← All receipts
Fact-Checker/Videos
Video fact-check

'Deep Grief and Rage' - Tatiana Maslany on Israel's Genocide

3 claims checked · Published September 2026 · Checked September 2026

Checked by an AI model against live web sources — how this works · report an error

The map

Who said what, and about what

A bounded sample, most disputed claims first — the full list is belowEvery row is reachable by scrolling its column · search matches claim text, verdicts, people, topics and sources · hover a row to trace its chain, click one to pin its detail

The receipts

Every claim, checked

  1. Claim 1
    Unverifiable93% confidence▶ 0:00
    “It was very rare, even in 2024, especially in 2024, to see celebrities, actors, speaking out publicly on Palestine. Not just speaking out publicly, but getting emotional about Palestinian life. That was very rare.”

    The speaker asserts that it was very rare in 2024 for celebrities, particularly actors, to publicly speak about Palestine and become emotional about Palestinian life.

    The claim uses undefined comparative terms—especially “very rare”—without specifying the population of celebrities, the relevant venues, or a threshold for emotional expression. Contemporary reporting documents numerous celebrities and actors speaking publicly on Palestine in 2024, but it does not establish whether that activity was “very rare” under the speaker’s unspecified standard.

    Sources

  2. Claim 2
    Unverifiable50% confidence▶ 0:40
    “I'm standing in front of Scotiabank, which is a you know, very complicit in the genocide.”

    The speaker asserts that Scotiabank was very complicit in the genocide.

    Scotiabank’s asset-management arm did hold a substantial stake in Israeli defense contractor Elbit Systems, a documented fact that prompted protests. But “very complicit in the genocide” has no specified legal or operational threshold, and the cited reporting does not establish that Scotiabank itself has been adjudicated legally complicit in genocide.

    Checked twice, independently: the first pass returned Unverifiable and the second Misleading. Recorded as Unverifiable.

    Sources

  3. Claim 3
    Unverifiable94% confidence▶ 1:23
    “how do we watch this happening without feeling the deep grief and rage that we are complicit in it, that we are actively creating this mass murder and supporting it ideologically and financially and militarily, like all of it.”

    The speaker asserts that the collective referred to as “we” is complicit in and actively creating mass murder while supporting it ideologically, financially, and militarily.

    The claim does not identify who “we” refers to—Canadians, governments, institutions, individuals, or some broader collective—and “actively creating” and “supporting ideologically” lack operational definitions. Reporting documents particular financial relationships and military support connected to the Gaza war, but cannot verify this broad, unspecified attribution as stated.

    Sources