new wave of settler attacks displacing Palestinian herding communities and consolidating settlements and outposts in the occupied West Bank↗
-
Claim 33
“everything they can to encourage Palestinians to leave these villages.”
Settler actions pressure Palestinians to leave their villages.
UN reporting describes a coercive environment in which settler attacks and related Israeli policies push Palestinians to leave their homes and communities, and says impunity is facilitating and encouraging such violence.
Sources
- 1Unshattered | United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs↗
Supports
Palestinian herder communities often face pressures from Israeli military forces and Israeli settlers that push them to leave their areas.
- 2Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – UN report↗
Supports
Longstanding and pervasive impunity is “facilitating and encouraging violence against and harassment of Palestinians”, it adds.
- 1Unshattered | United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs↗
-
Claim 34
“they managed to succeed in in to empty many communities.”
Settler violence has emptied or displaced residents from many Palestinian communities.
UN OCHA has documented displacement from numerous West Bank herding communities, while a UN Human Rights Office report documented more than 36,000 Palestinians forcibly displaced amid settlement expansion and settler and security-force violence.
Sources
- 1The other mass displacement: settlers advance on West Bank herders↗
Supports
In 15 herding communities across the West Bank, at least 98 households comprising 828 people, including 313 children, have been displaced amid settler violence or increased movement restrictions since 7 October.
- 2Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – UN report↗
Supports
The Government of Israel has accelerated unlawful settlement expansion and annexation of large parts of the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, forcibly displacing over 36,000 Palestinians amid increasing violence by Israeli security forces and settlers, says a UN Human Rights Office report.
- 1The other mass displacement: settlers advance on West Bank herders↗
-
Claim 35
“the military protects them. the military accompanies them”
Israeli military forces protect or accompany settlers during attacks or settlement-related activity.
UN reporting states that Israeli security forces accompanied or actively supported attackers in almost half of documented cases, and Human Rights Watch documented attacks involving active army participation or failure to protect Palestinians. The broad wording implies universal or routine protection, which omits the reported frequency and limits.
Omits: UN reporting found Israeli security forces accompanied or actively supported attackers in almost half of documented cases, not that the military protected settlers in every incident or uniformly across the West Bank.
The generalizing phrase "the settlers enjoy the protection" was judged as a broad claim about settler attacks rather than a claim about every individual incident.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1Rise in intimidation, settler violence in the West Bank, warns OCHA↗
Supports
It added that in almost half the cases, Israeli security forces “accompanied or actively supported” the attackers.
- 2West Bank: Israel Responsible for Rising Settler Violence↗
Supports
The evidence shows that armed settlers, with the active participation of army units, repeatedly cut off road access and raided Palestinian communities, detained, assaulted, and tortured residents, chased them out of their homes and off their lands at gunpoint or coerced them to leave with death threats, and blocked them from taking their belongings.
- 1Rise in intimidation, settler violence in the West Bank, warns OCHA↗
-
Claim 36
“they are helping uh implement uh the plan of the current government of Israel and many governments before that to annex more and more land from the West Bank.”
The current Israeli government and successive Israeli governments have pursued policies expanding settlements and Israeli control over the West Bank, including annexation-related measures.
UN and Amnesty reports describe annexation-related policies and settlement expansion by the current government and a settlement project pursued by successive Israeli governments since 1967. The legal characterization of annexation is distinct from the documented expansion of control and settlements.
Sources
- 1Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – UN report↗
Supports
The Government of Israel has accelerated unlawful settlement expansion and annexation of large parts of the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, forcibly displacing over 36,000 Palestinians amid increasing violence by Israeli security forces and settlers, says a UN Human Rights Office report.
- 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Supports
Since Israel captured the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip in June 1967, and subjected Palestinians to a brutal military occupation, successive Israeli governments, regardless of their position on the political spectrum, have consistently pursued and enabled a policy of Jewish settlement creation and expansion.
- 1Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – UN report↗
-
Claim 37
“the government uh allows these attacks to happen with the hope that they succeed in pushing more and more Palestinians outside uh of their towns”
The Israeli government permits settler attacks in the hope that they will drive Palestinians out of their communities.
UN reporting supports the existence of state enabling, impunity, displacement, and policies that create pressure to leave, but the specific claim about the government’s hope or subjective intent is not directly established by the cited evidence. The undefined intent term “with the hope” makes the claim unconfirmable as stated.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – UN report↗
Background
“Settler violence continued in a coordinated, strategic and largely unchallenged manner, with Israeli authorities playing the central role in directing, participating in or enabling this conduct,” the report says, making it difficult to distinguish between State and settler violence.
- 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Background
The report also demonstrates – contrary to what too many in the international community suggest – that the campaign is not the product of 'rogue' settlers, settlers’ organisations or 'extremist' government ministers, but an integral part of an organised state policy of ethnic cleansing that serves to entrench Israel’s system of apartheid against Palestinians, expand Israel’s control over and fragmentation of Palestinian territory, and ultimately ensure its annexation – all of which is prohibited under international law.
- 1Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – UN report↗
-
Claim 38
“making empty statements to the international community that they condemn these attacks. But we know that uh they're doing nothing to stop them.”
Israeli authorities do nothing to stop settler attacks while issuing condemnations.
UN reporting supports serious, often unchallenged settler violence and widespread impunity, but the claim that authorities are doing “nothing” is too absolute. Israel’s own foreign ministry states that the government condemns such violence and that security forces work to apprehend perpetrators.
Omits: The statement omits that Israeli authorities publicly condemn settler violence and that Israeli security forces have at least sometimes investigated or apprehended perpetrators, even though UN reporting describes the violence as largely unchallenged and impunity as pervasive.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1Press Release | Ministry of Foreign Affairs↗
Refutes
The government of Israel and the settler movement itself condemns it, and security forces work to apprehend these forms of illegal behaviour.
- 2Israel’s settlement expansion drives mass displacement in West Bank – UN report↗
Supports
“Settler violence continued in a coordinated, strategic and largely unchallenged manner, with Israeli authorities playing the central role in directing, participating in or enabling this conduct,” the report says, making it difficult to distinguish between State and settler violence.
- 1Press Release | Ministry of Foreign Affairs↗
-
Claim 39
“the Jewish insider described you as the high priest of anti-semitic Christianity after an interview you did with Tucker Carlson in 2024.”
Jewish Insider described the interviewee as “the high priest of antisemitic Christianity” after his 2024 Tucker Carlson interview.
Jewish Insider’s April 11, 2024 article used the headline “Tucker Carlson’s ‘pastor from Bethlehem’ is ‘the high priest of antisemitic Christianity’” and discussed Munther Isaac’s interview with Carlson.
Sources
- 1Tucker Carlson’s ‘pastor from Bethlehem’ is ‘the high priest of antisemitic Christianity’↗
Supports
Tucker Carlson’s ‘pastor from Bethlehem’ is ‘the high priest of antisemitic Christianity’
- 1Tucker Carlson’s ‘pastor from Bethlehem’ is ‘the high priest of antisemitic Christianity’↗
-
Claim 40
“they claimed that on October the 8th, the day after the appalling uh terror attacks of October the 7th, uh you said in your sermon, "What is happening is an embodiment of the injustice that has befallen us as”
The interviewee said in an October 8, 2023 sermon that the events were an embodiment of injustice against Palestinians, one day after the October 7 attack.
Jewish Insider identifies Munther Isaac’s sermon as occurring on October 8, 2023, describes the attack as occurring the previous day, and reproduces the quoted statement from the sermon.
Sources
- 1Tucker Carlson’s ‘pastor from Bethlehem’ is ‘the high priest of antisemitic Christianity’↗
Supports
Munther Isaac, the pastor featured in a 40-minute interview with Carlson that aired on X on Tuesday, gave a sermon on Oct. 8, 2023, in which he said the attack — a day prior — in which 1,200 Israelis were slaughtered by Hamas was a logical outcome.
- 2Tucker Carlson’s ‘pastor from Bethlehem’ is ‘the high priest of antisemitic Christianity’↗
Supports
“What is happening is an embodiment of the injustice that has befallen us as Palestinians from the Nakba until now,” Isaac said in the sermon
- 1Tucker Carlson’s ‘pastor from Bethlehem’ is ‘the high priest of antisemitic Christianity’↗
-
Claim 41
“the Israeli youth who were celebrating a concert in the open air, the Nova Music Festival, just outside the borders of Gaza”
Israeli youths were attending the open-air Nova Music Festival just outside the Gaza border.
The festival was held near Kibbutz Re’im in southern Israel, close to the Gaza border, and involved thousands of young attendees.
Sources
- 1IDF okayed Nova music festival, but didn't inform troops deployed at border, probe finds↗
Supports
Partygoers flee the Nova festival near the Gaza border community of Re'im as Hamas terrorists approached on October 7, 2023.
- 2Detailed findings on attacks carried out on and after 7 October 2023 in Israel↗
Supports
The Nova festival saw the highest number of people killed by the militarywing of Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups on 7 October in one location.
- 1IDF okayed Nova music festival, but didn't inform troops deployed at border, probe finds↗
-
Claim 42
“they were effectively trying to justify Hamas slaughtering uh 1,200 Israelis, including hundreds of young people at the music festival.”
Hamas killed 1,200 Israelis, including hundreds of young people at the music festival.
UN reporting describes more than 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals killed, while a UN inquiry attributes the attack to Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups. Hundreds were killed at Nova, but the wording incorrectly presents the entire 1,200 as Israelis killed by Hamas alone.
Omits: The approximately 1,200 figure includes foreign nationals as well as Israelis, and the overall toll was attributed to Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups rather than exclusively to Hamas; the festival deaths were a subset of the total.
Sources
- 1One year of unimaginable suffering since the 7 October attack – OCHA↗
Refutes
According to Israeli sources, more than 1,200 Israelis and foreign nationals have been killed, including children, and nearly 5,500 have been injured.
- 2Detailed findings on attacks carried out on and after 7 October 2023 in Israel↗
Background
The Nova festival saw the highest number of people killed by the militarywing of Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups on 7 October in one location.
- 1One year of unimaginable suffering since the 7 October attack – OCHA↗
-
Claim 43
“we didn't know that a massacre took place in the music uh festival”
A massacre took place at the Nova music festival during the October 7 attack.
The UN Commission of Inquiry documented that the Nova festival was the single location with the highest number of people killed on October 7, with at least 364 festival attendees among the dead.
Sources
- 1Detailed findings on attacks carried out on and after 7 October 2023 in Israel↗
Supports
The Nova festival saw the highest number of people killed by the militarywing of Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups on 7 October in one location.
- 2Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Supports
The Commission found that acts of sexual violence were committed on 7 October in Israel, including at the Nova festival, on road 232, at Nahal Oz military base and kibbutzim Re’im, Nir Oz and Kfar Aza.
- 1Detailed findings on attacks carried out on and after 7 October 2023 in Israel↗
-
Claim 44
“the attacks happened as the aftermath of a brutal brutal uh siege”
The October 7 attacks occurred as the aftermath of a brutal siege of Gaza.
Gaza had been under a long-running blockade, but “aftermath” asserts a causal relationship between that condition and the attacks, while “brutal” and “siege” are not operationally defined here. The existence of the blockade can be documented, but this causal formulation cannot be conclusively verified from the available evidence.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Locked in: Humanitarian impact of two years of blockade on the Gaza Strip↗
Background
This report documents the humanitarian impact of the blockade imposed by Israel since June 2007 on the 1.5 million people living in the Gaza Strip.
- 1Locked in: Humanitarian impact of two years of blockade on the Gaza Strip↗
-
Claim 45
“Israel's retaliation uh uh the genocidal war that happened since October 7th against the people of Gaza which continues today”
Israel's retaliation since October 7 constituted a genocidal war against the people of Gaza and was continuing at the time of the statement.
The UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, while Israel formally rejected that conclusion. Because credible named institutions have reached opposing conclusions on the defined legal characterization, the claim is contested rather than unverifiable.
The intensifier “genocidal” is judged as stated. The underlying existence of Israel's military campaign and its continuation are not the disputed part; the contested issue is whether the campaign legally constitutes genocide.
The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.
Sources
- 1Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip, UN Commission of Inquiry finds↗
Supports
Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel said in a new report today.
- 2Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry↗
Refutes
Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry, spreading the malicious “genocide” narrative, in attempt to delegitimize and demonize the State of Israel.
- 1Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip, UN Commission of Inquiry finds↗
-
Claim 46
“when it comes to Palestinians right to resist their occupiers, that's what we as Palestinians emphasize. This is what the international law guarantees us as long as you know we don't target uh civilians.”
International law guarantees Palestinians a right to resist occupation provided they do not target civilians.
The prohibition on targeting civilians is accurate, but the claim overstates the legal effect of that condition. The ICRC states that civilians in occupied territories may not violently resist the occupation under IHL, so international law does not simply guarantee an unrestricted right to armed resistance whenever civilians are not targeted.
Omits: International humanitarian law does not provide a blanket authorization for violent resistance by civilians; it regulates conduct during conflict and prohibits attacks on civilians, while the legal status of armed national-liberation movements involves additional conditions.
Sources
- 1Civilian population | How does law protect in war?↗
Refutes
Because of that obligation, IHL allows them neither to violently resist occupation of their territory by the enemy nor to try to liberate that territory by violent means.
- 2FAQ: Rules of war | ICRC↗
Background
For example, the following acts would constitute war crimes in all armed conflicts: Deliberately targeting civilians which are not directly taking part in hostilities;
- 1Civilian population | How does law protect in war?↗
-
Claim 47
“it's quite clear that Israeli settlers have been waging a campaign of terror on the West Bank now for a considerable period of time, which most of the international community views as criminal uh activity.”
Israeli settlers have conducted a prolonged campaign of terror in the West Bank that most of the international community regards as criminal activity.
UN and government sources document extensive settler violence, intimidation, displacement, and acts described by some governments as settler terrorism. But the claim's broader assertion about what "most of the international community" believes is not well-posed enough to verify as stated.
The intensifier "most of the international community" is not operationally defined, so the claim cannot be measured without specifying which states or institutions count and what threshold constitutes "most."
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1OHCHR: Settler violence drives forced displacement in the West Bank↗
Supports
Across the West Bank, settler violence is clearing large swaths of Area C, the Jordan Valley, and parts of Area B, of Palestinians with the support and participation of Israeli security forces.
- 2Settlements in the West Bank are a flagrant violation of international law and must cease↗
Supports
They represent an accelerated campaign to prevent a future Palestinian State driven by an extremist ideology, which even includes acts of settler terrorism.
- 1OHCHR: Settler violence drives forced displacement in the West Bank↗
-
Claim 48
“In the case of my own government, the opportunity was first Afghanistan, then they thought Iraq, then they thought Syria, then they they thought um Iran. That was their plan to exploit to the maximum 911.”
The U.S. government’s post-9/11 plan was to exploit the attacks through successive campaigns in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Iran.
Official U.S. documents clearly document the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and a broad post-9/11 counterterrorism strategy, but they do not establish the speaker’s asserted unified plan to use 9/11 to pursue Syria and Iran, or the undefined claim that the attacks were exploited “to the maximum.”
Sources
- 1National Strategy for Combating Terrorism↗
Background
The United States' strategy for combating terrorism focuses on taking the fight to the terrorists themselves.
- 2Global Message: A Central Front in the War on Terror↗
Background
We are fighting that enemy in Iraq and Afghanistan so that we do not meet him in our own cities.
- 1National Strategy for Combating Terrorism↗
-
Claim 49
“And the unique opportunity was first to solve the Gaza question once and for all. And this the way they wanted to solve it was a massive expulsion.”
Israeli authorities viewed the post-October 7 war as an opportunity to permanently expel Gaza’s population.
An Israeli government ministry did draft a proposal to transfer Gaza’s population to Sinai, and the paper called that option desirable for Israel’s security. But the available evidence does not show that the Israeli cabinet adopted it as its policy or that Israeli authorities collectively wanted to implement it.
Omits: The documented expulsion proposal was a nonbinding Intelligence Ministry “concept paper” that Netanyahu’s office described as hypothetical and said had not been substantively discussed in an official forum.
Sources
- 1An Israeli ministry, in a 'concept paper,' proposes transferring Gaza civilians to Egypt’s Sinai↗
Background
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office played down the report compiled by the Intelligence Ministry as a hypothetical exercise — a “concept paper.”
- 2An Israeli ministry, in a 'concept paper,' proposes transferring Gaza civilians to Egypt’s Sinai↗
Refutes
An Israeli official familiar with the document said it isn’t binding and that there was no substantive discussion of it with security officials.
- 1An Israeli ministry, in a 'concept paper,' proposes transferring Gaza civilians to Egypt’s Sinai↗
-
Claim 50
“the means to achieve that massive explosion was genocidal”
The means used to pursue Gaza’s mass expulsion were genocidal.
The legal characterization is expressly disputed. The UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Israel committed genocide in Gaza, while Israel’s Foreign Ministry rejected that conclusion; the transcript presents the characterization as settled rather than acknowledging the named institutional disagreement.
The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.
Sources
- 1Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip, UN Commission of Inquiry finds↗
Supports
Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip, UN Commission of Inquiry finds
- 2Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry↗
Refutes
Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry, spreading the malicious “genocide” narrative, in attempt to delegitimize and demonize the State of Israel.
- 1Israel has committed genocide in the Gaza Strip, UN Commission of Inquiry finds↗
-
Claim 51
“they proceeded to eliminate Hezbollah or they thought they eliminated Hezbollah”
Israel eliminated Hezbollah after October 7, or believed it had eliminated Hezbollah.
Israel substantially degraded Hezbollah and killed senior figures, but it did not eliminate the organization. The transcript’s self-correction acknowledges uncertainty, yet the wording still gives the impression that elimination was achieved or plausibly complete.
Omits: Hezbollah remained an active armed organization after the fighting; UN reporting in April 2025 described an Israeli strike targeting a Hezbollah official and continued violence despite the ceasefire.
Sources
- 1Lebanon: UN expresses deep concern over latest Israeli airstrikes, in call for restraint↗
Refutes
Tuesday morning’s strike reportedly targeted a Hezbollah official who Israel accused of aiding Hamas in planning an imminent terror attack against civilians.
- 2Lebanon: UN expresses deep concern over latest Israeli airstrikes, in call for restraint↗
Refutes
The United Nations on Tuesday expressed deep concern over the latest escalation of violence in Lebanon, despite the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah
- 1Lebanon: UN expresses deep concern over latest Israeli airstrikes, in call for restraint↗
-
Claim 52
“Benny Morris for years literally every couple of years he would run an write an op-ed saying two things number one, Israel has to attack Iran. And number two, if the United States doesn't join in, Israel has no option except to use nonconventional, i.e. nuclear weapons.”
Benny Morris repeatedly published op-eds every few years calling for an Israeli attack on Iran and warning that Israel might use nuclear weapons if the United States did not join.
Morris did publicly advocate striking Iran and discussed possible nuclear use, including in a 2008 article and a June 2024 Haaretz op-ed. The transcript overstates the frequency and changes the condition attached to nuclear use from failure of conventional means to lack of U.S. participation.
Omits: The documented examples establish such arguments in 2008 and 2024, but do not establish a publication pattern occurring literally every few years, and the documented nuclear condition is inability to destroy Iran’s program conventionally rather than simply U.S. nonparticipation.
Sources
- 1An Israeli Strike on Iran, a Plan That Just Doesn't Fly↗
Supports
Take one of the country's most important historians, the erstwhile dove Benny Morris, who recently predicted in the New York Times that "Israel will almost surely attack Iran's nuclear sites in the next four to seven months"
- 2Benny Morris↗
Background
Morris reiterated this view in an op-ed in Haaretz in June 2024, writing, "If Israel proves incapable of destroying the Iranian nuclear project using conventional weaponry, then it may not have any option but to resort to its nonconventional capabilities."
- 1An Israeli Strike on Iran, a Plan That Just Doesn't Fly↗
-
Claim 53
“Benny Morris described the Palestinians as quote a sick psychotic people quoting him.”
Benny Morris described Palestinians as “a sick, psychotic people.”
A published discussion of Morris’s statements reproduces the characterization “sick, psychotic” as a description he applied to the Palestinian people, while also attributing additional hostile language to him.
Sources
- 1Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict↗
Supports
He’s called the Palestinian people “sick, psychotic,” “serial killers” whom Israel must “imprison” or “execute,” and “barbarians” around whom “[s]omething like a cage has to be built.”
- 1Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict↗
-
Claim 54
“The presumptions, the assumptions of Daniela Weiss, they may sound radical to an American viewer, but they are typical of Israeli society. from Daniela Weiss at one end of the spectrum to Benny Morris who was once Israel's leading historian at the other end of the spectrum.”
The assumptions associated with Daniella Weiss are typical of Israeli society and span the Israeli political spectrum.
“Typical of Israeli society” and “across the Israeli spectrum” are not defined operationally, and the cited comparison between two individuals cannot establish how representative their views are of Israeli society as a whole.
No supporting links were returned for this claim.
-
Claim 55
“look at the current UN report on the deliberate killing of Palestinian children”
A current UN Commission report addresses the deliberate or wilful killing of Palestinian children.
The UN Commission’s June 18, 2026 report examines violations against Palestinian children and concludes that investigated killings by Israeli security forces amounted to the war crime of wilful killing.
Sources
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Supports
The Commission concludes that the cases it investigated show a consistent pattern of conduct of the Israeli security forces which amounts to the war crime of wilfully causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or health, and, where such conduct led to the deaths of children, it amounts to the war crime of wilful killing.
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
-
Claim 56
“A group of settlers urinating on a child.”
The UN report describes an incident in which a settler urinated on a Palestinian child.
The underlying incident is documented, but the plural wording creates the impression that the group collectively urinated on the child. The UN report specifically attributes the urination to one settler.
Omits: The report says that one settler urinated on one of two 15-year-old boys; it does not say that multiple settlers urinated on a child.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Supports
A settler urinated on one of the boys and fractured his leg.
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
-
Claim 57
“A group of settlers kidnapping a four and fiveyear-old child, brother and sister, and tying them to a tree.”
Israeli settlers abducted a girl and her brother who were both under five years old and tied them to a tree.
The abduction and tying to a tree are documented, but the transcript gives specific ages that the report does not provide and that are inconsistent with the report’s wording that both children were under five.
Omits: The UN report describes the children as a girl and her brother who were under five years old; it does not establish that they were specifically four and five years old.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Supports
In one example, in April 2024, settlers assaulted and abducted a girl and her brother under five years while they were playing outside their house and tied them to a tree.
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
-
Claim 58
“A bunch of Israeli soldiers, not settlers soldiers attacking a 16-year-old who is hearing impaired and kicking him on the ground.”
Israeli soldiers, rather than settlers, attacked a hearing-impaired 16-year-old and kicked him on the ground.
The available UN report text located for this passage documents other incidents of violence against Palestinian children, but I could not verify this specific allegation, including the victim's age, hearing impairment, and the soldiers' conduct, from a reliable source.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Refutes
In another incident, on 18 October 2024, a 16-year-old boy with hearing impairment was beaten by around 15 Israeli settlers, carrying sticks and knives, while he was working alone in his farm in Salfit.
- 2A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Refutes
The settlers took turns kicking him, one of them pressed his knee on the boy’s face and others banged his head against a rock.
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
-
Claim 59
“The soldiers stand around laughing, filming the scene and blocking any medical aid for him.”
Israeli soldiers shot a Palestinian, stood around him, filmed the scene, and blocked medical aid while he pleaded for help.
I could not locate a reliable source verifying this specific sequence of events or establishing that it appears in the referenced UN report. General evidence of Israeli forces obstructing medical access does not verify this particular incident.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Unverifiable. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Supports
Around 10 soldiers are seen cordoning the boy. One soldier is filming him with his phone while others seem to be scanning the area and rooftops.
- 2A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Supports
Israeli soldiers also deliberately prevented a waiting PRCS ambulance from reaching the site by aiming gun laser light on the heads of the paramedic and the driver.
- 3A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Background
On 16 November 2025, during an Israeli military raid on the Al-Faraa refugee camp in Tubas, a 14-year-old Palestinian boy was shot and killed by Israeli soldiers.
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
-
Claim 60
“Israel is a citizen army.”
Israel has a compulsory-service military commonly described as a citizen army.
Official Israeli sources describe the IDF as a compulsory-service military and state that service is required for major categories of Israeli citizens, while also listing exemptions.
The phrase “citizen army” is judged as shorthand for Israel’s compulsory-service military, not as a literal claim that every Israeli citizen serves.
Sources
- 1Our Soldiers: the Men and Women of the Israeli Defense Forces↗
Supports
The State of Israel requires every Israeli citizen over the age of 18 who is Jewish, Druze or Circassian to serve in the Israel Defense Forces (although there are some notable exceptions).
- 2The Path to Becoming an IDF Soldier↗
Supports
Since its formation on May 31, 1948, the IDF has been a compulsory service military.
- 1Our Soldiers: the Men and Women of the Israeli Defense Forces↗
-
Claim 61
“The Israeli settlers in the West Bank, many of them are behaving illegally and the government is going along with them and protecting them in various ways. Certainly not prosecuting them for committing these crimes more or less on a daily basis in the West Bank”
Many West Bank settlers behave illegally, Israeli authorities often protect or enable them, and accountability for settler crimes is broadly lacking.
The broad assertion is substantially supported by the UN Commission’s findings on protection, enablement, and lack of accountability. The “more or less on a daily basis” wording overstates what the cited evidence specifically establishes.
Omits: The UN report supports protection, enablement, and near-total impunity, but also notes periodic government condemnations and occasional dismantling of unauthorized outposts; it does not establish that such crimes go unprosecuted literally every day.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Supports
Israeli authorities are directly involved in settler attacks that have killed, caused physical and mental harm, and displaced Palestinian people. Israeli authorities have enabled such attacks through financial and military support while Israeli judicial and law enforcement authorities have maintained a status-quo of impunity for settler violence for decades.
- 2A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
Background
Despite periodic token government statements condemning settler violence and the occasional dismantling of one or two unauthorized outposts, Israeli authorities have taken no meaningful or sustained measures to curb settler attacks.
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2 — Israeli violations and crimes against Palestinian children↗
-
Claim 62
“they believe that rem removing small communities of shepherds serves that purpose.”
Israeli authorities and violent settler groups share strategic objectives involving settlement entrenchment, annexation, and displacement of Palestinians.
UN reporting supports a connection between settler violence, settlement entrenchment, annexation, and the displacement of Palestinian herding communities. However, the transcript overgeneralizes the motives to 'they' without specifying which settlers or distinguishing organized groups from the settler population as a whole.
Omits: The claim presents the motives as applying collectively to the settlers, while the UN evidence describes shared strategic objectives of Israeli authorities and violent settler groups and documents displacement; it does not establish that all or most individual settlers hold the stated belief.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2↗
Supports
Both the State of Israel and violent settler groups share and collaborate in the same strategic objectives: the entrenchment of Israeli settlement on Palestinian land, annexation of the West Bank and the displacement of the Palestinian population.
- 2Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Palestinian communities↗
Supports
This report examines measures implemented since Israel’s 37th government was formed on 29 December 2022 until the end of 2025 that sought to formalize the annexation of Area C of the occupied West Bank to Israel and forcibly remove Palestinians from it.
- 1A/HRC/62/CRP.2↗
-
Claim 63
“I think at least half of the Israelis don't agree with this”
At least half of Israelis do not agree with the annexationist purpose described by the speaker.
The claim does not define which annexationist policy or population is being measured, and it gives no survey date or question wording. Available Israeli surveys have produced materially different results depending on whether they ask about full annexation, partial annexation, citizenship rights, or separation.
Sources
- 1Findings of the National Security Survey: June 2026↗
Background
Regarding the preferred approach to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, public opinion is divided: 27% believe Israel should seek separation from the Palestinians; 25% support a two-state solution; and 25% support full annexation without granting civil rights.
- 2Over Half of Jewish Israelis Support Annexation↗
Background
The Israeli Voice Index for April 2020, found that 52% of Jewish Israelis support Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's stated policy of extending Israeli sovereignty in the West Bank, however only 32% believes Israel will move forward with this in the coming year.
- 1Findings of the National Security Survey: June 2026↗
-
Claim 64
“the Palestinians certainly behaved in a psychotic way during the second inif when they exploded buses, bombs in buses”
Palestinian militant groups carried out bombings on buses during the Second Intifada.
Palestinian militant groups carried out multiple suicide bombings on buses and at bus stops during the Second Intifada, including attacks in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and elsewhere in Israel.
Sources
- 1Second Intifada↗
Supports
A prominent feature of the Second Intifada was a series of suicide bombings carried out by Palestinian militant groups.
- 2Beersheba bus bombings↗
Supports
The Beersheba bus bombings were two Palestinian suicide attacks carried out nearly simultaneously aboard commuter buses in Beersheba, Israel, on August 31, 2004.
- 1Second Intifada↗
-
Claim 65
“and um in in streets and killed over a thousand Israelis during that second inif that rebellion in 2001, 2002 2003.”
More than 1,000 Israelis were killed during the Second Intifada in 2001, 2002, and 2003.
The Second Intifada continued after 2003, and the Israeli Defense Ministry records 900 Israeli deaths by the end of 2003. Thus, the claim is false as framed around 2001–2003, even though the broader 2000–2005 conflict caused more than 1,000 Israeli deaths.
The dates '2001, 2002 2003' are treated as limiting the claim's timeframe. The Second Intifada as a whole lasted beyond 2003 and did result in more than 1,000 Israeli deaths, but the cited official tally was 900 by the end of 2003.
Sources
- 12000-2005↗
Refutes
By the end of 2003, 900 Israelis were killed, and over 7,000 were injured.
- 12000-2005↗
-
Claim 66
“They're anti-semitic and they”
Hamas is antisemitic.
The Congressional Research Service describes Hamas's 1988 charter as containing antisemitic rhetoric. The statement is supported when referring to Hamas's ideology and founding charter, although Hamas later issued a political document that attempted to distinguish its conflict from Judaism generally.
Sources
- 1Hamas: Background, Current Status, and U.S. Policy↗
Supports
Hamas’s 1988 charter committed the group to the destruction of Israel and the establishment of an Islamic state in all of historic Palestine (comprising present-day Israel, the West Bank and Gaza), and included anti-Semitic rhetoric.
- 1Hamas: Background, Current Status, and U.S. Policy↗
-
Claim 67
“The kamas began on the October 7th. The kizbala of Lebanon began the next day from Lebanon”
Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, and Hezbollah began attacks from Lebanon the next day.
The dates and sequence are supported by congressional and UN sources: Hamas-led attacks began on October 7, 2023, and rockets were fired from Lebanon toward Israel on October 8.
Sources
- 1Israel and Hamas October 2023 Conflict: Frequently Asked Questions↗
Supports
On October 7, 2023, the Palestinian Sunni Islamist group Hamas (a U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organization, or FTO) led surprise attacks against Israel from the Gaza Strip by land, sea, and air.
- 2UNIFIL statement on rocket and return fire on 08 October 2023↗
Supports
Early this morning, UNIFIL peacekeepers detected several rockets fired from southeast Lebanon toward Israeli-occupied territory in the general area of Kafr Chouba, and artillery fire from Israel to Lebanon in response.
- 1Israel and Hamas October 2023 Conflict: Frequently Asked Questions↗
-
Claim 68
“eventually the Houthis in s in in Yemen and the Iranians from Iran itself all attacked in in successively the the Jewish state”
The Houthis and Iran later attacked Israel in sequence after the October 7 attack.
The Houthis carried out attacks connected to the conflict beginning in late 2023, while Iran directly attacked Israel from Iranian territory in April and October 2024. Those events occurred successively, though they were not all part of one single coordinated attack.
Sources
- 1Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea: Issues for Congress↗
Supports
In October 2023, the Houthis threatened to intervene on behalf of the Palestinians against Israel, and in November the Houthis announced that they would attack Israeli ships in the Red Sea and downed a U.S. drone.
- 2U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel: Overview and Developments since October 7, 2023↗
Supports
On April 13, 2024 Iran initiated the first-ever direct military action against Israel from Iranian territory in the form of aerial attacks (drones and ballistic and cruise missiles).
- 1Houthi Attacks in the Red Sea: Issues for Congress↗
-
Claim 69
“The Palestinians have always rejected it.”
Palestinians have always rejected a two-state partition of the land.
The claim is contradicted by the PLO's 1993 recognition of Israel and participation in the Oslo process, as well as its later formal endorsement of a two-state solution. Palestinian factions and leaders have repeatedly disagreed over or rejected particular proposals, but 'always' is inaccurate.
The word 'always' is judged literally: one documented Palestinian acceptance or participation in a two-state process is sufficient to refute it.
Sources
- 1Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations: Oslo Accords↗
Refutes
Israel accepted the PLO as the representative of the Palestinians, and the PLO renounced terrorism and recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace.
- 2Ending the occupation, establishing the State - PA programme↗
Refutes
The PLO, the founder and nurturer of the Palestinian national struggle and the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, also offered in 1988 the Palestinian Peace Initiative, in which it officially endorsed the two-state solution in line with relevant international resolutions.
- 1Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations: Oslo Accords↗
-
Claim 70
“many Israeli governments and many Israeli governments and the Zionist movements since 1937 has always agreed to partition and to two states between the river and the sea.”
Israeli governments and Zionist movements have consistently supported partition and two states since 1937.
Some mainstream Zionist leaders accepted the principle of partition in 1937, and some Israeli governments later supported negotiations based on two states. However, the Zionist movement was divided over partition, and later Israeli governments—including the government represented in a 2024 Knesset statement—rejected establishing a Palestinian state, so the claim overstates historical continuity.
Omits: The Zionist movement was divided over partition in 1937, and Israel's government unanimously opposed the establishment of a Palestinian state in a 2024 Knesset statement.
The intensifier 'always' is judged as asserting a continuous consensus across the relevant Zionist movements and governments; that reading is misleading because the historical record includes significant opposition and later governmental rejection.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1Opposing Partition: the Zionist Predicaments after the Shoah↗
Refutes
In 1937, the Zionist movement was equally divided over the British proposal to partition Mandatory Palestine as enunciated in the Peel Commission report.
- 2Prime Minister MK Netanyahu to Knesset Plenum↗
Background
For the past five months we have been conducting an unprecedented diplomatic campaign that has enabled the IDF soldiers and the state to wage the war without disruption and without interruption.
- 3Knesset Plenum votes in favor of declaration stating that parliament opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state↗
Supports
Promoting the idea of a Palestinian state at this time would be a reward for terrorism and would only encourage Hamas and its supporters, who will view this as a victory thanks to the massacre of October 7, 2023, and a prelude to the takeover of jihadist Islam in the Middle East.
- 1Opposing Partition: the Zionist Predicaments after the Shoah↗
-
Claim 71
“we never commit crimes. We never kill civilians.”
Hamas never commits crimes and never kills civilians.
The UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Hamas members and other armed groups deliberately killed civilians, injured and mistreated people, and took hostages. It expressly characterized those actions as war crimes, directly contradicting the statement.
Sources
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Refutes
In relation to the attack of 7 October in Israel, the Commission concludes on reasonable grounds that members of the military wings of Hamas and of other Palestinian armed groups, as well as Palestinian civilians who were directly participating in the hostilities, deliberately killed, injured, mistreated, took hostages and committed SGBV against: civilians, including Israeli citizens and foreign nationals; and members of the ISF, including soldiers considered hors de combat.
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
-
Claim 72
“organization Hamas pour over the Israeli border and commit a series of despicable crimes in which you massacred innocent civilians uh all over uh Israel.”
Hamas crossed the Israeli border and massacred innocent civilians across Israel during the October 7 attack.
UN investigators describe the October 7 ground assault as targeting civilian communities and military bases in southern Israel. The claim is therefore misleading because 'all over Israel' suggests a nationwide spread of the massacres rather than the concentrated attacks in southern Israel.
Omits: The attacks were concentrated primarily in southern Israel near the Gaza border, although rockets were also fired toward other areas; saying civilians were massacred 'all over Israel' creates a broader geographic impression than the evidence supports.
The intensifier 'all over Israel' was judged. The underlying claim that Hamas-led attackers killed innocent civilians is supported, but the geographic qualifier overstates the distribution of the ground attacks.
Sources
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Background
On 7 October, a coordinated attack by more than 1,000 members of Hamas military wing and other Palestinian armed groups, accompanied by Palestinian civilians, was launched against Israeli civilian targets and military bases in southern Israel, near the border with Gaza.
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
-
Claim 73
“You then captured over 250 of them, including Holocaust survivors and a baby.”
More than 250 people were captured and taken to Gaza, including Holocaust survivors and at least one baby.
UN investigators recorded 251 people abducted and taken to Gaza, including 36 children and older persons. Israeli government documentation identifies the abductees as including infants and elderly people, including Holocaust survivors; the UN investigation also documented the abduction of a nine-month-old baby.
Sources
- 1Treatment of detainees and hostages and attacks on medical facilities and personnel↗
Supports
On 7 October 2023, a total of 251 people (226 civilians and 25 members of the Israeli security forces) were abducted in Israel and taken to Gaza as hostages.
- 2Hamas-Israel Conflict 2023: Key Legal Aspects↗
Supports
At least 247 Israelis and foreign nationals were abducted by Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other groups and taken hostage in Gaza, the majority of them being civilians, including women, children, infants, the elderly (including Holocaust survivors), and persons with disabilities.
- 3Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Supports
In another case from Nir Oz, an entire family was abducted to Gaza, including both parents, a four-year-old boy and a 9-month-old baby.
- 1Treatment of detainees and hostages and attacks on medical facilities and personnel↗
-
Claim 74
“We never commit crimes against maybe some mistake happened, but it is not the policy of Hamas. It is not committed.”
The assertion that Hamas never committed crimes, with any mistakes not being official policy, is false.
The UN Commission of Inquiry found that Hamas military-wing members and other Palestinian armed groups committed war crimes during the October 7 attack, including murder, intentionally directing attacks against civilians, and taking hostages. That directly refutes the categorical claim that Hamas never committed crimes.
Sources
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Refutes
In relation to the Commission’s investigation into the attack of 7 October in Israel, the Commission found that members of Hamas military wing, members of the military wings of other Palestinian armed groups and Palestinian civilians committed war crimes, as well as violations and abuses of IHL and IHRL.
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
-
Claim 75
“once it was clear the magnitude of what happened. It was clear that crimes of a significant magnitude, war crimes, I know some human rights organizations will also say crimes against humanity of so crimes of a significant magnitude occurred on October 7th.”
Crimes of significant magnitude, including war crimes and crimes against humanity, occurred during the October 7 attack.
The UN Commission of Inquiry concluded that Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups committed war crimes during the October 7 attack, and separately found that crimes against humanity including murder, extermination, torture, and inhuman treatment were committed in connection with the attacks and hostage-taking.
Sources
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Supports
In relation to the Commission’s investigation into the attack of 7 October in Israel, the Commission found that members of Hamas military wing, members of the military wings of other Palestinian armed groups and Palestinian civilians committed war crimes, as well as violations and abuses of IHL and IHRL.
- 2Treatment of detainees and hostages and attacks on medical facilities and personnel↗
Supports
Crimes against humanity, including torture, enforced disappearance and other inhumane acts, were committed against hostages by Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups.
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
-
Claim 76
“that Hamas had weaponized rape and sexual violence, I don't believe those claims have been borne out by the available the available evidence.”
The available evidence has not established that Hamas weaponized rape or sexual violence.
The phrase 'weaponized rape' has no single agreed operational definition: it could mean that sexual violence occurred, that it was used intentionally as a tactic, or that it was part of an organized policy. UN investigators found reasonable grounds to believe rape and gang-rape occurred during the attacks, but said the overall magnitude, scope, and specific attribution required further investigation; those findings do not by themselves resolve the broader 'weaponized' characterization.
Sources
- 1Following visit to Israel and the occupied West Bank, UN Special Representative finds sexual violence occurred on 7 October↗
Background
The mission team found that there are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence occurred in multiple locations during the 7 October attacks, including rape and gang-rape in at least three locations.
- 2Official visit of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on Sexual Violence in Conflict to Israel and the occupied West Bank↗
Background
The mission team was unable to establish the prevalence of sexual violence and concludes that the overall magnitude, scope, and specific attribution of these violations would require a fully-fledged investigation.
- 1Following visit to Israel and the occupied West Bank, UN Special Representative finds sexual violence occurred on 7 October↗
-
Claim 77
“I have written more than 50 pages because I've read everything you've ever written multiple times.”
Finkelstein says he wrote more than 50 pages criticizing Benny Morris.
This is a personal claim about the amount of writing and reading the speaker conducted. No reliable public source establishes whether he wrote more than 50 pages or read all of Morris's work multiple times.
No supporting links were returned for this claim.
-
Claim 78
“Earlier this year, an independent Israeli investigation published details of systematic widespread sexual violence by Hamas on October the 7th.”
An independent Israeli investigation reported systematic and widespread sexual violence by Hamas on October 7.
The Civil Commission's report describes itself as an independent investigation and states that Hamas and collaborators used sexual violence as a widespread and systematic tactic during the October 7 attack. The UN independently found reasonable grounds to believe rape and other sexual violence occurred, although it did not determine that the violence was systematic or a tactic of war.
Sources
- 1The Civil Commission’s Report on Oct 7th Sexual Violence - Silenced NO More↗
Supports
Across homes, roads, shelters, the Nova music festival, military bases, and during captivity in Gaza, Hamas and its collaborators used sexual violence as a widespread and systematic tactic.
- 2Briefing by SRSG-SVC, Ms. Pramila Patten to the Security Council↗
Background
Neither could I determine whether sexual violence was used as a tactic of war, or in a widespread and/or systematic manner.
- 1The Civil Commission’s Report on Oct 7th Sexual Violence - Silenced NO More↗
-
Claim 79
“The Civil Commission Silence No More report says in addition to interviews with survivors, it has more than 10,000 photographs and videos filmed by attackers.”
The Civil Commission report contained more than 10,000 photographs and videos filmed by attackers.
The report does cite over 10,000 photographs and video segments, and it says perpetrators filmed themselves and circulated images. However, the transcript presents the entire 10,000-item figure as footage filmed by attackers, which the report's evidence summary does not establish.
Omits: The report's published evidence summary describes more than 10,000 photographs and video segments as reviewed documentation, but does not say that all of those materials were filmed by attackers; it separately says perpetrators filmed and circulated some material.
Sources
- 1The Civil Commission’s Report on Oct 7th Sexual Violence - Silenced NO More↗
Supports
Over 10,000 photographs and video segments
- 2The Civil Commission’s Report on Oct 7th Sexual Violence - Silenced NO More Executive Summary↗
Background
Perpetrators filmed themselves and circulated images and videos during the attacks, including assaulting, humiliating, abducting, killing women, children, and entire families, and desecrating bodies.
- 1The Civil Commission’s Report on Oct 7th Sexual Violence - Silenced NO More↗
-
Claim 80
“by people like Christina Lamb at the Sunday Times in the UK who is one of the best journalists I would argue in the world and certainly not uh partisan in any sense uh reporting extensively on the weaponization of rape and sexual assault by Hamas”
Christina Lamb reported extensively on allegations that Hamas weaponized rape and sexual assault.
Christina Lamb reported on testimonies and allegations of sexual violence during the October 7 attacks, and independent descriptions of her work characterize it as highlighting rape as a weapon of war. The transcript's praise of her quality and impartiality is opinion, not assessed here.
Sources
- 1Rape is ‘the most neglected war crime,’ sexual violence expert says↗
Supports
Christina Lamb, the chief foreign correspondent for The Sunday Times in the United Kingdom, recently returned from a reporting trip to Israel.
- 2Christina Lamb | The Orwell Foundation↗
Supports
No journalist has done more to highlight the use of rape as a weapon of war nor the lack of accountability.
- 1Rape is ‘the most neglected war crime,’ sexual violence expert says↗
-
Claim 81
“yet there are people like Norman Finglestein who are adamant it never happened.”
Norman Finkelstein is adamant that sexual violence on October 7 never happened.
Finkelstein rejects the claim of systematic, weaponized rape, but he does not maintain that sexual violence categorically never occurred. He wrote that rapes most likely did occur, though he characterized them as potentially isolated incidents.
Sources
- 1Pramila Patten’s Rape Fantasies: A Critical Analysis of the UN Report on Sexual Violence during the 7 October Attack↗
Refutes
if rapes did occur on 7 October—and most likely they did—these were isolated incidents perpetrated in the main by Gaza riff-raff and hooligans
- 2“I Want No States”: Norman Finkelstein on the Future of Gaza↗
Refutes
the weaponizing of rape didn't happen, but terrible things happened.
- 1Pramila Patten’s Rape Fantasies: A Critical Analysis of the UN Report on Sexual Violence during the 7 October Attack↗
-
Claim 82
“there were witnesses who ended up alive and saw um rapes.”
Eyewitnesses who survived the October 7 attack reported seeing rapes.
The UN Special Representative reported reasonable grounds to believe rape and gang rape occurred, based in part on credible eyewitness statements and corroborating witness accounts. This supports the narrower claim that surviving witnesses reported seeing such acts, without establishing every allegation as proven beyond doubt.
Sources
- 1Briefing by SRSG-SVC, Ms. Pramila Patten to the Security Council↗
Supports
There are reasonable grounds to believe that conflict-related sexual violence, including rape and gang-rape occurred in at least three locations
- 2Pramila Patten’s Rape Fantasies: A Critical Analysis of the UN Report on Sexual Violence during the 7 October Attack↗
Supports
Based on the examination of available information, including credible statements by eyewitnesses, there are reasonable grounds to believe that multiple incidents of rape, including gang rape, occurred
- 1Briefing by SRSG-SVC, Ms. Pramila Patten to the Security Council↗
-
Claim 83
“There there were lots of women who were raped and murdered and looked like they'd been raped and murdered.”
Many women were raped and murdered, with some bodies appearing to show rape and murder.
Reliable investigations support that sexual violence occurred in at least some locations, but this sentence's quantity term "lots" is undefined and its visual inference does not establish how many women were raped. The claim therefore cannot be judged precisely as stated.
The intensifier "lots" is undefined, and "looked like they'd been raped" describes an appearance rather than a defined forensic finding. The claim is judged as stated rather than as the narrower claim that some sexual violence occurred.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Briefing by SRSG-SVC, Ms. Pramila Patten to the Security Council↗
Background
Neither could I determine the prevalence of sexual violence during and after the 7 October attacks.
- 1Briefing by SRSG-SVC, Ms. Pramila Patten to the Security Council↗
-
Claim 84
“there were also rapes incidentally of Israeli hostages, women hostages”
Israeli women held hostage in Gaza were raped by their captors.
The UN reported clear and convincing information that some hostages held in Gaza experienced sexual violence, including rape, and released female hostages have made rape and sexual-abuse allegations. The evidence supports the existence of reported rape of female hostages, though not every individual allegation has been independently verified.
Sources
- 1Reasonable Grounds to Believe Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Occurred in Israel During 7 October Attacks↗
Supports
With regard to the hostages taken to Gaza, we found clear and convincing information that sexual violence, including rape, sexualized torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment has been committed against captives.
- 2Treatment of detainees and hostages and attacks on medical facilities and personnel↗
Supports
One released female hostage reported that she had been raped in an apartment.
- 1Reasonable Grounds to Believe Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Occurred in Israel During 7 October Attacks↗
-
Claim 85
“I think at least of one case of a male hostage raped by their c c their kamas capttors while they were um held in Gaza after October 7th.”
At least one male Israeli hostage was raped by Hamas captors in Gaza after October 7.
There are public allegations of sexual abuse or sexual violence against male hostages, but the transcript states a confirmed rape by Hamas captors. Reuters reported the first public male-hostage allegation as sexual violence, attributed the captivity to Islamic Jihad, and said it could not independently confirm the specifics.
Omits: Publicly reported evidence establishes allegations of sexual violence against male hostages, but the cited male-hostage case was attributed in reporting to Palestinian Islamic Jihad rather than Hamas and was not independently confirmed as rape by Reuters; the UN later said it could not verify later male-hostage allegations.
Sources
- 1Freed Israeli hostage says he faced sexual violence in Gaza captivity, TV reports↗
Refutes
Reuters was unable to speak to Braslavski directly and could not independently confirm the specifics of his account.
- 2Freed Israeli hostage says he faced sexual violence in Gaza captivity, TV reports↗
Refutes
Braslavski was held by Islamic Jihad, a Palestinian militant group allied with Hamas which also took hostages in the 2023 attack.
- 3Conflict-related sexual violence - 2026 Report of the Secretary-General↗
Background
The United Nations was not able to verify any of these reports, given the continued denial of access by the Government of Israel to competent United Nations bodies to carry out investigations.
- 1Freed Israeli hostage says he faced sexual violence in Gaza captivity, TV reports↗
-
Claim 86
“the Israeli occupation since 1967 and if you like what happened in 1948 in some way explains how the kamas did what it did on October 7th”
The Israeli occupation since 1967 and events in 1948 in some way explain how Hamas carried out the October 7 attack.
The occupation beginning in 1967 and the mass displacement associated with the 1948 war are documented historical facts, but the phrase “in some way explains” asserts an undefined causal relationship that cannot be objectively tested as stated.
Sources
- 1“Hopeless, Starving, and Besieged”: Israel’s Forced Displacement of Palestinians in Gaza↗
Background
The October 13, 2023 order forms part of what Human Rights Watch has termed an “evacuation system” that combines evacuation orders and directives to Palestinians in Gaza to move from their homes and other places of refuge to evacuation areas and warnings that specific areas or buildings would be under attack.
- 2Nowhere to Go in Gaza↗
Background
The Gaza Strip is hemmed in on three sides by fences and walls, and the Israeli navy patrols its coast.
- 1“Hopeless, Starving, and Besieged”: Israel’s Forced Displacement of Palestinians in Gaza↗
-
Claim 87
“the Israeli counter offensive wasn't against the population of Gaza it was against the kamas”
Israel’s counteroffensive was directed against Hamas rather than Gaza’s population.
Israel stated that its military objective was to defeat Hamas, but the categorical claim that the operation was not against Gaza's population creates a false impression by omitting the extensive documented impact on civilians and civilian objects.
Omits: The statement omits documented Israeli attacks affecting civilians and civilian infrastructure, including residential areas, hospitals and shelters, as well as repeated mass displacement caused by Israeli evacuation orders.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned False and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1OHCHR: Pattern of Israeli attacks on Gaza hospitals raises grave concerns↗
Refutes
During the period covered by the report, there were at least 136 strikes on at least 27 hospitals and 12 other medical facilities, claiming significant casualties among doctors, nurses, medics and other civilians and causing significant damage, if not complete destruction of civilian infrastructure.
- 2Mass evacuations in Gaza choke survival and severely constrain aid operations↗
Refutes
Successive mass evacuation orders issued by Israeli forces amid hostilities have displaced 90 per cent of Gaza’s residents since October 2023, often multiple times, exposing them to harm and depriving them of the essentials to survive.
- 1OHCHR: Pattern of Israeli attacks on Gaza hospitals raises grave concerns↗
-
Claim 88
“the kamas was embedded among the people there in the houses in the residential buildings in underground tunnels under hospitals under mosques, inside mosques, etc.”
Hamas was embedded among civilians in residential buildings and operated tunnels beneath hospitals and mosques.
There is evidence of Hamas or other Palestinian armed-group infrastructure in or near some civilian areas, including tunnel infrastructure near hospitals. However, the wording presents the full range of allegations as established across the listed locations, while independent investigations found significant evidentiary disputes and denials.
Omits: The claim omits that major parts of Israel’s allegations about Hamas’s use of hospitals and civilian facilities were disputed and, according to the UN Commission of Inquiry, Israel did not substantiate its claim that more than 85 percent of major medical facilities were used for Hamas operations.
Sources
- 1Treatment of detainees and hostages and attacks on medical facilities and personnel↗
Refutes
Israeli security forces asserted that over 85 per cent of major medical facilities in Gaza were used by Hamas for terror operations, but did not provide evidence to substantiate that claim.
- 2Detailed findings on the military operations and attacks carried out in the Occupied Palestinian Territory from 7 October to 31 December 2023↗
Supports
According to ISF, these groups operate from densely populated areas, utilizing civilian infrastructure such as residential buildings, hospitals, mosques and schools, and even storing weapons in children’s rooms.
- 3Exploitation of civilian infrastructure: Hamas' Operations in Hospitals↗
Supports
For years, the Hamas terrorist organization has systematically placed terror infrastructure in sensitive civilian areas such as schools, kindergartens, and mosques.
- 1Treatment of detainees and hostages and attacks on medical facilities and personnel↗
-
Claim 89
“for the Israeli troops and air force to get at the kamas fighters, they ended up collaterally killing the people among whom they were embedded”
Civilian deaths caused by Israeli attacks were collateral deaths resulting from Hamas’s embedding among the population.
Civilian deaths did occur in densely populated areas where Palestinian armed groups operated, but describing them categorically as collateral killings caused by Hamas’s embedding leaves out independent findings that some Israeli attacks directly targeted civilians or were conducted with disregard for distinction and proportionality.
Omits: The claim omits findings by the UN Commission of Inquiry that Israeli forces used methods and strategies producing direct and intentional attacks on civilians, rather than all civilian deaths being merely collateral consequences of Hamas’s presence.
Sources
- 1Israeli authorities, Palestinian armed groups are responsible for war crimes, other grave violations of international law, UN Inquiry finds↗
Refutes
The immense numbers of civilian casualties in Gaza and widespread destruction of civilian objects and infrastructure were the inevitable result of a strategy undertaken with intent to cause maximum damage, disregarding the principles of distinction, proportionality and adequate precautions.
- 2OHCHR: Pattern of Israeli attacks on Gaza hospitals raises grave concerns - report↗
Refutes
Intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such, or against individual civilians not taking direct part in hostilities, including the launching of an indiscriminate attack resulting in death or injury to civilians; and intentionally launching disproportionate attacks, are also war crimes, the report adds.
- 1Israeli authorities, Palestinian armed groups are responsible for war crimes, other grave violations of international law, UN Inquiry finds↗
-
Claim 90
“There was a war there. kamas took the first stage started the war launched the war and Israel struck back”
The October 7 Hamas-led attack initiated the current Gaza war, after which Israel launched military operations.
The UN Commission of Inquiry describes the October 7 attack as an attack launched against Israeli civilian targets and military bases, followed by Israel’s military operations in Gaza. This does not mean Hamas initiated the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
The phrase “started the war” is judged as referring to the current Israel-Hamas war that began on October 7, 2023, not the entire decades-long Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Sources
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Supports
On 7 October, a coordinated attack by more than 1,000 members of Hamas military wing and other Palestinian armed groups, accompanied by Palestinian civilians, was launched against Israeli civilian targets and military bases in southern Israel, near the border with Gaza.
- 2Israeli authorities, Palestinian armed groups are responsible for war crimes, other grave violations of international law, UN Inquiry finds↗
Supports
Israeli authorities are responsible for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during the military operations and attacks in Gaza since 7 October 2023, the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel, said in a new report today.
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
-
Claim 91
“Israel killed tens of thousands of people in its counter offensive, but told most of the civilians in most places, get out of this district, that district, the next district”
Israel killed tens of thousands of people in Gaza and issued evacuation warnings or orders to civilians in many areas.
By February 6, 2024, UN reporting recorded more than 27,000 Palestinian fatalities, supporting “tens of thousands,” and the UN documented more than 80 evacuation orders. But the claim creates the impression of comprehensive civilian protection, whereas the UN found many orders unclear, confusing, or insufficiently timed.
Omits: The claim omits that evacuation orders were often unclear or confusing, sometimes gave insufficient time, and did not reliably provide safe routes or safe destinations.
The phrase “most of the civilians in most places” is judged as a claim of broad and generally effective coverage, not merely as an assertion that Israel issued some evacuation orders.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second Accurate. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1Hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel - reported impact | Day 122↗
Supports
27, 708+ Reported fatalities
- 2Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Supports
The Commission documented and analysed more than 80 evacuation orders issued by the ISF between 7 October and 30 December 2023.
- 3Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Refutes
The Commission finds that evacuation orders were at times unclear and confusing, and the timeframe provided for the civilian population to evacuate safely was unstated or insufficient, particularly in relation to large-scale evacuations.
- 1Hostilities in the Gaza Strip and Israel - reported impact | Day 122↗
-
Claim 92
“This isn't what people do in a genocide. Jenna, what they do is they actually round up people and massacre them. Israelis didn't”
Genocide consists of rounding people up and massacring them, and the absence of that pattern means Israel’s conduct was not genocide.
International law defines genocide through specified acts committed with the intent to destroy a protected group, not through a requirement that victims first be rounded up and massacred. The UN’s definition includes several other underlying acts, so the speaker’s description is materially incomplete and cannot by itself rule out genocide.
Omits: The claim omits that the Genocide Convention also covers causing serious bodily or mental harm, deliberately inflicting destructive living conditions, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children; it does not require a roundup-and-massacre pattern.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Misleading and the second False. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1Definitions of Genocide and Related Crimes↗
Refutes
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
- 2Definitions of Genocide and Related Crimes↗
Refutes
The physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively: Killing members of the group; Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
- 3Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry examining land and housing in the Occupied Palestinian Territory and in Israel and presents a summary of the Commission's findings on the crime of genocide↗
Background
The Commission thus concluded that the State of Israel is responsible for the commission of genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza.
- 1Definitions of Genocide and Related Crimes↗
-
Claim 93
“They told the civilians, "Move aside. We want to get to the kamas." And a lot of people were killed in this process because the kamas, as they said, hid among them.”
Israeli or other forces told civilians to move aside to reach Hamas, and many civilians were killed because Hamas was hiding among them.
The transcript does not identify the incident, date, location, or the actors involved. Without that information, the alleged instruction and causal explanation cannot be reliably confirmed or refuted from available sources.
No supporting links were returned for this claim.
-
Claim 94
“the killing by Turks, um the Turkish Muslims of the Christians in Turkey over the years 1894, 1924.”
Turkish Muslims killed Christians in Turkey during the period from 1894 to 1924.
The historical atrocities against Ottoman Christian populations are well documented, but the 1894–1924 range and the description as a single killing campaign in “Turkey” are materially imprecise. The Ottoman Empire, rather than the modern Republic of Turkey, conducted the principal campaigns cited by historians.
Omits: The statement conflates distinct episodes and uses an imprecise date range: the Armenian massacres occurred in 1894–1896, the Armenian genocide primarily in 1915–1916, and the broader Ottoman campaigns against Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks are generally dated 1914–1923.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1The Armenian Genocide (1915-16): In Depth↗
Background
In all, at least 80,000 Armenians were killed between 1894 and 1896.
- 2Armenia - United States Holocaust Memorial Museum↗
Background
Between spring 1915 and autumn 1916, the Ottoman Empire arrested, deported, conducted mass killings, and created conditions intended to cause widespread death among the country’s Armenian Christian citizens, most of whom were living in the territory of modern-day Turkey.
- 3IAGS Resolution on Assyrian and Greek Genocide↗
Background
the Ottoman campaign against Christian minorities of the Empire between 1914 and 1923 constituted a genocide against Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontian and Anatolian Greeks.
- 1The Armenian Genocide (1915-16): In Depth↗
-
Claim 95
“This isn't what happened in the Gaza Strip.”
Genocide did not occur in the Gaza Strip.
The claim is a categorical legal characterization, and credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions. The UN Commission of Inquiry and Amnesty International have classified Israel’s conduct in Gaza as genocide, while Israel has formally rejected that conclusion; the ICJ genocide case had not yet produced a final merits judgment in the cited materials.
The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.
Sources
- 1Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territory: UN report concluding Israel is committing genocide in Gaza must spur international action↗
Supports
the UN Commission of Inquiry’s damning report provides further confirmation of what Amnesty International and others have been concluding for months: that the Israeli authorities and Israeli forces have committed and are continuing to commit genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
- 2Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry↗
Refutes
Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry, spreading the malicious “genocide” narrative
- 3Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territory: ‘You Feel Like You Are Subhuman’: Israel’s Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza↗
Supports
It concludes that Israel has committed genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
- 1Israel/Occupied Palestinian Territory: UN report concluding Israel is committing genocide in Gaza must spur international action↗
-
Claim 96
“In July 2025, the International Court of Justice, the supreme legal body in the world, ruled that Israel's occupation of Gaza, Israel's occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem and Gaza, are illegal under international law and Israel has to leave as quickly, as rapidly as possible.”
In July 2025, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel’s occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, was illegal and that Israel had to leave as rapidly as possible.
The relevant ICJ advisory opinion was dated July 19, 2024. It concluded that Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Gaza, was unlawful and that Israel must end that presence as rapidly as possible, but the transcript gives the wrong year and describes the ruling imprecisely as declaring the occupation itself illegal.
Sources
- 1Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
Refutes
19 JULY 2024
- 2Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
Supports
The Court concludes that Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is illegal and that Israel is under an obligation to bring to an end its presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory as rapidly as possible.
- 1Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
-
Claim 97
“the supreme legal body in the world”
The International Court of Justice is the supreme legal body in the world.
“Supreme legal body in the world” has no agreed operational definition. The ICJ is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, but there is no universally recognized global ranking that makes it categorically supreme over all courts or legal institutions.
Sources
- 1Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
Background
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE
- 1Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
-
Claim 98
“Israel has no title to any of Gaza.”
Israel has no sovereign title to any part of Gaza.
Under the law of occupation, an occupying power does not acquire sovereignty over occupied territory. The ICJ also stated that Israel is not entitled to sovereignty over any part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory, which includes Gaza.
Sources
- 1Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
Supports
Israel is not entitled to sovereignty over or to exercise sovereign powers in any part of the Occupied Palestinian Territory
- 2Occupation and international humanitarian law↗
Supports
The occupant does not acquire sovereignty over the territory.
- 1Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024↗
-
Claim 99
“under international law, there is no prohibition on a people using armed force to expel an occupying power.”
International law does not prohibit a people from using armed force to expel an occupying power.
International humanitarian law recognizes wars of national liberation as international armed conflicts, but that classification does not mean every armed action by a people is lawful or unrestricted. The categorical statement that there is “no prohibition” is therefore too broad and creates a misleading impression.
Omits: The statement omits that recognition of national-liberation conflicts concerns the application of international humanitarian law and does not create a blanket authorization to use force; participants remain bound by the laws of war, and the legality of force under the UN Charter depends on the actor and circumstances.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Accurate and the second Misleading. Recorded as Misleading.
Sources
- 1National liberation wars↗
Background
They are armed conflicts in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination and alien occupation and against racist regimes in the exercise of their right to self-determination.
- 2IHL and the protection of war victims↗
Background
A war of national liberation is a conflict in which a people is fighting against a colonial power, in the exercise of its right of self- determination.
- 3Rule of Law and Peace and Security↗
Refutes
Of particular importance to peace and security are the principles of territorial integrity, non-use of threat or force in any manner inconsistent with the Charter and the commitment to implementation of international legal obligations.
- 1National liberation wars↗
-
Claim 100
“Hamas committed a crime of significant magnitude on”
Hamas committed a crime of significant magnitude on October 7.
UN investigators found that Hamas-led Palestinian armed groups intentionally targeted civilians, killed more than 1,200 people and took hostages on October 7, 2023, with acts amounting to war crimes. The phrase “crime of significant magnitude” is broad, but the underlying assertion is well supported.
Sources
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
Supports
These actions constitute war crimes and violations and abuses of IHL and IHRL.
- 1Report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel↗
-
Claim 101
“Israel executed a genocide in Gaza”
Israel committed genocide in Gaza.
The claim reflects conclusions reached by UN investigative bodies, including the Commission of Inquiry, but Israel rejects those conclusions. The International Court of Justice has issued provisional measures in the genocide case, not a final merits judgment establishing genocide.
The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.
Sources
- 1Commission of Inquiry report: Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces have committed and are continuing to commit genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip↗
Supports
Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces have committed and are continuing to commit genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip.
- 2Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry↗
Refutes
Israel categorically rejects the libelous rant published today by the Commission of Inquiry, spreading the malicious “genocide” narrative, in attempt to delegitimize and demonize the State of Israel.
- 3Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip↗
Background
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v.Israel)
- 1Commission of Inquiry report: Israeli authorities and Israeli security forces have committed and are continuing to commit genocide against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip↗
-
Claim 102
“it continues in its aim of trying to expel the entire population.”
Israel’s ongoing aim is to expel the entire population of Gaza.
UN reporting documents mass displacement, forcible transfer concerns and indications that some displacement may be intended to be permanent, but the claim attributes an ongoing aim to expel the entire population. That specific intent and universal scope cannot be confirmed from the available evidence.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1OHCHR report on practices and policies affecting human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 7 October 2023–31 May 2025↗
Supports
Israeli military and other security forces have forced displacement on a mass scale, in circumstances that violate international humanitarian law and, in many cases, amount to forcible transfer as well other war crimes.
- 2OHCHR report on practices and policies affecting human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 7 October 2023–31 May 2025↗
Background
Strong indications that Israel intends their displacement to be permanent, raising concerns over ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the West Bank.
- 1OHCHR report on practices and policies affecting human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 7 October 2023–31 May 2025↗
-
Claim 103
“the state that has breached the prime uh precept of international law by launching an aggression, a brazen, flagrant aggression, the most brazen, the most flagrant in the modern world against Iran.”
Israel launched an attack against Iran that breached international law.
Israel did launch major military operations against Iran in June 2025, but whether that operation constituted the international-law crime or legal category of “aggression” depends on disputed facts and legal analysis, including questions of self-defense and authorization. The superlative comparison with all modern conflicts is also not operationally defined.
The claim includes the undefined superlatives “the most brazen” and “the most flagrant in the modern world”; the judgment is based on the full claim as stated, not merely on whether Israel launched strikes.
Sources
- 1Israel-Iran Conflict, U.S. Strikes, and Ceasefire↗
Supports
On June 13, 2025, Israel began a major military operation against Iran, including air strikes and reported covert action.
- 2Statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio↗
Background
Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran.
- 1Israel-Iran Conflict, U.S. Strikes, and Ceasefire↗
-
Claim 104
There was no war in Gaza.
The International Committee of the Red Cross describes continuing hostilities and an armed conflict between Israel and Hamas, while international bodies have documented military operations and war crimes by the parties. The statement that there was no war is therefore contradicted by the established existence of an armed conflict.
Sources
- 1Israel and the Occupied Territories: armed conflict↗
Refutes
There is state of armed conflict between Israel and the Hamas military wing, that can be classified as a non-international armed conflict.
- 2Hamas-Israel conflict: ICRC facts and figures↗
Refutes
Fourteen months since the devastating events on 07 October 2023, hostilities between Israel and Hamas and other armed groups in Gaza persist.
- 1Israel and the Occupied Territories: armed conflict↗
-
Claim 105
Hamas is not armed.
UN reporting identifies Hamas’s military wing as an armed group and records continuing rocket fire and clashes involving Hamas in 2025. The claim is directly contradicted by these documented activities.
Sources
- 1Israel and the occupied territories: Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict↗
Refutes
Hostilities in the Occupied Palestinian Territory—the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip—continued in 2025 and included Israeli military operations, and clashes between Hamas’ Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades and other Palestinian armed groups and Israeli forces.
- 2OHCHR report on practices and policies affecting human rights in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 7 October 2023–31 May 2025↗
Refutes
Palestinian armed groups also continued to fire inherently indiscriminate weapons into Israel, causing harm to civilians and civilian objects.
- 1Israel and the occupied territories: Office of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict↗
-
Claim 106
“Gaza has been hermetically sealed for three years.”
Gaza had been hermetically sealed for three years.
The claim’s absolute wording is contradicted by the documented chronology: the blockade began in 2007, not three years earlier, and “hermetically sealed” inaccurately implies that no crossings, goods or aid entered. Restrictions were severe, but not literally hermetic.
Sources
- 1Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967↗
Refutes
Hamas took over effective power in the Gaza Strip on 15 June 2007.
- 2Israel and the occupied territories: After two months of aid blockage, humanitarian response in Gaza on verge of total collapse↗
Background
The humanitarian response in Gaza is on the verge of total collapse.
- 1Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967↗
-
Claim 107
“Israel wants to kamas disarmed because it doesn't want a repetition of what kamas did on October 7th against it against Israel's civilian population in the south of the country.”
Israel wants Hamas disarmed to prevent another October 7-style attack on Israeli civilians.
Israeli officials have repeatedly stated that disarming or dismantling Hamas is intended to prevent a repeat of the October 7 attack and to remove Gaza’s capacity to serve as a launchpad for attacks. The statement accurately describes Israel’s stated rationale, without establishing whether that rationale is justified.
Sources
- 1Statement by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu↗
Supports
My goal is that the day after we destroy Hamas, any future civil administration in Gaza does not deny the massacre, does not educate its children to become terrorists, does not pay for terrorists and does not tell its children that their ultimate goal in life is to see the destruction and dissolution of the State of Israel.
- 2Opening statement of Israel’s MFA legal adviser at ICJ proceedings↗
Supports
Israel aims to ensure that Gaza can never again be used as a launch pad for terrorism.
- 1Statement by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu↗
-
Claim 108
“the Iranian regime slaughtered 30 to 40,000 of their own people, Muslims, Iranians a few months ago.”
The Iranian regime killed 30,000 to 40,000 of its own people a few months earlier.
The scale of the 2025–26 crackdown is heavily disputed because of information restrictions and a communications blackout. Some reporting has cited estimates above 30,000, but official and government-reported independent estimates are much lower, so the precise 30,000–40,000 claim is unresolved.
The checker found this claim contested — credible institutions have reached opposing conclusions and no ruling has settled it. This site is not yet publishing that verdict, so it is recorded as unverifiable rather than judged either way.
Sources
- 1Many thousands confirmed killed in recent Iran protests↗
Supports
Other estimates have put the number who have died at more than 33,000.
- 2Iran: protests 2026 – UK and international response↗
Refutes
The Norway-based Iran Human Rights organisation says that at least 3,428 protesters were killed since the start of the protests (to 22 January) and that around 40,000 have been arrested (as of 29 January).
- 3Iran: protests 2026 – UK and international response↗
Refutes
The US-based Human Rights Activists News Agency says that 6,800 civilians were killed, with a further 11,744 under investigation and 53,777 people detained (as of 23 February 2026).
- 1Many thousands confirmed killed in recent Iran protests↗
-
Claim 109
“Israel is afraid that the Iranians are making for are trying to get atomic weaponry”
Iran is trying to obtain nuclear weapons.
Iran has accumulated highly enriched uranium and has unresolved safeguards issues, which create a serious proliferation concern. But the claim presents active efforts to obtain a weapon as established fact, whereas the 2025 U.S. intelligence community assessed that Iran was not building one and the IAEA reported no credible indication of an ongoing structured weapons program.
Omits: The statement omits the 2025 U.S. intelligence assessment that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and the IAEA finding that it had no credible indications of an ongoing undeclared structured nuclear-weapons program, while Iran did possess significant enrichment capabilities and unresolved safeguards issues.
Sources
- 1DNI Gabbard Opening Statement for the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment↗
Refutes
The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.
- 2IAEA Board of Governors report, June 2025↗
Refutes
The Agency has no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme.
- 3IAEA Board of Governors report, June 2025↗
Background
The Agency is not able to verify that there has been no diversion of nuclear material required to be safeguarded under the Agreement to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.
- 1DNI Gabbard Opening Statement for the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment↗
-
Claim 110
“they have said they want to destroy Israel and will use that weaponry to destroy Israel”
Iran has said it wants to destroy Israel and would use nuclear weapons to do so.
Iranian state policy and officials have used rhetoric calling for Israel’s destruction, but the transcript adds the much stronger claim that Iran has said it would use nuclear weapons for that purpose. No reliable source establishes that specific commitment, and U.S. intelligence assessed that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon in 2025.
Omits: Iranian officials and institutions have issued anti-Israel statements, but Iran does not possess a confirmed nuclear weapon, and the available evidence does not establish an official Iranian statement committing to use a future nuclear weapon to destroy Israel.
Sources
- 1June 13, 2025 IDF reveals the Iranian plan to destroy Israel↗
Supports
The IDF Intelligence Directorate has collected and analyzed vast quantities of intelligence materials that reveal the regime has a concrete plan to destroy the State of Israel.
- 2DNI Gabbard Opening Statement for the 2025 Annual Threat Assessment↗
Refutes
The IC continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamanei has not authorized the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.
- 1June 13, 2025 IDF reveals the Iranian plan to destroy Israel↗
-
Claim 111
“that's why Israel has launched its attacks against Iran last year and this year and that's why America joined them”
Israel attacked Iran in the previous year and the current year, and the United States joined the attacks.
Israel conducted a major military operation against Iran in June 2025, and reporting describes a larger joint U.S.-Israeli attack in February 2026. Thus, the chronological assertion is supported, although the transcript’s surrounding claims about the justification for those attacks are separate matters.
“Last year” is interpreted as 2025 and “this year” as 2026, consistent with the transcript being assessed on August 7, 2026.
Sources
- 1Israel-Iran Conflict, U.S. Strikes, and Ceasefire↗
Supports
On June 13, 2025, Israel began a major military operation against Iran, including air strikes and reported covert action.
- 2What Are Iran’s Nuclear and Missile Capabilities?↗
Supports
Israel to launch a full-scale attack on Iran’s nuclear and military facilities in June 2025 and another larger, joint attack with the United States in February 2026.
- 1Israel-Iran Conflict, U.S. Strikes, and Ceasefire↗
-
Claim 112
“Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent.”
Piers Morgan Uncensored describes itself as independent.
The show’s own podcast listings use the phrase “proudly independent,” but “independent” has no clearly specified operational meaning here, and the available source is promotional rather than an independent assessment of ownership or editorial control.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Piers Morgan Uncensored - Podcast - Apple Podcasts↗
Background
Piers Morgan Uncensored is the global arena for fearless debate, bold opinions and major interviews. Follow the podcast for all-new and exclusive daily content.
- 2'I'm Gonna Say It!' N-Word Censorship Debate With Steven Crowder & Marc Lamont Hill - Apple Podcasts↗
Supports
Piers Morgan Uncensored is proudly independent and supported by:
- 1Piers Morgan Uncensored - Podcast - Apple Podcasts↗
-
Claim 113
“The only boss around here is me.”
Piers Morgan is the only boss of Piers Morgan Uncensored.
This asserts a specific fact about the show’s management or ownership, but no reliable source establishes that Piers Morgan is its sole boss or decision-maker.
No supporting links were returned for this claim.
-
Claim 114
“Hit subscribe on YouTube and follow Piers Morgan Uncensored on Spotify and Apple Podcast.”
Piers Morgan Uncensored is available through YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts.
The show has an official YouTube channel and listings on both Spotify and Apple Podcasts, matching the platforms named in the transcript.
Sources
- 1Piers Morgan Uncensored - YouTube↗
Supports
Piers Morgan Uncensored is the global arena for fearless debate, bold opinions and major interviews 📢
- 2Piers Morgan Uncensored | Podcast on Spotify↗
Supports
Piers Morgan Uncensored is the global arena for fearless debate, bold opinions and major interviews. Follow the podcast for all-new and exclusive daily content.
- 3Piers Morgan Uncensored - Podcast - Apple Podcasts↗
Supports
Piers Morgan Uncensored is the global arena for fearless debate, bold opinions and major interviews. Follow the podcast for all-new and exclusive daily content.
- 1Piers Morgan Uncensored - YouTube↗
-
Claim 115
“And we'll do it all for free.”
The show’s content is provided entirely for free.
The official YouTube and podcast listings show publicly accessible episodes, but the statement that the show does “all” of its work for free is broader than the available evidence and does not define whether it excludes advertising, sponsorships, or other monetization.
The intensifier “all” was judged as stated; the transcript does not specify whether it refers only to ordinary audience access or to every form of the show and its associated content.
Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Accurate. Recorded as Unverifiable.
Sources
- 1Piers Morgan Uncensored - Podcast - Apple Podcasts↗
Background
Follow the podcast for all-new and exclusive daily content.
- 2Piers Morgan Uncensored | Podcast on Spotify↗
Background
Follow the podcast for all-new and exclusive daily content.
- 1Piers Morgan Uncensored - Podcast - Apple Podcasts↗